


Why Does `xml.NewDecoder()` Throw an EOF Error After Reading the HTTP Response Body?
XML Decoding Error with xml.NewDecoder() After Reading Body Content
When attempting to decode XML from a HTTP response body, developers may encounter an EOF (end-of-file) error with xml.NewDecoder(). This error typically occurs if the body content has already been read or processed.
The provided code sample includes a section where the response body is first read using ioutil.ReadAll(). This action consumes the entire body content, making it unavailable for subsequent operations. Consequently, when xml.NewDecoder() is used to read the body, it reaches the end of the file and triggers the EOF error.
To avoid this error, it is recommended to cache the response body content into a variable before performing any read operations. This allows other functions, such as xml.NewDecoder(), to access the content without triggering the EOF error.
Sample Code Modification:
<code class="go">var bodyContent []byte resp1, err := client.Do(req1) error_handler(err) defer resp1.Body.Close() bodyContent, err = ioutil.ReadAll(resp1.Body) error_handler(err) resp1.Body = ioutil.NopCloser(bytes.NewBuffer(bodyContent)) if err := xml.NewDecoder(resp1.Body).Decode(&v); err != nil { fmt.Printf("error is : %v", err) return }</code>
By introducing the bodyContent variable and updating the resp1.Body, the content can be reused for both actions. This approach eliminates the EOF error and allows for successful XML decoding.
The above is the detailed content of Why Does `xml.NewDecoder()` Throw an EOF Error After Reading the HTTP Response Body?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics











Go language performs well in building efficient and scalable systems. Its advantages include: 1. High performance: compiled into machine code, fast running speed; 2. Concurrent programming: simplify multitasking through goroutines and channels; 3. Simplicity: concise syntax, reducing learning and maintenance costs; 4. Cross-platform: supports cross-platform compilation, easy deployment.

Golang is better than Python in terms of performance and scalability. 1) Golang's compilation-type characteristics and efficient concurrency model make it perform well in high concurrency scenarios. 2) Python, as an interpreted language, executes slowly, but can optimize performance through tools such as Cython.

Golang is better than C in concurrency, while C is better than Golang in raw speed. 1) Golang achieves efficient concurrency through goroutine and channel, which is suitable for handling a large number of concurrent tasks. 2)C Through compiler optimization and standard library, it provides high performance close to hardware, suitable for applications that require extreme optimization.

Goimpactsdevelopmentpositivelythroughspeed,efficiency,andsimplicity.1)Speed:Gocompilesquicklyandrunsefficiently,idealforlargeprojects.2)Efficiency:Itscomprehensivestandardlibraryreducesexternaldependencies,enhancingdevelopmentefficiency.3)Simplicity:

Golang and Python each have their own advantages: Golang is suitable for high performance and concurrent programming, while Python is suitable for data science and web development. Golang is known for its concurrency model and efficient performance, while Python is known for its concise syntax and rich library ecosystem.

The performance differences between Golang and C are mainly reflected in memory management, compilation optimization and runtime efficiency. 1) Golang's garbage collection mechanism is convenient but may affect performance, 2) C's manual memory management and compiler optimization are more efficient in recursive computing.

Golang is suitable for rapid development and concurrent scenarios, and C is suitable for scenarios where extreme performance and low-level control are required. 1) Golang improves performance through garbage collection and concurrency mechanisms, and is suitable for high-concurrency Web service development. 2) C achieves the ultimate performance through manual memory management and compiler optimization, and is suitable for embedded system development.

Golang and C each have their own advantages in performance competitions: 1) Golang is suitable for high concurrency and rapid development, and 2) C provides higher performance and fine-grained control. The selection should be based on project requirements and team technology stack.
