Pitfalls of URL and URLSearchParams in JavaScript
It All Started With a Bug
Working with URLs in JavaScript and Node.js should be straightforward, but a recent bug in our project led me down a rabbit hole of subtle quirks in the URL and URLSearchParams APIs. This post will explore these quirks, how they can cause problems in your code, and what you can do to avoid them.
The Problem: URL Handling with Axios
We encountered this issue while generating URLs and adding hash signatures to them. The query parameters weren’t consistently percent-encoded, leading to unexpected behavior and wrong hash signatures.
It became clear that the interaction between URL and URLSearchParams objects required extra care.
Pitfall #1: URL.search vs. URLSearchParams.toString()
The first surprise was the difference between URL.search and URLSearchParams.toString().
Use care when using .searchParams to modify the URL because, per the WHATWG specification, the URLSearchParams object uses different rules to determine which characters to percent-encode. For instance, the URL object will not percent-encode the ASCII tilde (~) character, while URLSearchParams will always encode it.
// Example 1 const url = new URL("https://example.com?param=foo bar"); console.log(url.search); // prints param=foo%20bar console.log(url.searchParams.toString()); // prints ?param=foo+bar // Example 2 const myURL = new URL('https://example.org/abc?foo=~bar'); console.log(myURL.search); // prints ?foo=~bar // Modify the URL via searchParams... myURL.searchParams.sort(); console.log(myURL.search); // prints ?foo=%7Ebar
In our project, we needed to explicitly reassign url.search = url.searchParams.toString() to ensure the query string was encoded consistently.
Pitfall #2: The Plus Sign Dilemma
Another gotcha is how URLSearchParams handles characters. By default, URLSearchParams interprets as a space, which may lead to data corruption when encoding binary data or Base64 strings.
const params = new URLSearchParams("bin=E+AXQB+A"); console.log(params.get("bin")); // "E AXQB A"
One solution is to use encodeURIComponent before appending values to URLSearchParams:
params.append("bin", encodeURIComponent("E+AXQB+A"));
More details are available in the MDN documentation.
Pitfall #3: URLSearchParams.get vs. URLSearchParams.toString()
Another subtlety arises when comparing the outputs of URLSearchParams.get and URLSearchParams.toString. For example:
const params = new URLSearchParams("?key=value&key=other"); console.log(params.get("key")); // "value" (first occurrence) console.log(params.toString()); // "key=value&key=other" (all occurrences serialized)
In multi-valued scenarios, get returns only the first value, while toString serializes all.
The Fix in Our Codebase
In our project, we resolved the issue by explicitly reassigning the search property:
url.search = url.searchParams.toString(); url.searchParams.set( "hash", cryptography.createSha256HmacBase64UrlSafe(url.href, SECRET_KEY ?? "") );
This ensured that all query parameters were properly encoded before adding the hash value.
Node.js querystring module
The WHATWG URLSearchParams interface and the querystring module have a similar purpose, but the purpose of the querystring module is more general, as it allows the customization of delimiter characters (& and =). On the other hand, URLSearchParams API is designed purely for URL query strings.
querystring is more performant than URLSearchParams but is not a standardized API. Use URLSearchParams when performance is not critical or when compatibility with browser code is desirable.
When using URLSearchParams unlike querystring module, duplicate keys in the form of array values are not allowed. Arrays are stringified using array.toString(), which simply joins all array elements with commas.
// Example 1 const url = new URL("https://example.com?param=foo bar"); console.log(url.search); // prints param=foo%20bar console.log(url.searchParams.toString()); // prints ?param=foo+bar // Example 2 const myURL = new URL('https://example.org/abc?foo=~bar'); console.log(myURL.search); // prints ?foo=~bar // Modify the URL via searchParams... myURL.searchParams.sort(); console.log(myURL.search); // prints ?foo=%7Ebar
With querystring module, the query string 'foo=bar&abc=xyz&abc=123' is parsed into:
const params = new URLSearchParams("bin=E+AXQB+A"); console.log(params.get("bin")); // "E AXQB A"
Takeaways
Be cautious of how URLSearchParams handles special characters (e.g. ~) and spaces. Use encodeURIComponent when necessary.
Understand the difference between URL.search, URLSearchParams.get, and URLSearchParams.toString to avoid unexpected behavior.
In Node.js use querystring module if you want to parse duplicate query parameter keys as an array.
The above is the detailed content of Pitfalls of URL and URLSearchParams in JavaScript. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics











Different JavaScript engines have different effects when parsing and executing JavaScript code, because the implementation principles and optimization strategies of each engine differ. 1. Lexical analysis: convert source code into lexical unit. 2. Grammar analysis: Generate an abstract syntax tree. 3. Optimization and compilation: Generate machine code through the JIT compiler. 4. Execute: Run the machine code. V8 engine optimizes through instant compilation and hidden class, SpiderMonkey uses a type inference system, resulting in different performance performance on the same code.

Python is more suitable for beginners, with a smooth learning curve and concise syntax; JavaScript is suitable for front-end development, with a steep learning curve and flexible syntax. 1. Python syntax is intuitive and suitable for data science and back-end development. 2. JavaScript is flexible and widely used in front-end and server-side programming.

The shift from C/C to JavaScript requires adapting to dynamic typing, garbage collection and asynchronous programming. 1) C/C is a statically typed language that requires manual memory management, while JavaScript is dynamically typed and garbage collection is automatically processed. 2) C/C needs to be compiled into machine code, while JavaScript is an interpreted language. 3) JavaScript introduces concepts such as closures, prototype chains and Promise, which enhances flexibility and asynchronous programming capabilities.

The main uses of JavaScript in web development include client interaction, form verification and asynchronous communication. 1) Dynamic content update and user interaction through DOM operations; 2) Client verification is carried out before the user submits data to improve the user experience; 3) Refreshless communication with the server is achieved through AJAX technology.

JavaScript's application in the real world includes front-end and back-end development. 1) Display front-end applications by building a TODO list application, involving DOM operations and event processing. 2) Build RESTfulAPI through Node.js and Express to demonstrate back-end applications.

Understanding how JavaScript engine works internally is important to developers because it helps write more efficient code and understand performance bottlenecks and optimization strategies. 1) The engine's workflow includes three stages: parsing, compiling and execution; 2) During the execution process, the engine will perform dynamic optimization, such as inline cache and hidden classes; 3) Best practices include avoiding global variables, optimizing loops, using const and lets, and avoiding excessive use of closures.

Python and JavaScript have their own advantages and disadvantages in terms of community, libraries and resources. 1) The Python community is friendly and suitable for beginners, but the front-end development resources are not as rich as JavaScript. 2) Python is powerful in data science and machine learning libraries, while JavaScript is better in front-end development libraries and frameworks. 3) Both have rich learning resources, but Python is suitable for starting with official documents, while JavaScript is better with MDNWebDocs. The choice should be based on project needs and personal interests.

Both Python and JavaScript's choices in development environments are important. 1) Python's development environment includes PyCharm, JupyterNotebook and Anaconda, which are suitable for data science and rapid prototyping. 2) The development environment of JavaScript includes Node.js, VSCode and Webpack, which are suitable for front-end and back-end development. Choosing the right tools according to project needs can improve development efficiency and project success rate.
