


Watch.Interface, Cache.NewInformer, and Cache.NewSharedIndexInformer: When Should I Choose Which?
Watch.Interface vs. Cache.NewInformer vs. Cache.NewSharedIndexInformer: Differences and When to Use
Kubernetes offers several approaches for monitoring and responding to resource changes within a cluster. These include:
- watch.Interface.ResultChan(): This method allows you to monitor changes to a resource by subscribing to a ResultChan. This channel provides Added/Modified/Deleted events for the resource, giving you real-time updates on its state.
- cache.NewInformer(): A ResourceEventHandler interface can be implemented and passed as the last argument to cache.NewInformer. This sets up an Informer that triggers OnAdd()/OnUpdate()/OnDelete() callbacks within the handler when resource changes occur. It provides both the "before" and "after" states of the resource, making it useful for handling state transitions.
- cache.NewSharedInformer() and cache.NewSharedIndexInformer(): These methods offer a higher level of abstraction by combining the functionality of watch.Interface and cache.NewInformer. They introduce a SharedInformerFactory, which consolidates connections to the API server and shares resources between multiple Informers. Additionally, cache.NewSharedIndexInformer adds indexing to the data cache for efficient retrieval of large datasets.
The choice of API depends on your specific needs. In general, Informers (cache.NewInformer()) are preferred over raw watch.Interface for most use cases. They provide a higher level of abstraction and automate tasks such as filtering and queuing events.
SharedInformers (cache.NewSharedInformer()) offer further optimizations by sharing connections and resources among multiple Informers. SharedIndexInformers (cache.NewSharedIndexInformer()) are particularly useful for handling large datasets, as they enhance search and retrieval efficiency.
For comprehensive resource monitoring, it is recommended to use SharedInformers instantiated from the same SharedInformerFactory. This ensures resource sharing, efficient handling of large datasets, and a consistent view of cluster state.
The above is the detailed content of Watch.Interface, Cache.NewInformer, and Cache.NewSharedIndexInformer: When Should I Choose Which?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics











Golang is better than Python in terms of performance and scalability. 1) Golang's compilation-type characteristics and efficient concurrency model make it perform well in high concurrency scenarios. 2) Python, as an interpreted language, executes slowly, but can optimize performance through tools such as Cython.

Golang is better than C in concurrency, while C is better than Golang in raw speed. 1) Golang achieves efficient concurrency through goroutine and channel, which is suitable for handling a large number of concurrent tasks. 2)C Through compiler optimization and standard library, it provides high performance close to hardware, suitable for applications that require extreme optimization.

Goisidealforbeginnersandsuitableforcloudandnetworkservicesduetoitssimplicity,efficiency,andconcurrencyfeatures.1)InstallGofromtheofficialwebsiteandverifywith'goversion'.2)Createandrunyourfirstprogramwith'gorunhello.go'.3)Exploreconcurrencyusinggorout

Golang is suitable for rapid development and concurrent scenarios, and C is suitable for scenarios where extreme performance and low-level control are required. 1) Golang improves performance through garbage collection and concurrency mechanisms, and is suitable for high-concurrency Web service development. 2) C achieves the ultimate performance through manual memory management and compiler optimization, and is suitable for embedded system development.

Golang and Python each have their own advantages: Golang is suitable for high performance and concurrent programming, while Python is suitable for data science and web development. Golang is known for its concurrency model and efficient performance, while Python is known for its concise syntax and rich library ecosystem.

The performance differences between Golang and C are mainly reflected in memory management, compilation optimization and runtime efficiency. 1) Golang's garbage collection mechanism is convenient but may affect performance, 2) C's manual memory management and compiler optimization are more efficient in recursive computing.

Golang and C each have their own advantages in performance competitions: 1) Golang is suitable for high concurrency and rapid development, and 2) C provides higher performance and fine-grained control. The selection should be based on project requirements and team technology stack.

Golangisidealforbuildingscalablesystemsduetoitsefficiencyandconcurrency,whilePythonexcelsinquickscriptinganddataanalysisduetoitssimplicityandvastecosystem.Golang'sdesignencouragesclean,readablecodeanditsgoroutinesenableefficientconcurrentoperations,t
