Should You Defer `req.Body.Close()` in Net/HTTP Handlers?
Proper Placement of "defer req.Body.Close()"
In Net/HTTP handlers, it is common to see "defer req.Body.Close()" used to close the request body after processing. However, the ideal placement of this statement has been a matter of debate.
Initial Placement vs. End Placement
Some developers argue that it should be placed at the end of the function immediately before the return statement. This ensures that the body is closed in all cases, regardless of whether an error occurs.
Others prefer to place it near the beginning of the function. This approach enables early closure of the body, freeing up resources and potentially preventing unnecessary memory consumption.
HTTP Request Lifecycle
It is important to understand the HTTP request lifecycle to make an informed decision. According to the HTTP/1.1 specification, the server is responsible for closing the request body:
"The server must read and discard any request content sent in the request payload before a reply can be sent."
This implies that the responsibility for closing the body lies primarily with the server, not the handler.
Handler and Server Responsibilities
While it is technically possible to close the request body in the handler, it is generally considered unnecessary. The server will automatically close the body once it has finished processing the request. By explicitly closing the body in the handler unnecessarily, you may interfere with the server's process and introduce potential race conditions.
Therefore, the recommended practice is to omit "defer req.Body.Close()" from your handlers altogether. The server will take care of closing the body as expected, ensuring correct handling of HTTP requests.
The above is the detailed content of Should You Defer `req.Body.Close()` in Net/HTTP Handlers?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics











Go language performs well in building efficient and scalable systems. Its advantages include: 1. High performance: compiled into machine code, fast running speed; 2. Concurrent programming: simplify multitasking through goroutines and channels; 3. Simplicity: concise syntax, reducing learning and maintenance costs; 4. Cross-platform: supports cross-platform compilation, easy deployment.

Golang is better than C in concurrency, while C is better than Golang in raw speed. 1) Golang achieves efficient concurrency through goroutine and channel, which is suitable for handling a large number of concurrent tasks. 2)C Through compiler optimization and standard library, it provides high performance close to hardware, suitable for applications that require extreme optimization.

Golang and Python each have their own advantages: Golang is suitable for high performance and concurrent programming, while Python is suitable for data science and web development. Golang is known for its concurrency model and efficient performance, while Python is known for its concise syntax and rich library ecosystem.

Golang is better than Python in terms of performance and scalability. 1) Golang's compilation-type characteristics and efficient concurrency model make it perform well in high concurrency scenarios. 2) Python, as an interpreted language, executes slowly, but can optimize performance through tools such as Cython.

Golang and C each have their own advantages in performance competitions: 1) Golang is suitable for high concurrency and rapid development, and 2) C provides higher performance and fine-grained control. The selection should be based on project requirements and team technology stack.

Goimpactsdevelopmentpositivelythroughspeed,efficiency,andsimplicity.1)Speed:Gocompilesquicklyandrunsefficiently,idealforlargeprojects.2)Efficiency:Itscomprehensivestandardlibraryreducesexternaldependencies,enhancingdevelopmentefficiency.3)Simplicity:

C is more suitable for scenarios where direct control of hardware resources and high performance optimization is required, while Golang is more suitable for scenarios where rapid development and high concurrency processing are required. 1.C's advantage lies in its close to hardware characteristics and high optimization capabilities, which are suitable for high-performance needs such as game development. 2.Golang's advantage lies in its concise syntax and natural concurrency support, which is suitable for high concurrency service development.

The performance differences between Golang and C are mainly reflected in memory management, compilation optimization and runtime efficiency. 1) Golang's garbage collection mechanism is convenient but may affect performance, 2) C's manual memory management and compiler optimization are more efficient in recursive computing.
