Go Deep Copy: When Does `gob` Outperform `json`?
Performance Comparison of Object Deep-copying Methods in Go: JSON vs gob
Background
In Go, efficient object deep-copying is crucial for data manipulation and transferring. Two popular methods are encoding/gob and encoding/json. While common wisdom suggests gob should outperform json, some users have encountered unexpected results. This article investigates this anomaly and explores alternative deep-copying approaches.
gob vs json Performance Difference
The performance advantage of gob stems from its custom codec compilation for each data type. However, this process incurs a cost when handling the first value of a given type, as it requires transmitting type definitions along with the data.
Our test with an array type multiplication demonstrates this effect. In the original version, json outperformed gob due to its lack of type-transmission overhead. However, in the modified version with larger arrays, gob became faster as the cost of transmitting type info was amortized over more values.
Testing Methodology
Measuring performance by comparing microsecond execution times as in the provided test code can yield inaccurate results. Go provides built-in testing and benchmark tools that offer more reliable and precise measurements.
Caveats of Reflection-Based Cloning
Both gob and json utilize reflection for cloning, which has limitations:
- It only clones exported fields.
- It often doesn't preserve pointer equality.
- It cannot handle self-referencing structures effectively.
The Proper Cloning Method
The most efficient and reliable method for deep-copying involves creating custom copying logic within the type's package. This ensures accurate field duplication, preserves pointer equality, and accommodates self-referencing structures. While not as convenient, it outperforms generic reflection-based approaches and minimizes memory usage.
The above is the detailed content of Go Deep Copy: When Does `gob` Outperform `json`?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics











Golang is better than Python in terms of performance and scalability. 1) Golang's compilation-type characteristics and efficient concurrency model make it perform well in high concurrency scenarios. 2) Python, as an interpreted language, executes slowly, but can optimize performance through tools such as Cython.

Golang is better than C in concurrency, while C is better than Golang in raw speed. 1) Golang achieves efficient concurrency through goroutine and channel, which is suitable for handling a large number of concurrent tasks. 2)C Through compiler optimization and standard library, it provides high performance close to hardware, suitable for applications that require extreme optimization.

Goimpactsdevelopmentpositivelythroughspeed,efficiency,andsimplicity.1)Speed:Gocompilesquicklyandrunsefficiently,idealforlargeprojects.2)Efficiency:Itscomprehensivestandardlibraryreducesexternaldependencies,enhancingdevelopmentefficiency.3)Simplicity:

Golang and Python each have their own advantages: Golang is suitable for high performance and concurrent programming, while Python is suitable for data science and web development. Golang is known for its concurrency model and efficient performance, while Python is known for its concise syntax and rich library ecosystem.

Golang is suitable for rapid development and concurrent scenarios, and C is suitable for scenarios where extreme performance and low-level control are required. 1) Golang improves performance through garbage collection and concurrency mechanisms, and is suitable for high-concurrency Web service development. 2) C achieves the ultimate performance through manual memory management and compiler optimization, and is suitable for embedded system development.

The performance differences between Golang and C are mainly reflected in memory management, compilation optimization and runtime efficiency. 1) Golang's garbage collection mechanism is convenient but may affect performance, 2) C's manual memory management and compiler optimization are more efficient in recursive computing.

Goisidealforbeginnersandsuitableforcloudandnetworkservicesduetoitssimplicity,efficiency,andconcurrencyfeatures.1)InstallGofromtheofficialwebsiteandverifywith'goversion'.2)Createandrunyourfirstprogramwith'gorunhello.go'.3)Exploreconcurrencyusinggorout

C is more suitable for scenarios where direct control of hardware resources and high performance optimization is required, while Golang is more suitable for scenarios where rapid development and high concurrency processing are required. 1.C's advantage lies in its close to hardware characteristics and high optimization capabilities, which are suitable for high-performance needs such as game development. 2.Golang's advantage lies in its concise syntax and natural concurrency support, which is suitable for high concurrency service development.
