Let's Make Jest Run Much Faster
But first, we need to understand why it is so slow.
Practical Example
Consider a simple React component.
import React from "react"; import { deepClone } from "./utils"; export function App() { const obj = { foo: 'bar' }; return ( <div> <p>Object looks like this: {JSON.stringify(deepClone(obj))}</p> </div> ); }
App component depends only on one utility function - deepClone. The utils file looks like this.
import _ from 'lodash'; import moment from 'moment'; import * as mui from '@mui/material'; export const deepClone = (obj) => _.cloneDeep(obj); export const getFormattedDate = (date) => moment(date).format('YYYY-MM-DD'); export const isButton = (instance) => instance === mui.Button;
It exports three one-line helper functions. That's it.
Now, here's a big question: How long do you think it will take to execute this test?
import React from "react"; import { render, screen } from "@testing-library/react"; import { App } from "./app"; import "@testing-library/jest-dom"; test("renders the app", () => { render(<App />); });
The answer? An eternity!
PASS src/tests/react-app/react-app.test.js √ renders the date and sum correctly (25 ms) Test Suites: 1 passed, 1 total Tests: 1 passed, 1 total Snapshots: 0 total Time: 5.045 s
It took 5 seconds on my machine, to execute a one-liner test case for a one-liner React component.
Analyzing Performance
To analyze what is happening behind the scenes, we can use either Chrome's profiler - I recommend watching this insightful video by Kent C. Dodds.
Alternatively, you can use a jest-neat-runner library, which simplifies the profiling process. Set the NEAT_REPORT_MODULE_LOAD_ABOVE_MS option to 150 and enable NEAT_REPORT_TRANSFORM. This configuration will print out the modules that take more than 150ms to load and provide information on how long it took to process (open and transpile) the files.
Let's use the latter. This is the output.
> jest src/tests/react-app/ From src\tests\react-app\utils.js -> @mui/material in 1759ms From node_modules\@mui\material\node\styles\adaptV4Theme.js -> @mui/system in 509ms From src\tests\react-app\react-app.test.js -> @testing-library/react in 317ms From node_modules\@testing-library\react\dist\pure.js -> @testing-library/dom in 266ms From node_modules\@mui\system\ThemeProvider\ThemeProvider.js -> @mui/private-theming in 166ms From node_modules\@testing-library\dom\dist\role-helpers.js -> aria-query in 161ms
We're loading "@mui/material" library for almost 2 seconds without even using it!
Root Cause In Many Projects?
Messy Dependencies
In my experience, performance problems with jest mainly stem from the large number of transitive dependencies that aren't even used at runtime. As showcased in our example above, if you don't pay enough attention to what files you import into your application, you might end up in the same situation as me.
In my case, the App component only depends on the deepClone utility function. However, since deepClone is exported from the utils file, all the dependencies within the utils file were also loaded along with it.
Files that contain a lot of loosely related functions and heavy dependencies might significantly slow down your application and tests.
Barrel Files
Jest is not a friend with ESM modules, which leads it to fallback to CommonJS. Consequently, tree-shaking doesn't function correctly. This is particularly problematic when relying on modules imported from barrel files (index files).
For instance, when you import a small component or function from a barrel file, Jest will load everything else as well - which obviously causes an unnecessary overhead.
What Now?
Adjusting the Import Strategy Manually
Aside from removing the barrel files and refactoring the entire codebase by breaking up files with numerous dependencies into smaller, more focused modules. We can identify modules that take a long time to load and look for smaller alternative modules or check if the imported module exports individual parts separately (i.e., named imports) instead of using the barrel file.
Meaning, instead of
import React from "react"; import { deepClone } from "./utils"; export function App() { const obj = { foo: 'bar' }; return ( <div> <p>Object looks like this: {JSON.stringify(deepClone(obj))}</p> </div> ); }
do
import _ from 'lodash'; import moment from 'moment'; import * as mui from '@mui/material'; export const deepClone = (obj) => _.cloneDeep(obj); export const getFormattedDate = (date) => moment(date).format('YYYY-MM-DD'); export const isButton = (instance) => instance === mui.Button;
If we're not using the module at all, we can mock it via jest.mock to avoid loading it completely.
However, these adjustments can be quite time-consuming.
Runtime Cache Approach
A more effective method involves using the jest-neat-runner library with the NEAT_RUNTIME_CACHE option. When this option is on, the library tracks the real runtime usage of all modules (per test file) and stores dependencies that we do not need for subsequent test runs into a cache. Let me show what it does on the example above
import React from "react"; import { render, screen } from "@testing-library/react"; import { App } from "./app"; import "@testing-library/jest-dom"; test("renders the app", () => { render(<App />); });
We reduced the execution time from five seconds to two by skipping the loading of 26 unnecessary libraries, including the MUI library.
Be cautious - there are several caveats when using NEAT_RUNTIME_CACHE, so make sure to read the README before using it.
Other Optimization Techniques
Transpilation optimisations: Examine how many files need to be transpiled and use the most effective transpiler (like SWC or esbuild). If you want to save time, the NEAT_REPORT_TRANSFORM option in jest-neat-runner will provide detailed information on how much time and how many modules it takes to transpile.
Caching Modules in Memory: By default, Jest does not cache modules in memory, meaning every test run must open, parse, and load the module into memory. If you have a vast suite of tests and enough memory, consider using the NEAT_TRANSFORM_CACHE option to speed things up.
What About the CI Pipeline?
Parallel Runs: CircleCI and GitHub Actions support parallel runs. This means you can spin up more machines and divide the load using the shard parameter in Jest.
Storing the Jest and Neat Cache: This is crucial for taking advantage of Jest and jest-neat-runner in the CI. Be sure to set the cacheDirectory option in Jest. Then, store the directory after the test run, and restore the cache before running the tests. Caveat: If you're using parallelism, ensure you store unique caches for each node. For instance, CircleCI exposes the CIRCLE_NODE_INDEX environment variable, which you can leverage when storing the cache. This is how it looks in the CircleCI.
import React from "react"; import { deepClone } from "./utils"; export function App() { const obj = { foo: 'bar' }; return ( <div> <p>Object looks like this: {JSON.stringify(deepClone(obj))}</p> </div> ); }
By following these guidelines, you can significantly enhance Jest's performance in your projects.
The above is the detailed content of Let's Make Jest Run Much Faster. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics











