


How can I derive the correct public key and signature from a prehashed private key using the Go package golang.org/x/crypto/ed25519?
Ed25519 Public Key Discrepancy
Problem Description:
Using the Go package golang.org/x/crypto/ed25519, attempts to derive the public key from a given private key produce a different result compared to the expected public key as defined in a given test case.
Root Cause:
The discrepancy arises from the use of different ed25519 private key formats.
Private Key Format Difference:
- The Go package expects a private key format that consists of the 32-byte seed concatenated with the 32-byte public key.
- The test case uses a private key format that is the 64-byte result of a hash applied to the seed (or possibly 64 random bytes used as a substitute).
Solution:
Since reversing the hash used to generate the test case private keys is not feasible, conversion to a format compatible with the Go package is not possible.
Proposed Solution:
To obtain the correct public key for the test case, a modified version of the Go package can be created that utilizes the following custom functions:
getPublicKey:
<code class="go">// GetPublicKey generates the public key from the prehashed private key. func getPublicKey(privateKey []byte) []byte { var A edwards25519.ExtendedGroupElement var hBytes [32]byte copy(hBytes[:], privateKey) edwards25519.GeScalarMultBase(&A, &hBytes) var publicKeyBytes [32]byte A.ToBytes(&publicKeyBytes) return publicKeyBytes[:] }</code>
sign:
<code class="go">// Sign generates a signature from the prehashed private key, public key, and message. func sign(privateKey, publicKey, message []byte) []byte { var privateKeyA [32]byte copy(privateKeyA[:], privateKey) var messageDigest, hramDigest [64]byte h := sha512.New() h.Write(privateKey[32:]) h.Write(message) h.Sum(messageDigest[:0]) var messageDigestReduced [32]byte edwards25519.ScReduce(&messageDigestReduced, &messageDigest) var R edwards25519.ExtendedGroupElement edwards25519.GeScalarMultBase(&R, &messageDigestReduced) var encodedR [32]byte R.ToBytes(&encodedR) h.Reset() h.Write(encodedR[:]) h.Write(publicKey) h.Write(message) h.Sum(hramDigest[:0]) var hramDigestReduced [32]byte edwards25519.ScReduce(&hramDigestReduced, &hramDigest) var s [32]byte edwards25519.ScMulAdd(&s, &hramDigestReduced, &privateKeyA, &messageDigestReduced) signature := make([]byte, 64) copy(signature[:], encodedR[:]) copy(signature[32:], s[:]) return signature }</code>
Usage Example:
<code class="go">privateKeyHex := "e06d3183d14159228433ed599221b80bd0a5ce8352e4bdf0262f76786ef1c74db7e7a9fea2c0eb269d61e3b38e450a22e754941ac78479d6c54e1faf6037881d" privateKey, _ := hex.DecodeString(privateKeyHex) expectedPublicKey := "77ff84905a91936367c01360803104f92432fcd904a43511876df5cdf3e7e548" expectedSig := "6834284b6b24c3204eb2fea824d82f88883a3d95e8b4a21b8c0ded553d17d17ddf9a8a7104b1258f30bed3787e6cb896fca78c58f8e03b5f18f14951a87d9a08" publicKey := getPublicKey(privateKey) fmt.Printf("Calculated Public Key: %x\n", publicKey) fmt.Printf("Expected Public Key: %s\n", expectedPublicKey) calculatedSig := sign(privateKey, publicKey, []byte("Hello, World!")) fmt.Printf("Calculated Signature: %x\n", calculatedSig) fmt.Printf("Expected Signature: %s\n", expectedSig)</code>
This approach allows for the calculation of the correct public key and signature using the modified Go package, as specified in the test case.
The above is the detailed content of How can I derive the correct public key and signature from a prehashed private key using the Go package golang.org/x/crypto/ed25519?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics











Golang is better than Python in terms of performance and scalability. 1) Golang's compilation-type characteristics and efficient concurrency model make it perform well in high concurrency scenarios. 2) Python, as an interpreted language, executes slowly, but can optimize performance through tools such as Cython.

Golang is better than C in concurrency, while C is better than Golang in raw speed. 1) Golang achieves efficient concurrency through goroutine and channel, which is suitable for handling a large number of concurrent tasks. 2)C Through compiler optimization and standard library, it provides high performance close to hardware, suitable for applications that require extreme optimization.

Goisidealforbeginnersandsuitableforcloudandnetworkservicesduetoitssimplicity,efficiency,andconcurrencyfeatures.1)InstallGofromtheofficialwebsiteandverifywith'goversion'.2)Createandrunyourfirstprogramwith'gorunhello.go'.3)Exploreconcurrencyusinggorout

Golang is suitable for rapid development and concurrent scenarios, and C is suitable for scenarios where extreme performance and low-level control are required. 1) Golang improves performance through garbage collection and concurrency mechanisms, and is suitable for high-concurrency Web service development. 2) C achieves the ultimate performance through manual memory management and compiler optimization, and is suitable for embedded system development.

Goimpactsdevelopmentpositivelythroughspeed,efficiency,andsimplicity.1)Speed:Gocompilesquicklyandrunsefficiently,idealforlargeprojects.2)Efficiency:Itscomprehensivestandardlibraryreducesexternaldependencies,enhancingdevelopmentefficiency.3)Simplicity:

Golang and Python each have their own advantages: Golang is suitable for high performance and concurrent programming, while Python is suitable for data science and web development. Golang is known for its concurrency model and efficient performance, while Python is known for its concise syntax and rich library ecosystem.

The performance differences between Golang and C are mainly reflected in memory management, compilation optimization and runtime efficiency. 1) Golang's garbage collection mechanism is convenient but may affect performance, 2) C's manual memory management and compiler optimization are more efficient in recursive computing.

Golang and C each have their own advantages in performance competitions: 1) Golang is suitable for high concurrency and rapid development, and 2) C provides higher performance and fine-grained control. The selection should be based on project requirements and team technology stack.
