Table of Contents
Dynamically Parsing YAML Fields to Specific Structs in Go
The Challenge
Solution
Updated Approaches for YAML v3
Home Backend Development Golang How do you dynamically parse YAML fields into specific structs in Go without using an intermediate map?

How do you dynamically parse YAML fields into specific structs in Go without using an intermediate map?

Oct 31, 2024 am 01:47 AM

How do you dynamically parse YAML fields into specific structs in Go without using an intermediate map?

Dynamically Parsing YAML Fields to Specific Structs in Go

Determining the optimal approach to dynamically parse YAML fields into predefined structs can be a common challenge in Go. Let's examine the provided scenario and explore the best options available.

The Challenge

Given YAML files with varying content and a set of structs representing different data types, the goal is to dynamically parse these fields into the appropriate structs. The provided approach involves using an intermediate map, but a more elegant solution is sought.

Solution

Utilizing the YAML v2.1.0 Yaml parser, here's an improved approach:

<code class="go">type yamlNode struct {
    unmarshal func(interface{}) error
}

func (n *yamlNode) UnmarshalYAML(unmarshal func(interface{}) error) error {
    n.unmarshal = unmarshal
    return nil
}

type Spec struct {
    Kind string      `yaml:"kind"`
    Spec interface{} `yaml:"-"`
}</code>
Copy after login
<code class="go">func (s *Spec) UnmarshalYAML(unmarshal func(interface{}) error) error {
    type S Spec
    type T struct {
        S    `yaml:",inline"`
        Spec yamlNode `yaml:"spec"`
    }

    obj := &T{}
    if err := unmarshal(obj); err != nil {
        return err
    }
    *s = Spec(obj.S)

    switch s.Kind {
    case "foo":
        s.Spec = new(Foo)
    case "bar":
        s.Spec = new(Bar)
    default:
        panic("kind unknown")
    }
    return obj.Spec.unmarshal(s.Spec)
}</code>
Copy after login

This solution elegantly handles the dynamic parsing by embedding the struct's kind and spec field in the T type. The yamlNode type facilitates the unmarshaling of the Spec interface, allowing for the selection of the appropriate concrete struct.

Updated Approaches for YAML v3

For YAML v3, a similar approach can be used, with minor adjustments:

<code class="go">type Spec struct {
    Kind string      `yaml:"kind"`
    Spec interface{} `yaml:"-"`
}</code>
Copy after login
<code class="go">func (s *Spec) UnmarshalYAML(n *yaml.Node) error {
    type S Spec
    type T struct {
        *S   `yaml:",inline"`
        Spec yaml.Node `yaml:"spec"`
    }

    obj := &T{S: (*S)(s)}
    if err := n.Decode(obj); err != nil {
        return err
    }

    switch s.Kind {
    case "foo":
        s.Spec = new(Foo)
    case "bar":
        s.Spec = new(Bar)
    default:
        panic("kind unknown")
    }
    return obj.Spec.Decode(s.Spec)
}</code>
Copy after login

These updated approaches provide a more direct and efficient method for dynamically parsing YAML fields into the desired struct types without the need for intermediate maps or additional steps.

The above is the detailed content of How do you dynamically parse YAML fields into specific structs in Go without using an intermediate map?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Statement of this Website
The content of this article is voluntarily contributed by netizens, and the copyright belongs to the original author. This site does not assume corresponding legal responsibility. If you find any content suspected of plagiarism or infringement, please contact admin@php.cn

Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress

Undresser.AI Undress

AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover

AI Clothes Remover

Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool

Undress AI Tool

Undress images for free

Clothoff.io

Clothoff.io

AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap

Video Face Swap

Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1

Notepad++7.3.1

Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version

SublimeText3 Chinese version

Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1

Zend Studio 13.0.1

Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6

Dreamweaver CS6

Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version

SublimeText3 Mac version

God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics

Java Tutorial
1655
14
PHP Tutorial
1253
29
C# Tutorial
1227
24
Golang's Purpose: Building Efficient and Scalable Systems Golang's Purpose: Building Efficient and Scalable Systems Apr 09, 2025 pm 05:17 PM

Go language performs well in building efficient and scalable systems. Its advantages include: 1. High performance: compiled into machine code, fast running speed; 2. Concurrent programming: simplify multitasking through goroutines and channels; 3. Simplicity: concise syntax, reducing learning and maintenance costs; 4. Cross-platform: supports cross-platform compilation, easy deployment.

Golang and C  : Concurrency vs. Raw Speed Golang and C : Concurrency vs. Raw Speed Apr 21, 2025 am 12:16 AM

Golang is better than C in concurrency, while C is better than Golang in raw speed. 1) Golang achieves efficient concurrency through goroutine and channel, which is suitable for handling a large number of concurrent tasks. 2)C Through compiler optimization and standard library, it provides high performance close to hardware, suitable for applications that require extreme optimization.

Golang vs. Python: Key Differences and Similarities Golang vs. Python: Key Differences and Similarities Apr 17, 2025 am 12:15 AM

Golang and Python each have their own advantages: Golang is suitable for high performance and concurrent programming, while Python is suitable for data science and web development. Golang is known for its concurrency model and efficient performance, while Python is known for its concise syntax and rich library ecosystem.

Golang vs. Python: Performance and Scalability Golang vs. Python: Performance and Scalability Apr 19, 2025 am 12:18 AM

Golang is better than Python in terms of performance and scalability. 1) Golang's compilation-type characteristics and efficient concurrency model make it perform well in high concurrency scenarios. 2) Python, as an interpreted language, executes slowly, but can optimize performance through tools such as Cython.

The Performance Race: Golang vs. C The Performance Race: Golang vs. C Apr 16, 2025 am 12:07 AM

Golang and C each have their own advantages in performance competitions: 1) Golang is suitable for high concurrency and rapid development, and 2) C provides higher performance and fine-grained control. The selection should be based on project requirements and team technology stack.

Golang's Impact: Speed, Efficiency, and Simplicity Golang's Impact: Speed, Efficiency, and Simplicity Apr 14, 2025 am 12:11 AM

Goimpactsdevelopmentpositivelythroughspeed,efficiency,andsimplicity.1)Speed:Gocompilesquicklyandrunsefficiently,idealforlargeprojects.2)Efficiency:Itscomprehensivestandardlibraryreducesexternaldependencies,enhancingdevelopmentefficiency.3)Simplicity:

C   and Golang: When Performance is Crucial C and Golang: When Performance is Crucial Apr 13, 2025 am 12:11 AM

C is more suitable for scenarios where direct control of hardware resources and high performance optimization is required, while Golang is more suitable for scenarios where rapid development and high concurrency processing are required. 1.C's advantage lies in its close to hardware characteristics and high optimization capabilities, which are suitable for high-performance needs such as game development. 2.Golang's advantage lies in its concise syntax and natural concurrency support, which is suitable for high concurrency service development.

Golang and C  : The Trade-offs in Performance Golang and C : The Trade-offs in Performance Apr 17, 2025 am 12:18 AM

The performance differences between Golang and C are mainly reflected in memory management, compilation optimization and runtime efficiency. 1) Golang's garbage collection mechanism is convenient but may affect performance, 2) C's manual memory management and compiler optimization are more efficient in recursive computing.

See all articles