


How to Generate Weighted Random Numbers: Rejection Sampling vs. Iterative Weight Summing?
Generate a Weighted Random Number
Introduction
In various applications, it's often necessary to select a random number from a set of options, where each option is assigned a specific probability of being chosen. This concept is known as generating a weighted random number.
Rejection Sampling Approach
One method of generating weighted random numbers is through rejection sampling. This approach involves creating a lookup table where each option appears as many times as its assigned weight. For example, if option A has an 80% probability, it would appear in the lookup table 80 times. To generate a random number, a random location in the table is selected, and the corresponding option is returned.
Advantages and Disadvantages of Rejection Sampling
Rejection sampling provides constant-time performance for choosing a random number after the lookup table is constructed. However, it requires linear algorithmic performance for building the table, which can be problematic for large sets of options or those with highly precise weights.
Iterative Weight Summing Approach
An alternative approach is iterative weight summing. Here, a random number is generated in the range [0,1) and is compared to the cumulative sum of weights. The option associated with the weight that exceeds the random number is selected as the weighted random number.
Advantages and Disadvantages of Iterative Weight Summing
Compared to rejection sampling, iterative weight summing has no upfront costs but has linear average algorithmic performance in relation to the number of options in the set. It also assumes that the weights sum to one.
Implementation Considerations
When implementing these approaches, it's recommended to create a higher-order function that takes a specification of weights and returns a function that generates weighted random numbers. This allows for reusability and avoids the overhead of building the lookup table or accumulating the weights multiple times.
The above is the detailed content of How to Generate Weighted Random Numbers: Rejection Sampling vs. Iterative Weight Summing?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics











Different JavaScript engines have different effects when parsing and executing JavaScript code, because the implementation principles and optimization strategies of each engine differ. 1. Lexical analysis: convert source code into lexical unit. 2. Grammar analysis: Generate an abstract syntax tree. 3. Optimization and compilation: Generate machine code through the JIT compiler. 4. Execute: Run the machine code. V8 engine optimizes through instant compilation and hidden class, SpiderMonkey uses a type inference system, resulting in different performance performance on the same code.

Python is more suitable for beginners, with a smooth learning curve and concise syntax; JavaScript is suitable for front-end development, with a steep learning curve and flexible syntax. 1. Python syntax is intuitive and suitable for data science and back-end development. 2. JavaScript is flexible and widely used in front-end and server-side programming.

The shift from C/C to JavaScript requires adapting to dynamic typing, garbage collection and asynchronous programming. 1) C/C is a statically typed language that requires manual memory management, while JavaScript is dynamically typed and garbage collection is automatically processed. 2) C/C needs to be compiled into machine code, while JavaScript is an interpreted language. 3) JavaScript introduces concepts such as closures, prototype chains and Promise, which enhances flexibility and asynchronous programming capabilities.

The main uses of JavaScript in web development include client interaction, form verification and asynchronous communication. 1) Dynamic content update and user interaction through DOM operations; 2) Client verification is carried out before the user submits data to improve the user experience; 3) Refreshless communication with the server is achieved through AJAX technology.

JavaScript's application in the real world includes front-end and back-end development. 1) Display front-end applications by building a TODO list application, involving DOM operations and event processing. 2) Build RESTfulAPI through Node.js and Express to demonstrate back-end applications.

Understanding how JavaScript engine works internally is important to developers because it helps write more efficient code and understand performance bottlenecks and optimization strategies. 1) The engine's workflow includes three stages: parsing, compiling and execution; 2) During the execution process, the engine will perform dynamic optimization, such as inline cache and hidden classes; 3) Best practices include avoiding global variables, optimizing loops, using const and lets, and avoiding excessive use of closures.

Python and JavaScript have their own advantages and disadvantages in terms of community, libraries and resources. 1) The Python community is friendly and suitable for beginners, but the front-end development resources are not as rich as JavaScript. 2) Python is powerful in data science and machine learning libraries, while JavaScript is better in front-end development libraries and frameworks. 3) Both have rich learning resources, but Python is suitable for starting with official documents, while JavaScript is better with MDNWebDocs. The choice should be based on project needs and personal interests.

Both Python and JavaScript's choices in development environments are important. 1) Python's development environment includes PyCharm, JupyterNotebook and Anaconda, which are suitable for data science and rapid prototyping. 2) The development environment of JavaScript includes Node.js, VSCode and Webpack, which are suitable for front-end and back-end development. Choosing the right tools according to project needs can improve development efficiency and project success rate.
