


Why does sharing variables in Go lead to different outputs depending on their scope within anonymous functions?
Sharing Variables in Go: Understanding the Difference Between Two Cases
In Go, goroutines are lightweight concurrent tasks that can share memory and communicate using channels. Variable sharing among goroutines requires careful handling to avoid data race issues.
Consider the following Go program:
<code class="go">package main import ( "fmt" "sync" ) func main() { var wg sync.WaitGroup for i := 0; i < 5; i++ { wg.Add(1) x := i go func() { defer wg.Done() fmt.Println(x) }() } wg.Wait() fmt.Println("Done") }</code>
When executed, this program prints the expected output:
4 0 1 3 2
In this case, each goroutine has its own copy of the variable x, which is initialized with the current value of i when the goroutine is created. This is because x is declared within the anonymous function, and its scope is limited to that function.
Now, consider a slight modification to the program:
<code class="go">package main import ( "fmt" "sync" ) func main() { var wg sync.WaitGroup for i := 0; i < 5; i++ { wg.Add(1) go func() { defer wg.Done() fmt.Println(i) }() } wg.Wait() fmt.Println("Done") }</code>
This time, the output becomes:
5 5 5 5 5
The explanation lies in the way the variable i is used in the goroutine. Since i is declared outside the anonymous function, it's shared among all goroutines. In this case, when each goroutine executes fmt.Println(i), it's printing the final value of i, which is 5.
To verify this, we can add printing of the memory addresses of x and i within the goroutines. The output shows that x has different addresses for each goroutine, while i has the same address for all goroutines:
0xc0420301e0 0xc0420301f8 0xc0420301e8 0xc0420301f0 0xc042030200 0xc042030208
In conclusion, the difference in variable sharing between the two cases arises from the scope of the variable declared in the anonymous function. When a variable is declared within the anonymous function, it's private to that goroutine. On the other hand, a variable declared outside the anonymous function is shared among all goroutines.
The above is the detailed content of Why does sharing variables in Go lead to different outputs depending on their scope within anonymous functions?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics

Go language performs well in building efficient and scalable systems. Its advantages include: 1. High performance: compiled into machine code, fast running speed; 2. Concurrent programming: simplify multitasking through goroutines and channels; 3. Simplicity: concise syntax, reducing learning and maintenance costs; 4. Cross-platform: supports cross-platform compilation, easy deployment.

Golang is better than C in concurrency, while C is better than Golang in raw speed. 1) Golang achieves efficient concurrency through goroutine and channel, which is suitable for handling a large number of concurrent tasks. 2)C Through compiler optimization and standard library, it provides high performance close to hardware, suitable for applications that require extreme optimization.

Golang and C each have their own advantages in performance competitions: 1) Golang is suitable for high concurrency and rapid development, and 2) C provides higher performance and fine-grained control. The selection should be based on project requirements and team technology stack.

Golang is better than Python in terms of performance and scalability. 1) Golang's compilation-type characteristics and efficient concurrency model make it perform well in high concurrency scenarios. 2) Python, as an interpreted language, executes slowly, but can optimize performance through tools such as Cython.

Golang and Python each have their own advantages: Golang is suitable for high performance and concurrent programming, while Python is suitable for data science and web development. Golang is known for its concurrency model and efficient performance, while Python is known for its concise syntax and rich library ecosystem.

C is more suitable for scenarios where direct control of hardware resources and high performance optimization is required, while Golang is more suitable for scenarios where rapid development and high concurrency processing are required. 1.C's advantage lies in its close to hardware characteristics and high optimization capabilities, which are suitable for high-performance needs such as game development. 2.Golang's advantage lies in its concise syntax and natural concurrency support, which is suitable for high concurrency service development.

Goimpactsdevelopmentpositivelythroughspeed,efficiency,andsimplicity.1)Speed:Gocompilesquicklyandrunsefficiently,idealforlargeprojects.2)Efficiency:Itscomprehensivestandardlibraryreducesexternaldependencies,enhancingdevelopmentefficiency.3)Simplicity:

The performance differences between Golang and C are mainly reflected in memory management, compilation optimization and runtime efficiency. 1) Golang's garbage collection mechanism is convenient but may affect performance, 2) C's manual memory management and compiler optimization are more efficient in recursive computing.