Different JavaScript engines have different effects when parsing and executing JavaScript code, because the implementation principles and optimization strategies of each engine differ. 1. Lexical analysis: convert source code into lexical unit. 2. Grammar analysis: Generate an abstract syntax tree. 3. Optimization and compilation: Generate machine code through the JIT compiler. 4. Execute: Run the machine code. V8 engine optimizes through instant compilation and hidden class, SpiderMonkey uses a type inference system, resulting in different performance performance on the same code.

Python is more suitable for beginners, with a smooth learning curve and concise syntax; JavaScript is suitable for front-end development, with a steep learning curve and flexible syntax. 1. Python syntax is intuitive and suitable for data science and back-end development. 2. JavaScript is flexible and widely used in front-end and server-side programming.

The shift from C/C to JavaScript requires adapting to dynamic typing, garbage collection and asynchronous programming. 1) C/C is a statically typed language that requires manual memory management, while JavaScript is dynamically typed and garbage collection is automatically processed. 2) C/C needs to be compiled into machine code, while JavaScript is an interpreted language. 3) JavaScript introduces concepts such as closures, prototype chains and Promise, which enhances flexibility and asynchronous programming capabilities.

The main uses of JavaScript in web development include client interaction, form verification and asynchronous communication. 1) Dynamic content update and user interaction through DOM operations; 2) Client verification is carried out before the user submits data to improve the user experience; 3) Refreshless communication with the server is achieved through AJAX technology.

JavaScript's application in the real world includes front-end and back-end development. 1) Display front-end applications by building a TODO list application, involving DOM operations and event processing. 2) Build RESTfulAPI through Node.js and Express to demonstrate back-end applications.

Understanding how JavaScript engine works internally is important to developers because it helps write more efficient code and understand performance bottlenecks and optimization strategies. 1) The engine's workflow includes three stages: parsing, compiling and execution; 2) During the execution process, the engine will perform dynamic optimization, such as inline cache and hidden classes; 3) Best practices include avoiding global variables, optimizing loops, using const and lets, and avoiding excessive use of closures.

Python and JavaScript have their own advantages and disadvantages in terms of community, libraries and resources. 1) The Python community is friendly and suitable for beginners, but the front-end development resources are not as rich as JavaScript. 2) Python is powerful in data science and machine learning libraries, while JavaScript is better in front-end development libraries and frameworks. 3) Both have rich learning resources, but Python is suitable for starting with official documents, while JavaScript is better with MDNWebDocs. The choice should be based on project needs and personal interests.

Both Python and JavaScript's choices in development environments are important. 1) Python's development environment includes PyCharm, JupyterNotebook and Anaconda, which are suitable for data science and rapid prototyping. 2) The development environment of JavaScript includes Node.js, VSCode and Webpack, which are suitable for front-end and back-end development. Choosing the right tools according to project needs can improve development efficiency and project success rate.
