Does Go Map Iteration Order Depend on Key Insertion Order?
Assignment Order in Go Maps
Considering the following Go code:
package main import "fmt" type Vertex struct { Lat, Long float64 } var m map[string]Vertex func main() { m = make(map[string]Vertex) m["Bell Labs"] = Vertex{ 40.68433, 74.39967, } m["test"] = Vertex{ 12.0, 100, } fmt.Println(m["Bell Labs"]) fmt.Println(m) }
It outputs:
{40.68433 74.39967} map[Bell Labs:{40.68433 74.39967} test:{12 100}]
Modifying the test vertex declaration by moving the right "}" 4 spaces, as follows:
m["test"] = Vertex{ 12.0, 100, }
Changes the output to:
{40.68433 74.39967} map[test:{12 100} Bell Labs:{40.68433 74.39967}]
Explanation:
Map "order" in Go depends on the randomized hash function used to prevent denial of service attacks. As per the Go issue tracker (http://code.google.com/p/go/issues/detail?id=2630), map order is not guaranteed according to the specification.
According to the specification, a map is an unordered group of elements with unique keys. A future implementation could change the order of a map without modifying it in your code. Therefore, relying on specific map order is not a recommended practice in Go.
The above is the detailed content of Does Go Map Iteration Order Depend on Key Insertion Order?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics











Golang is better than Python in terms of performance and scalability. 1) Golang's compilation-type characteristics and efficient concurrency model make it perform well in high concurrency scenarios. 2) Python, as an interpreted language, executes slowly, but can optimize performance through tools such as Cython.

Golang is better than C in concurrency, while C is better than Golang in raw speed. 1) Golang achieves efficient concurrency through goroutine and channel, which is suitable for handling a large number of concurrent tasks. 2)C Through compiler optimization and standard library, it provides high performance close to hardware, suitable for applications that require extreme optimization.

Goisidealforbeginnersandsuitableforcloudandnetworkservicesduetoitssimplicity,efficiency,andconcurrencyfeatures.1)InstallGofromtheofficialwebsiteandverifywith'goversion'.2)Createandrunyourfirstprogramwith'gorunhello.go'.3)Exploreconcurrencyusinggorout

Golang is suitable for rapid development and concurrent scenarios, and C is suitable for scenarios where extreme performance and low-level control are required. 1) Golang improves performance through garbage collection and concurrency mechanisms, and is suitable for high-concurrency Web service development. 2) C achieves the ultimate performance through manual memory management and compiler optimization, and is suitable for embedded system development.

Goimpactsdevelopmentpositivelythroughspeed,efficiency,andsimplicity.1)Speed:Gocompilesquicklyandrunsefficiently,idealforlargeprojects.2)Efficiency:Itscomprehensivestandardlibraryreducesexternaldependencies,enhancingdevelopmentefficiency.3)Simplicity:

Golang and Python each have their own advantages: Golang is suitable for high performance and concurrent programming, while Python is suitable for data science and web development. Golang is known for its concurrency model and efficient performance, while Python is known for its concise syntax and rich library ecosystem.

The performance differences between Golang and C are mainly reflected in memory management, compilation optimization and runtime efficiency. 1) Golang's garbage collection mechanism is convenient but may affect performance, 2) C's manual memory management and compiler optimization are more efficient in recursive computing.

Golang and C each have their own advantages in performance competitions: 1) Golang is suitable for high concurrency and rapid development, and 2) C provides higher performance and fine-grained control. The selection should be based on project requirements and team technology stack.
