Home Backend Development Golang Is Direct Assignment Faster than Append for Slice Operations in Go?

Is Direct Assignment Faster than Append for Slice Operations in Go?

Nov 10, 2024 am 06:41 AM

Is Direct Assignment Faster than Append for Slice Operations in Go?

Accelerating Slice Append Operations in Go

In Go, slices are crucial data structures that store sequences of values. When appending elements to a slice, it's essential to optimize performance. This article explores the performance difference between two methods of appending to a slice: append and direct assignment (=).

Benchmark Analysis

To compare the performance, we ran two benchmarks using the following code:

func BenchmarkSliceAppend(b *testing.B) {
    a := make([]int, 0, b.N)  // Create an empty slice with sufficient capacity
    for i := 0; i < b.N; i++ {
        a = append(a, i)  // Append i to the slice
    }
}

func BenchmarkSliceSet(b *testing.B) {
    a := make([]int, b.N)  // Create a slice with size b.N
    for i := 0; i < b.N; i++ {
        a[i] = i  // Assign i to the slice's ith element
    }
}
Copy after login

The benchmark results indicate that direct assignment (a[i] = i) is significantly faster than using append:

BenchmarkSliceAppend-4  200000000                7.87 ns/op            8 B/op          0 allocs/op
BenchmarkSliceSet-4     300000000                5.76 ns/op            8 B/op
Copy after login

Why is Assignment Faster than Append?

The performance difference stems from the distinct operations performed by each method:

  • Direct Assignment (a[i] = i): This simply sets the value of the ith element of the slice to i.
  • Append (a = append(a, i)): This function involves a more complex process:

    1. Calls the built-in append function, creating a new slice header and a temporary slice for the variadic parameter.
    2. Reslices the existing slice if it has sufficient capacity.
    3. Assigns i to the last element of the new slice.
    4. Updates the local variable a to reference the new slice.

In summary, each append operation involves additional overhead in copying the slice header and creating temporary slices, whereas direct assignment simply modifies the existing slice element. This overhead contributes to the observed performance difference.

Recommendation

For optimal performance when appending to slices, it's recommended to pre-allocate sufficient capacity using make rather than repeatedly using the append function. This eliminates the need for dynamic memory allocation and reslicing, significantly improving efficiency.

The above is the detailed content of Is Direct Assignment Faster than Append for Slice Operations in Go?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Statement of this Website
The content of this article is voluntarily contributed by netizens, and the copyright belongs to the original author. This site does not assume corresponding legal responsibility. If you find any content suspected of plagiarism or infringement, please contact admin@php.cn

Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress

Undresser.AI Undress

AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover

AI Clothes Remover

Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool

Undress AI Tool

Undress images for free

Clothoff.io

Clothoff.io

AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap

Video Face Swap

Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Roblox: Bubble Gum Simulator Infinity - How To Get And Use Royal Keys
3 weeks ago By 尊渡假赌尊渡假赌尊渡假赌
Nordhold: Fusion System, Explained
3 weeks ago By 尊渡假赌尊渡假赌尊渡假赌
Mandragora: Whispers Of The Witch Tree - How To Unlock The Grappling Hook
3 weeks ago By 尊渡假赌尊渡假赌尊渡假赌

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1

Notepad++7.3.1

Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version

SublimeText3 Chinese version

Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1

Zend Studio 13.0.1

Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6

Dreamweaver CS6

Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version

SublimeText3 Mac version

God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics

Java Tutorial
1666
14
PHP Tutorial
1273
29
C# Tutorial
1254
24
Golang vs. Python: Performance and Scalability Golang vs. Python: Performance and Scalability Apr 19, 2025 am 12:18 AM

Golang is better than Python in terms of performance and scalability. 1) Golang's compilation-type characteristics and efficient concurrency model make it perform well in high concurrency scenarios. 2) Python, as an interpreted language, executes slowly, but can optimize performance through tools such as Cython.

Golang and C  : Concurrency vs. Raw Speed Golang and C : Concurrency vs. Raw Speed Apr 21, 2025 am 12:16 AM

Golang is better than C in concurrency, while C is better than Golang in raw speed. 1) Golang achieves efficient concurrency through goroutine and channel, which is suitable for handling a large number of concurrent tasks. 2)C Through compiler optimization and standard library, it provides high performance close to hardware, suitable for applications that require extreme optimization.

Getting Started with Go: A Beginner's Guide Getting Started with Go: A Beginner's Guide Apr 26, 2025 am 12:21 AM

Goisidealforbeginnersandsuitableforcloudandnetworkservicesduetoitssimplicity,efficiency,andconcurrencyfeatures.1)InstallGofromtheofficialwebsiteandverifywith'goversion'.2)Createandrunyourfirstprogramwith'gorunhello.go'.3)Exploreconcurrencyusinggorout

Golang vs. C  : Performance and Speed Comparison Golang vs. C : Performance and Speed Comparison Apr 21, 2025 am 12:13 AM

Golang is suitable for rapid development and concurrent scenarios, and C is suitable for scenarios where extreme performance and low-level control are required. 1) Golang improves performance through garbage collection and concurrency mechanisms, and is suitable for high-concurrency Web service development. 2) C achieves the ultimate performance through manual memory management and compiler optimization, and is suitable for embedded system development.

Golang's Impact: Speed, Efficiency, and Simplicity Golang's Impact: Speed, Efficiency, and Simplicity Apr 14, 2025 am 12:11 AM

Goimpactsdevelopmentpositivelythroughspeed,efficiency,andsimplicity.1)Speed:Gocompilesquicklyandrunsefficiently,idealforlargeprojects.2)Efficiency:Itscomprehensivestandardlibraryreducesexternaldependencies,enhancingdevelopmentefficiency.3)Simplicity:

C   and Golang: When Performance is Crucial C and Golang: When Performance is Crucial Apr 13, 2025 am 12:11 AM

C is more suitable for scenarios where direct control of hardware resources and high performance optimization is required, while Golang is more suitable for scenarios where rapid development and high concurrency processing are required. 1.C's advantage lies in its close to hardware characteristics and high optimization capabilities, which are suitable for high-performance needs such as game development. 2.Golang's advantage lies in its concise syntax and natural concurrency support, which is suitable for high concurrency service development.

Golang vs. Python: Key Differences and Similarities Golang vs. Python: Key Differences and Similarities Apr 17, 2025 am 12:15 AM

Golang and Python each have their own advantages: Golang is suitable for high performance and concurrent programming, while Python is suitable for data science and web development. Golang is known for its concurrency model and efficient performance, while Python is known for its concise syntax and rich library ecosystem.

Golang and C  : The Trade-offs in Performance Golang and C : The Trade-offs in Performance Apr 17, 2025 am 12:18 AM

The performance differences between Golang and C are mainly reflected in memory management, compilation optimization and runtime efficiency. 1) Golang's garbage collection mechanism is convenient but may affect performance, 2) C's manual memory management and compiler optimization are more efficient in recursive computing.

See all articles