


How to Achieve Efficient Low-Cost Trace Logging in Go Without Performance Overhead?
Low-Cost Trace Logging in Go: Disabling Log Statements Without Performance Overhead
The ability to add debugging log statements to critical paths without impacting production performance is crucial. In Go, however, the cost of evaluating arguments for disabled statements can be significant.
The Tailored Logger
To address this, an EnabledLogger can be created, implementing the log.Logger interface and delegating output to a log.Logger only when enabled. This effectively hides the formatting and logging operations when disabled.
The Limitations of EnabledLogger
While the EnabledLogger minimizes evaluation cost for simple data types, it doesn't handle arbitrary function calls or complex expressions within log statements. To mitigate this, two options are available:
Wrapper Types:
Wrapper types like Stringify can defer function calls to be evaluated only when enabled. Although verbose, this approach ensures that the formatting is delayed until execution.
Manual Checks:
Explicit checks can also be used to perform the formatting conditionally, but this is error-prone and requires careful attention to ensure consistency.
Alternative Solutions
In addition to these options, other approaches include:
Formatter Interfaces:
fmt.Stringer and fmt.GoStringer can be leveraged to defer formatting for types that implement these interfaces.
Custom Loggers:
Overriding the default logger with a custom logger at runtime allows for finer control over the data evaluation.
Logger as a Boolean:
A simple yet effective technique is to use a bool value as the logger itself, simplifying the code by eliminating the need for if statements.
Code Generation:
Preprocessing macros can be emulated in Go using code generation, generating debug builds that include only the necessary tracing statements.
The above is the detailed content of How to Achieve Efficient Low-Cost Trace Logging in Go Without Performance Overhead?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics











Golang is better than Python in terms of performance and scalability. 1) Golang's compilation-type characteristics and efficient concurrency model make it perform well in high concurrency scenarios. 2) Python, as an interpreted language, executes slowly, but can optimize performance through tools such as Cython.

Golang is better than C in concurrency, while C is better than Golang in raw speed. 1) Golang achieves efficient concurrency through goroutine and channel, which is suitable for handling a large number of concurrent tasks. 2)C Through compiler optimization and standard library, it provides high performance close to hardware, suitable for applications that require extreme optimization.

Goisidealforbeginnersandsuitableforcloudandnetworkservicesduetoitssimplicity,efficiency,andconcurrencyfeatures.1)InstallGofromtheofficialwebsiteandverifywith'goversion'.2)Createandrunyourfirstprogramwith'gorunhello.go'.3)Exploreconcurrencyusinggorout

Golang is suitable for rapid development and concurrent scenarios, and C is suitable for scenarios where extreme performance and low-level control are required. 1) Golang improves performance through garbage collection and concurrency mechanisms, and is suitable for high-concurrency Web service development. 2) C achieves the ultimate performance through manual memory management and compiler optimization, and is suitable for embedded system development.

Goimpactsdevelopmentpositivelythroughspeed,efficiency,andsimplicity.1)Speed:Gocompilesquicklyandrunsefficiently,idealforlargeprojects.2)Efficiency:Itscomprehensivestandardlibraryreducesexternaldependencies,enhancingdevelopmentefficiency.3)Simplicity:

Golang and Python each have their own advantages: Golang is suitable for high performance and concurrent programming, while Python is suitable for data science and web development. Golang is known for its concurrency model and efficient performance, while Python is known for its concise syntax and rich library ecosystem.

The performance differences between Golang and C are mainly reflected in memory management, compilation optimization and runtime efficiency. 1) Golang's garbage collection mechanism is convenient but may affect performance, 2) C's manual memory management and compiler optimization are more efficient in recursive computing.

Golang and C each have their own advantages in performance competitions: 1) Golang is suitable for high concurrency and rapid development, and 2) C provides higher performance and fine-grained control. The selection should be based on project requirements and team technology stack.
