How to Handle Inconsistent JSON Fields: Strings vs. Arrays?
Handling Inconsistent JSON Fields: A Case of Strings vs. Arrays
When dealing with JSON data that is not entirely consistent, challenges may arise in the unmarshalling process. This can occur when a particular field in the JSON varies in its format, posing difficulties for the unmarshalling process.
The Problem:
Consider the following scenario:
type MyListItem struct { Date string `json:"date"` DisplayName string `json:"display_name"` } type MyListings struct { CLItems []MyListItem `json:"myitems"` }
The JSON data has a field called "display_name," which is expected to be a string. However, in some cases, it can also be an array of strings. This inconsistency complicates the unmarshalling process, leading to errors.
The Solution:
To overcome this challenge, we can leverage two techniques:
- Utilizing json.RawMessage: Capture the problematic field as a json.RawMessage type.
- Employing the JSON "-" Name: Define the "DisplayName" field as "-" in the JSON decoder to exclude it from the unmarshalling process.
Updated Code:
type MyListItem struct { Date string `json:"date"` RawDisplayName json.RawMessage `json:"display_name"` DisplayName []string `json:"-"` }
Unmarshalling the JSON:
Unmarshalling the top-level JSON:
var li MyListItem if err := json.Unmarshal(data, &li); err != nil { // handle error }
Extracting the "DisplayName" field depending on its type:
if len(li.RawDisplayName) > 0 { switch li.RawDisplayName[0] { case '"': if err := json.Unmarshal(li.RawDisplayName, &li.DisplayName); err != nil { // handle error } case '[': var s []string if err := json.Unmarshal(li.RawDisplayName, &s); err != nil { // handle error } li.DisplayName = strings.Join(s, "&&") } }
Example:
var listings MyListings if err := json.Unmarshal([]byte(data), &listings); err != nil { // handle error } for i := range listings.CLItems { li := &listings.CLItems[i] if len(li.RawDisplayName) > 0 { switch li.RawDisplayName[0] { case '"': if err := json.Unmarshal(li.RawDisplayName, &li.DisplayName); err != nil { // handle error } case '[': var s []string if err := json.Unmarshal(li.RawDisplayName, &s); err != nil { // handle error } li.DisplayName = strings.Join(s, "&&") } } }
By adopting these techniques, you can effectively handle inconsistent JSON fields, ensuring proper data extraction and manipulation in your application.
The above is the detailed content of How to Handle Inconsistent JSON Fields: Strings vs. Arrays?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics











Go language performs well in building efficient and scalable systems. Its advantages include: 1. High performance: compiled into machine code, fast running speed; 2. Concurrent programming: simplify multitasking through goroutines and channels; 3. Simplicity: concise syntax, reducing learning and maintenance costs; 4. Cross-platform: supports cross-platform compilation, easy deployment.

Golang is better than C in concurrency, while C is better than Golang in raw speed. 1) Golang achieves efficient concurrency through goroutine and channel, which is suitable for handling a large number of concurrent tasks. 2)C Through compiler optimization and standard library, it provides high performance close to hardware, suitable for applications that require extreme optimization.

Golang and Python each have their own advantages: Golang is suitable for high performance and concurrent programming, while Python is suitable for data science and web development. Golang is known for its concurrency model and efficient performance, while Python is known for its concise syntax and rich library ecosystem.

Golang is better than Python in terms of performance and scalability. 1) Golang's compilation-type characteristics and efficient concurrency model make it perform well in high concurrency scenarios. 2) Python, as an interpreted language, executes slowly, but can optimize performance through tools such as Cython.

Golang and C each have their own advantages in performance competitions: 1) Golang is suitable for high concurrency and rapid development, and 2) C provides higher performance and fine-grained control. The selection should be based on project requirements and team technology stack.

Goimpactsdevelopmentpositivelythroughspeed,efficiency,andsimplicity.1)Speed:Gocompilesquicklyandrunsefficiently,idealforlargeprojects.2)Efficiency:Itscomprehensivestandardlibraryreducesexternaldependencies,enhancingdevelopmentefficiency.3)Simplicity:

C is more suitable for scenarios where direct control of hardware resources and high performance optimization is required, while Golang is more suitable for scenarios where rapid development and high concurrency processing are required. 1.C's advantage lies in its close to hardware characteristics and high optimization capabilities, which are suitable for high-performance needs such as game development. 2.Golang's advantage lies in its concise syntax and natural concurrency support, which is suitable for high concurrency service development.

The performance differences between Golang and C are mainly reflected in memory management, compilation optimization and runtime efficiency. 1) Golang's garbage collection mechanism is convenient but may affect performance, 2) C's manual memory management and compiler optimization are more efficient in recursive computing.
