


Awaitable Differences: When Should You `return await promise` vs `return promise`?
Awaitable Differences: return await promise vs return promise
When using asynchronous functions, there are two variations commonly used: return await promise and return promise. While these may seem similar at first glance, there are subtle differences that can impact behavior.
Immediate Resolution vs Awaiting Resolution
The primary difference lies in the timing of promise resolution. In return await promise, the async function waits for the promise to resolve before returning its value. This means that the value returned by the function is the resolved value of the promise.
On the other hand, return promise returns the promise object itself without awaiting its resolution. This allows the caller to handle the promise resolution outside the async function.
Error Handling Within the Async Function
When using return await promise, any errors thrown by the promise will be caught within the async function and bubble up to the caller. This provides a way to handle errors within the same function that initiated the asynchronous operation.
In contrast, when using return promise, errors thrown by the promise will not be caught within the async function and will be propagated to the caller. This requires the caller to handle the errors externally.
Performance Considerations
While both methods have the same observable behavior, the use of return await may have a slightly higher memory footprint. This is because an intermediate Promise object may be created when using return await, which can consume additional memory.
Nested Try-Catch Blocks
The most significant difference between the two variations occurs when the return await or return statements are nested within try-catch blocks. In this case, return await ensures that the async function waits for the promise to resolve before the catch block is executed. This means that the catch block will only execute if an error occurs after the promise has resolved.
In contrast, with return (without await), the promise is returned immediately without awaiting its resolution. Therefore, if an error occurs before the promise resolves, the catch block will execute.
Conclusion
While return await promise and return promise generally have the same observable behavior, the choice between the two depends on the specific use case and error handling requirements. For error handling within the async function, return await promise is preferred. If the caller needs to handle the promise resolution externally or for performance considerations, return promise may be more appropriate.
The above is the detailed content of Awaitable Differences: When Should You `return await promise` vs `return promise`?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics











Python is more suitable for beginners, with a smooth learning curve and concise syntax; JavaScript is suitable for front-end development, with a steep learning curve and flexible syntax. 1. Python syntax is intuitive and suitable for data science and back-end development. 2. JavaScript is flexible and widely used in front-end and server-side programming.

The shift from C/C to JavaScript requires adapting to dynamic typing, garbage collection and asynchronous programming. 1) C/C is a statically typed language that requires manual memory management, while JavaScript is dynamically typed and garbage collection is automatically processed. 2) C/C needs to be compiled into machine code, while JavaScript is an interpreted language. 3) JavaScript introduces concepts such as closures, prototype chains and Promise, which enhances flexibility and asynchronous programming capabilities.

The main uses of JavaScript in web development include client interaction, form verification and asynchronous communication. 1) Dynamic content update and user interaction through DOM operations; 2) Client verification is carried out before the user submits data to improve the user experience; 3) Refreshless communication with the server is achieved through AJAX technology.

JavaScript's application in the real world includes front-end and back-end development. 1) Display front-end applications by building a TODO list application, involving DOM operations and event processing. 2) Build RESTfulAPI through Node.js and Express to demonstrate back-end applications.

Understanding how JavaScript engine works internally is important to developers because it helps write more efficient code and understand performance bottlenecks and optimization strategies. 1) The engine's workflow includes three stages: parsing, compiling and execution; 2) During the execution process, the engine will perform dynamic optimization, such as inline cache and hidden classes; 3) Best practices include avoiding global variables, optimizing loops, using const and lets, and avoiding excessive use of closures.

Python and JavaScript have their own advantages and disadvantages in terms of community, libraries and resources. 1) The Python community is friendly and suitable for beginners, but the front-end development resources are not as rich as JavaScript. 2) Python is powerful in data science and machine learning libraries, while JavaScript is better in front-end development libraries and frameworks. 3) Both have rich learning resources, but Python is suitable for starting with official documents, while JavaScript is better with MDNWebDocs. The choice should be based on project needs and personal interests.

Both Python and JavaScript's choices in development environments are important. 1) Python's development environment includes PyCharm, JupyterNotebook and Anaconda, which are suitable for data science and rapid prototyping. 2) The development environment of JavaScript includes Node.js, VSCode and Webpack, which are suitable for front-end and back-end development. Choosing the right tools according to project needs can improve development efficiency and project success rate.

C and C play a vital role in the JavaScript engine, mainly used to implement interpreters and JIT compilers. 1) C is used to parse JavaScript source code and generate an abstract syntax tree. 2) C is responsible for generating and executing bytecode. 3) C implements the JIT compiler, optimizes and compiles hot-spot code at runtime, and significantly improves the execution efficiency of JavaScript.
