


Does json.NewDecoder().Decode() Respect Context Deadlines When Response Bodies are Buffered?
Go json.NewDecoder().Decode() Context Deadline Issue
In Go programs, context deadlines provide a means of setting timeouts for certain operations. However, a user reported an unexpected behavior when using json.NewDecoder().Decode().
User Concerns
The user expected the json.NewDecoder().Decode() to respect the context deadline set for the program. They observed that reading from the response body using ioutil.ReadAll() triggered a context deadline exceeded error, as anticipated. However, when they switched to json.NewDecoder().Decode(), no error was reported, despite the elapsed time exceeding the deadline.
Code Example
<code class="go">ctx, _ := context.WithTimeout(context.Background(), time.Second*5) req, err := http.NewRequestWithContext(ctx, http.MethodGet, url, nil) ... time.Sleep(time.Second * 6) fmt.Println("before reading response body, context error is:", ctx.Err()) err = json.NewDecoder(resp.Body).Decode(ipResponse) if err != nil { panic(err) } fmt.Println("Expected panic but there was none")</code>
Answer
The discrepancy in behavior stems from the use of buffers within the net/http package. Depending on the size and configuration of the response, the body may be partially or fully buffered before it is read. This means that when json.NewDecoder().Decode() is used, the expired context may not prevent the buffered data from being accessed.
To illustrate this, a test server was created that intentionally delayed the response body. It simulated the partial buffering behavior of the net/http package. When readDoesntFail() was executed with this test server, the expected context deadline exceeded error was indeed triggered.
Conclusion
The behavior observed in the user's code highlights the potential caveats of using json.NewDecoder().Decode() with context deadlines. It is important to be aware that if the response body is large and has been completely buffered, the context deadline may not be enforced as expected.
The above is the detailed content of Does json.NewDecoder().Decode() Respect Context Deadlines When Response Bodies are Buffered?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics











Go language performs well in building efficient and scalable systems. Its advantages include: 1. High performance: compiled into machine code, fast running speed; 2. Concurrent programming: simplify multitasking through goroutines and channels; 3. Simplicity: concise syntax, reducing learning and maintenance costs; 4. Cross-platform: supports cross-platform compilation, easy deployment.

Golang is better than C in concurrency, while C is better than Golang in raw speed. 1) Golang achieves efficient concurrency through goroutine and channel, which is suitable for handling a large number of concurrent tasks. 2)C Through compiler optimization and standard library, it provides high performance close to hardware, suitable for applications that require extreme optimization.

Golang and Python each have their own advantages: Golang is suitable for high performance and concurrent programming, while Python is suitable for data science and web development. Golang is known for its concurrency model and efficient performance, while Python is known for its concise syntax and rich library ecosystem.

Golang is better than Python in terms of performance and scalability. 1) Golang's compilation-type characteristics and efficient concurrency model make it perform well in high concurrency scenarios. 2) Python, as an interpreted language, executes slowly, but can optimize performance through tools such as Cython.

C is more suitable for scenarios where direct control of hardware resources and high performance optimization is required, while Golang is more suitable for scenarios where rapid development and high concurrency processing are required. 1.C's advantage lies in its close to hardware characteristics and high optimization capabilities, which are suitable for high-performance needs such as game development. 2.Golang's advantage lies in its concise syntax and natural concurrency support, which is suitable for high concurrency service development.

Golang and C each have their own advantages in performance competitions: 1) Golang is suitable for high concurrency and rapid development, and 2) C provides higher performance and fine-grained control. The selection should be based on project requirements and team technology stack.

Goimpactsdevelopmentpositivelythroughspeed,efficiency,andsimplicity.1)Speed:Gocompilesquicklyandrunsefficiently,idealforlargeprojects.2)Efficiency:Itscomprehensivestandardlibraryreducesexternaldependencies,enhancingdevelopmentefficiency.3)Simplicity:

The performance differences between Golang and C are mainly reflected in memory management, compilation optimization and runtime efficiency. 1) Golang's garbage collection mechanism is convenient but may affect performance, 2) C's manual memory management and compiler optimization are more efficient in recursive computing.
