


Why are my Q-Learning Values So High? A Solution to Unbounded Expected Rewards.
Q-Learning Values Becoming Excessively High
You've encountered a common issue in Q-Learning implementations: state-action values growing too high. Let's explore this problem and provide a solution.
Understanding the Issue
Your agent attempts to maximize the expected total reward. However, your reward function returns positive rewards for game continuation (0.5). This incentivizes the agent to prolong games indefinitely, resulting in unbounded expected total reward and excessively high Q-values.
Solution: Adjusting the Reward Function
To resolve this issue, adjust your reward function to provide negative rewards for every time step. This will penalize the agent for prolonging games and encourage it to seek a winning strategy. For example, you could use the following reward scheme:
- Win: 1
- Lose: -1
- Draw: 0
- Game continues: -0.1
Implementation Considerations
In your code, you're using agent.prevScore as the reward for the previous state-action. However, this should be the actual reward received, not the Q-value. Make this adjustment in your code:
<code class="go">agent.values[mState] = oldVal + (agent.LearningRate * (reward - agent.prevScore))</code>
Expected Behavior
After implementing these changes, you should observe the following behavior:
- Q-values should remain bounded and within a reasonable range.
- The agent should learn to focus on winning rather than prolonging games.
- The model's reported maximum value should be significantly lower.
Keep in mind that reinforcement learning algorithms sometimes exhibit non-intuitive behaviors, and understanding the underlying principles is crucial for developing effective solutions.
The above is the detailed content of Why are my Q-Learning Values So High? A Solution to Unbounded Expected Rewards.. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics











Golang is better than Python in terms of performance and scalability. 1) Golang's compilation-type characteristics and efficient concurrency model make it perform well in high concurrency scenarios. 2) Python, as an interpreted language, executes slowly, but can optimize performance through tools such as Cython.

Golang is better than C in concurrency, while C is better than Golang in raw speed. 1) Golang achieves efficient concurrency through goroutine and channel, which is suitable for handling a large number of concurrent tasks. 2)C Through compiler optimization and standard library, it provides high performance close to hardware, suitable for applications that require extreme optimization.

Goimpactsdevelopmentpositivelythroughspeed,efficiency,andsimplicity.1)Speed:Gocompilesquicklyandrunsefficiently,idealforlargeprojects.2)Efficiency:Itscomprehensivestandardlibraryreducesexternaldependencies,enhancingdevelopmentefficiency.3)Simplicity:

Golang and Python each have their own advantages: Golang is suitable for high performance and concurrent programming, while Python is suitable for data science and web development. Golang is known for its concurrency model and efficient performance, while Python is known for its concise syntax and rich library ecosystem.

Golang is suitable for rapid development and concurrent scenarios, and C is suitable for scenarios where extreme performance and low-level control are required. 1) Golang improves performance through garbage collection and concurrency mechanisms, and is suitable for high-concurrency Web service development. 2) C achieves the ultimate performance through manual memory management and compiler optimization, and is suitable for embedded system development.

The performance differences between Golang and C are mainly reflected in memory management, compilation optimization and runtime efficiency. 1) Golang's garbage collection mechanism is convenient but may affect performance, 2) C's manual memory management and compiler optimization are more efficient in recursive computing.

Goisidealforbeginnersandsuitableforcloudandnetworkservicesduetoitssimplicity,efficiency,andconcurrencyfeatures.1)InstallGofromtheofficialwebsiteandverifywith'goversion'.2)Createandrunyourfirstprogramwith'gorunhello.go'.3)Exploreconcurrencyusinggorout

C is more suitable for scenarios where direct control of hardware resources and high performance optimization is required, while Golang is more suitable for scenarios where rapid development and high concurrency processing are required. 1.C's advantage lies in its close to hardware characteristics and high optimization capabilities, which are suitable for high-performance needs such as game development. 2.Golang's advantage lies in its concise syntax and natural concurrency support, which is suitable for high concurrency service development.
