Visualizing Lotto Data: Germany's numbers as heat map.
Hello, DEV community! ?
This is my very first article on DEV, and I'm excited to share a project that combines my love of data visualization with a dash of playful speculation. Have you ever wondered if some lottery numbers are “luckier” than others? Or if patterns in what should be purely random events might hint at something deeper about the nature of reality?
Ever wondered if certain lottery numbers are more likely to hit the jackpot than others? Or if patterns in random events could hint at something deeper about the nature of reality? I recently developed a lotto activity app to visualize historical lottery data in Germany, and it’s shown some fascinating patterns. In this article, I’ll take you through how it works and explore a fun, speculative question: could these “lucky” and “unlucky” numbers be a clue that we’re living in a simulation? ?
What the App Does
The app visualizes the frequency of lotto numbers drawn in Germany, presenting the data as a heat map across multiple years and for all years combined. It’s designed to help spot trends—are certain numbers “luckier” than others over time? Here’s how it’s set up:
How the Data is Processed
The app pulls in all historical lotto draws in Germany, dating back to when the lottery first started. Using this data, it calculates:
- Main Numbers (1-49): The core numbers drawn in each game.
- Super Numbers (0-9): A bonus number in the German lottery system, offering extra prize potential.
The app then generates heat maps for each year and for all years combined, showing the frequency of each number. Darker colors represent numbers that have been drawn more often, and lighter colors (or absence of color) mark the less frequently drawn numbers.
Identifying the Hottest and Coldest Numbers
In addition to visualizing each year individually, the app provides an "all-years" view that summarizes the “Top 6” and “Bottom 6” numbers based on their historical draw frequency. It’s easy to see which numbers are consistently drawn and which seem almost ignored by the lotto gods.
For example:
- Top 6 Numbers: The most frequently drawn numbers over time 6 with a total of 6 5 4 extractions so far 26 with a total of 6 26
- Bottom 6 Numbers: The least frequently drawn numbers
- Hottest Super Number: The most frequently drawn super number, which happens to be 7.
- Coldest Super Number: The least frequently drawn super number, 8 and this one is also among the coldest lotto numbers.
These patterns make for interesting insights into what people might consider “lucky” and “unlucky” numbers.
Observing Patterns in the Chaos: Luck or Something Else?
Here’s where things get interesting. Lottery numbers are supposed to be random, and in theory, each number should have roughly the same chance of being drawn over time. But the heat maps show certain numbers cropping up more often than others. Could this be mere coincidence, or might it hint at something more… “programmed”?
Speculative Question: Are We Living in a Simulation?
This brings us to a fun, speculative question inspired by the simulation hypothesis. The simulation hypothesis, popularized by thinkers like Nick Bostrom, suggests that our reality might be a simulated construct—an advanced program, if you will, created by some future civilization.
If we were living in a simulation, could patterns like the consistent “luckiness” of certain numbers be seen as evidence? Maybe it’s a glitch, a bit of residual code, or even a feature programmed to give us something to wonder about. Why is 7 so lucky as a super number? Why is 13 and 8 so unlucky? Are these numbers arbitrary quirks, or do they hint at something beyond pure randomness? Why are the representation of these three numbers also so similar to one another ?
Of course, this is just playful speculation and I am pretty sure that in the next couple of hundred draws this will be the case. But there’s something oddly compelling about seeing recurring patterns in what should, by all accounts, be random events.
Want to Check It Out?
If you’re curious about the app or want to dive into the code, it’s available on GitHub: lotto-activity-graph. Feel free to play around, look for your own patterns, or even contribute!
Final Thoughts
In the end, the app is primarily a tool for data visualization, but it also opens up an interesting conversation about randomness, probability, and how we interpret patterns. Whether or not we’re living in a simulation, there’s something fascinating about finding meaning—even if it’s just for fun—in the chaos of the lotto.
Thanks for reading! Let me know what you think about the app, or share your own thoughts on patterns in randomness. Are they just coincidence, or could they hint at something more?
The above is the detailed content of Visualizing Lotto Data: Germany's numbers as heat map.. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics











Different JavaScript engines have different effects when parsing and executing JavaScript code, because the implementation principles and optimization strategies of each engine differ. 1. Lexical analysis: convert source code into lexical unit. 2. Grammar analysis: Generate an abstract syntax tree. 3. Optimization and compilation: Generate machine code through the JIT compiler. 4. Execute: Run the machine code. V8 engine optimizes through instant compilation and hidden class, SpiderMonkey uses a type inference system, resulting in different performance performance on the same code.

Python is more suitable for beginners, with a smooth learning curve and concise syntax; JavaScript is suitable for front-end development, with a steep learning curve and flexible syntax. 1. Python syntax is intuitive and suitable for data science and back-end development. 2. JavaScript is flexible and widely used in front-end and server-side programming.

The shift from C/C to JavaScript requires adapting to dynamic typing, garbage collection and asynchronous programming. 1) C/C is a statically typed language that requires manual memory management, while JavaScript is dynamically typed and garbage collection is automatically processed. 2) C/C needs to be compiled into machine code, while JavaScript is an interpreted language. 3) JavaScript introduces concepts such as closures, prototype chains and Promise, which enhances flexibility and asynchronous programming capabilities.

The main uses of JavaScript in web development include client interaction, form verification and asynchronous communication. 1) Dynamic content update and user interaction through DOM operations; 2) Client verification is carried out before the user submits data to improve the user experience; 3) Refreshless communication with the server is achieved through AJAX technology.

JavaScript's application in the real world includes front-end and back-end development. 1) Display front-end applications by building a TODO list application, involving DOM operations and event processing. 2) Build RESTfulAPI through Node.js and Express to demonstrate back-end applications.

Understanding how JavaScript engine works internally is important to developers because it helps write more efficient code and understand performance bottlenecks and optimization strategies. 1) The engine's workflow includes three stages: parsing, compiling and execution; 2) During the execution process, the engine will perform dynamic optimization, such as inline cache and hidden classes; 3) Best practices include avoiding global variables, optimizing loops, using const and lets, and avoiding excessive use of closures.

Python and JavaScript have their own advantages and disadvantages in terms of community, libraries and resources. 1) The Python community is friendly and suitable for beginners, but the front-end development resources are not as rich as JavaScript. 2) Python is powerful in data science and machine learning libraries, while JavaScript is better in front-end development libraries and frameworks. 3) Both have rich learning resources, but Python is suitable for starting with official documents, while JavaScript is better with MDNWebDocs. The choice should be based on project needs and personal interests.

Both Python and JavaScript's choices in development environments are important. 1) Python's development environment includes PyCharm, JupyterNotebook and Anaconda, which are suitable for data science and rapid prototyping. 2) The development environment of JavaScript includes Node.js, VSCode and Webpack, which are suitable for front-end and back-end development. Choosing the right tools according to project needs can improve development efficiency and project success rate.
