AJAX Long/Short Polling vs. WebSockets: When Should I Choose Which?
Comparing AJAX Long/Short Polling to HTML5 WebSockets: When to Prefer Each
In building real-time web applications, choosing the appropriate communication method is crucial. AJAX long/short polling and HTML5 WebSockets are two popular options, each with its own strengths and weaknesses. This article aims to clarify the scenarios in which one might be preferred over the other.
HTML5 WebSockets: The Superior Choice
HTML5 WebSockets has emerged as the superior option for real-time communication. Unlike long/short polling, which relies on HTTP requests and constant server polling, WebSockets establish a persistent connection between the client and server, allowing for bidirectional data exchange in real time.
WebSockets offer several advantages:
- Efficiency: Continuous connection eliminates the overhead associated with multiple HTTP requests.
- Lower latency: Data transfer occurs as soon as it's available, reducing response time.
- Bidirectional communication: Both the client and server can send and receive data in real time.
- Secure: WebSockets support HTTPS for secure data transmission.
AJAX Long/Short Polling: An Outdated Approach
AJAX long/short polling is an outdated mechanism for real-time communication. It involves sending multiple AJAX requests in rapid succession, hoping to catch any server updates. This approach is both inefficient and unreliable, leading to excessive server load and potential delays.
Scenarios for Using AJAX Long/Short Polling
Despite its drawbacks, AJAX long/short polling may still be appropriate in specific scenarios:
- Browser compatibility: Some older browsers may not support WebSockets (e.g., IE 10 and below).
- Simple interactions: If the real-time functionality is limited to occasional updates, such as displaying a notification, AJAX may suffice.
- Proxy limitations: In certain network environments, WebSockets may not work properly due to proxy restrictions.
Conclusion
For most real-time communication scenarios, HTML5 WebSockets offer significant advantages over AJAX long/short polling. Its high efficiency, low latency, and bidirectional communication make it the ideal choice for building responsive and engaging web applications. However, in limited situations where browser compatibility, simplicity, or proxy issues arise, AJAX long/short polling may still be a viable option.
The above is the detailed content of AJAX Long/Short Polling vs. WebSockets: When Should I Choose Which?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics











Different JavaScript engines have different effects when parsing and executing JavaScript code, because the implementation principles and optimization strategies of each engine differ. 1. Lexical analysis: convert source code into lexical unit. 2. Grammar analysis: Generate an abstract syntax tree. 3. Optimization and compilation: Generate machine code through the JIT compiler. 4. Execute: Run the machine code. V8 engine optimizes through instant compilation and hidden class, SpiderMonkey uses a type inference system, resulting in different performance performance on the same code.

Python is more suitable for beginners, with a smooth learning curve and concise syntax; JavaScript is suitable for front-end development, with a steep learning curve and flexible syntax. 1. Python syntax is intuitive and suitable for data science and back-end development. 2. JavaScript is flexible and widely used in front-end and server-side programming.

The shift from C/C to JavaScript requires adapting to dynamic typing, garbage collection and asynchronous programming. 1) C/C is a statically typed language that requires manual memory management, while JavaScript is dynamically typed and garbage collection is automatically processed. 2) C/C needs to be compiled into machine code, while JavaScript is an interpreted language. 3) JavaScript introduces concepts such as closures, prototype chains and Promise, which enhances flexibility and asynchronous programming capabilities.

The main uses of JavaScript in web development include client interaction, form verification and asynchronous communication. 1) Dynamic content update and user interaction through DOM operations; 2) Client verification is carried out before the user submits data to improve the user experience; 3) Refreshless communication with the server is achieved through AJAX technology.

JavaScript's application in the real world includes front-end and back-end development. 1) Display front-end applications by building a TODO list application, involving DOM operations and event processing. 2) Build RESTfulAPI through Node.js and Express to demonstrate back-end applications.

Understanding how JavaScript engine works internally is important to developers because it helps write more efficient code and understand performance bottlenecks and optimization strategies. 1) The engine's workflow includes three stages: parsing, compiling and execution; 2) During the execution process, the engine will perform dynamic optimization, such as inline cache and hidden classes; 3) Best practices include avoiding global variables, optimizing loops, using const and lets, and avoiding excessive use of closures.

Python and JavaScript have their own advantages and disadvantages in terms of community, libraries and resources. 1) The Python community is friendly and suitable for beginners, but the front-end development resources are not as rich as JavaScript. 2) Python is powerful in data science and machine learning libraries, while JavaScript is better in front-end development libraries and frameworks. 3) Both have rich learning resources, but Python is suitable for starting with official documents, while JavaScript is better with MDNWebDocs. The choice should be based on project needs and personal interests.

Both Python and JavaScript's choices in development environments are important. 1) Python's development environment includes PyCharm, JupyterNotebook and Anaconda, which are suitable for data science and rapid prototyping. 2) The development environment of JavaScript includes Node.js, VSCode and Webpack, which are suitable for front-end and back-end development. Choosing the right tools according to project needs can improve development efficiency and project success rate.
