


Why Does a `sync.WaitGroup` and Channel Combination Lead to a Deadlock in Go?
Understanding Deadlocks when using sync.WaitGroup and Channels in Go
Developers often encounter issues with their Go applications never exiting when utilizing sync.WaitGroup and channels. This article explores the reasons behind such deadlocks and offers a solution using the WaitGroup.
Consider the example code provided:
package main import ( "fmt" "io" "log" "net/http" "os" "sync" ) var symbols = []string{ "ASSA-B.ST", "ELUX-B.ST", "HM-B.ST", } func main() { fmt.Println("fetching quotes...") fetchedSymbols := make(chan string) var wg sync.WaitGroup wg.Add(len(symbols)) for _, symbol := range symbols { go fetchSymbol(symbol, &wg, fetchedSymbols) } for response := range fetchedSymbols { fmt.Println("fetched " + response) } wg.Wait() fmt.Println("done") } func fetchSymbol(symbol string, wg *sync.WaitGroup, c chan<- string) { defer wg.Done() resp, err := http.Get("http://ichart.yahoo.com/table.csv?s=" + symbol + "&a=0&b=1&c=2000") defer resp.Body.Close() if err != nil { log.Fatal(err) } out, err := os.Create("./stock-quotes/" + symbol + ".csv") defer out.Close() if err != nil { log.Fatal(err) } io.Copy(out, resp.Body) c <- symbol }
In this code, the range loop over fetchedSymbols will block the main function indefinitely. Why? Because the fetchedSymbols channel is never closed. To resolve this deadlock, the WaitGroup can be used to signal when to close the channel:
... go func() { wg.Wait() close(fetchedSymbols) }() for response := range fetchedSymbols { fmt.Println("fetched " + response) } ...
As the WaitGroup already tracks when all goroutines have completed, it can be leveraged to trigger the closing of the fetchedSymbols channel, ensuring the range loop terminates gracefully.
The above is the detailed content of Why Does a `sync.WaitGroup` and Channel Combination Lead to a Deadlock in Go?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics











Golang is better than Python in terms of performance and scalability. 1) Golang's compilation-type characteristics and efficient concurrency model make it perform well in high concurrency scenarios. 2) Python, as an interpreted language, executes slowly, but can optimize performance through tools such as Cython.

Golang is better than C in concurrency, while C is better than Golang in raw speed. 1) Golang achieves efficient concurrency through goroutine and channel, which is suitable for handling a large number of concurrent tasks. 2)C Through compiler optimization and standard library, it provides high performance close to hardware, suitable for applications that require extreme optimization.

Goisidealforbeginnersandsuitableforcloudandnetworkservicesduetoitssimplicity,efficiency,andconcurrencyfeatures.1)InstallGofromtheofficialwebsiteandverifywith'goversion'.2)Createandrunyourfirstprogramwith'gorunhello.go'.3)Exploreconcurrencyusinggorout

Golang is suitable for rapid development and concurrent scenarios, and C is suitable for scenarios where extreme performance and low-level control are required. 1) Golang improves performance through garbage collection and concurrency mechanisms, and is suitable for high-concurrency Web service development. 2) C achieves the ultimate performance through manual memory management and compiler optimization, and is suitable for embedded system development.

Goimpactsdevelopmentpositivelythroughspeed,efficiency,andsimplicity.1)Speed:Gocompilesquicklyandrunsefficiently,idealforlargeprojects.2)Efficiency:Itscomprehensivestandardlibraryreducesexternaldependencies,enhancingdevelopmentefficiency.3)Simplicity:

C is more suitable for scenarios where direct control of hardware resources and high performance optimization is required, while Golang is more suitable for scenarios where rapid development and high concurrency processing are required. 1.C's advantage lies in its close to hardware characteristics and high optimization capabilities, which are suitable for high-performance needs such as game development. 2.Golang's advantage lies in its concise syntax and natural concurrency support, which is suitable for high concurrency service development.

Golang and Python each have their own advantages: Golang is suitable for high performance and concurrent programming, while Python is suitable for data science and web development. Golang is known for its concurrency model and efficient performance, while Python is known for its concise syntax and rich library ecosystem.

The performance differences between Golang and C are mainly reflected in memory management, compilation optimization and runtime efficiency. 1) Golang's garbage collection mechanism is convenient but may affect performance, 2) C's manual memory management and compiler optimization are more efficient in recursive computing.
