@Resource vs @Autowired: When to Choose Which Dependency Injection Annotation?

@Resource vs @Autowired: A Deeper Dive

In the realm of dependency injection (DI), annotations play a crucial role in establishing relationships between objects. Two widely used annotations are @Resource (from JSR-250) and @Autowired (from the Spring framework). But which annotation should you choose?

@Resource: Name-Based Retrieval

@Resource serves as a mechanism to retrieve a resource by its name. This name can be specified through the "name" parameter of the annotation or inferred from the annotated field or setter's name. By utilizing @Resource, you explicitly request a known resource by its specific identifier.

@Autowired: Type-Based Wiring

On the other hand, @Autowired (or @Inject in Java EE) attempts to wire in a component that matches the required type. It does this by examining the type of the annotated field or setter and searching the application context for a compatible bean. The @Qualifier annotation can be used alongside @Autowired to narrow down the search to specific bean names, if desired.

Conceptual Differences

The fundamental distinction between @Resource and @Autowired lies in their approaches:

• @Resource: Focuses on retrieving a specific resource known by its name.
• @Autowired: Aims to automatically wire in a suitable component based on its type.

Spring's @Resource Behavior

While the JSR-250 specification for @Resource prioritizes name-based retrieval, Spring's implementation of @Resource includes a fallback mechanism. If name-based resolution fails, it defaults to type-based resolution similar to @Autowired. This convenience feature can lead to confusion, as developers may inadvertently use @Resource for type-based autowiring.

The above is the detailed content of @Resource vs @Autowired: When to Choose Which Dependency Injection Annotation?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!