The Top easons You Should NOT Use Ember.js on Your Next Project
If you're starting a new project and trying to decide on which frontend framework to use, then this article is for you. Here are my top 7 reasons not to use Ember.js on your next project.
1. You Aren't an Ambitious Web Developer
Ember markets itself as "A framework for ambitious web developers," and let's face it, not everyone is ambitious—or a web developer. Ambitious developers work on ambitious projects, and ambitious projects need infrastructure that Ember just includes out of the box.
Back in 1998, I created my first website, "The Track Shack." It was a site about our high school track team, of which I was a member. I didn’t know how to code back then. I wrote articles using Microsoft Word 97 and used the "Save as Web Page" feature to export them to HTML, which I then uploaded to my Geocities website. One day, my coach asked if I had created a website—apparently, other coaches across the state were using it to get track and field news from our area. I’d even included meet results from The Commercial Appeal (which back then wasn’t online) and added dramatized accounts of our team's events from local meets.
If a simple site like that meets your needs, go right ahead and use Word's "Save as Web Page" feature.
2. You Want to Assemble Your Own Framework
Ember is an opinionated, batteries-included frontend framework. If you'd rather spend your time selecting each library, right down to the patch version, and crafting your own bespoke setup, you’ll be sorely disappointed with Ember.
In Ember, you start a new project by running:
npm install -g ember-cli ember new my-project
And voilà—a new project is ready to be run with:
npm start
Note that unit tests will already be configured, which brings us to reason number three.
3. You Don't Plan on Writing Any Unit Tests
Ember automatically sets up unit, integration, and acceptance tests and generates stubs in the correct locations any time you use its built-in code generators. For example, if you create a new component with ember generate component big-button, Ember generates the component files and test stubs for it, which you’re supposed to fill out with assertions to test your component.
If you don’t want tests, you’ll end up with stubs that might raise eyebrows in code review, potentially requiring you to actually write tests—or spend extra time deleting the stubs before you submit the pull request. Sure, you can skip test generation with a command line flag, but that’s hard to remember and not recommended.
4. You Hate Native JavaScript
Ember makes heavy use of native JavaScript features, and using libraries like jQuery to manage the DOM is generally frowned upon. For example, here’s how a class-based component might look:
npm install -g ember-cli ember new my-project
If you’re not a fan of native JavaScript, Ember’s definitely not for you.
5. You Hate Separating Templates from JavaScript
In the old days, we built HTML pages with good old JavaScript strings, like this:
npm start
Template languages eliminate this need, automatically escape dangerous values, and enforce a separation of concerns between logic and presentation (HTML)—which is concerning for some developers.
Another potentially annoying thing about Ember’s template engine is that it automatically updates the HTML in your app when the data changes, which is known as "data binding." If you prefer manually managing the DOM, concatenating strings, or using a different template engine, Ember is not for you.
6. You Hate Updating Dependencies Ever
A core value of the Ember community is "stability without stagnation." The framework is regularly updated in backward-compatible increments, following semantic versioning. Any deprecated functionality triggers a warning in development, telling you when it will be removed and how to update it.
These deprecation messages can create more work if your manager insists on a warning-free build. Updating Ember is generally straightforward, especially if done regularly, but if you’ve ignored updates for years, you’ll have some catching up to do.
7. The Ember Community Uses Discord
If you need help with an Ember project, the community's Discord server, is one of the best places to find it. But if Discord is against your company’s policy (or just not your style), this might be a dealbreaker.
In the Discord server, you will find Ember newbies and framework developers alike, and you can get help, share ideas, and even chat about the future of the project. But beware: these conversations can get interesting—and distracting, which may be why some companies ban Discord.
So, if you prefer AI to real people, Google searches over expert advice, or really hate Discord, save yourself the trouble and skip Ember.js.
Conclusion
And there you have it—my top 7 reasons not to use Ember.js on your next project. If you choose to ignore this advice and dive into Ember anyway, you might just find me lurking in the Discord server. If you have a question and I know the answer, I might try to help—but someone more knowledgeable probably will get to it before I can. So maybe we can just chat about more reasons not to choose Ember for your next project!
The above is the detailed content of The Top easons You Should NOT Use Ember.js on Your Next Project. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics











Python is more suitable for beginners, with a smooth learning curve and concise syntax; JavaScript is suitable for front-end development, with a steep learning curve and flexible syntax. 1. Python syntax is intuitive and suitable for data science and back-end development. 2. JavaScript is flexible and widely used in front-end and server-side programming.

The shift from C/C to JavaScript requires adapting to dynamic typing, garbage collection and asynchronous programming. 1) C/C is a statically typed language that requires manual memory management, while JavaScript is dynamically typed and garbage collection is automatically processed. 2) C/C needs to be compiled into machine code, while JavaScript is an interpreted language. 3) JavaScript introduces concepts such as closures, prototype chains and Promise, which enhances flexibility and asynchronous programming capabilities.

The main uses of JavaScript in web development include client interaction, form verification and asynchronous communication. 1) Dynamic content update and user interaction through DOM operations; 2) Client verification is carried out before the user submits data to improve the user experience; 3) Refreshless communication with the server is achieved through AJAX technology.

JavaScript's application in the real world includes front-end and back-end development. 1) Display front-end applications by building a TODO list application, involving DOM operations and event processing. 2) Build RESTfulAPI through Node.js and Express to demonstrate back-end applications.

Understanding how JavaScript engine works internally is important to developers because it helps write more efficient code and understand performance bottlenecks and optimization strategies. 1) The engine's workflow includes three stages: parsing, compiling and execution; 2) During the execution process, the engine will perform dynamic optimization, such as inline cache and hidden classes; 3) Best practices include avoiding global variables, optimizing loops, using const and lets, and avoiding excessive use of closures.

Python and JavaScript have their own advantages and disadvantages in terms of community, libraries and resources. 1) The Python community is friendly and suitable for beginners, but the front-end development resources are not as rich as JavaScript. 2) Python is powerful in data science and machine learning libraries, while JavaScript is better in front-end development libraries and frameworks. 3) Both have rich learning resources, but Python is suitable for starting with official documents, while JavaScript is better with MDNWebDocs. The choice should be based on project needs and personal interests.

Both Python and JavaScript's choices in development environments are important. 1) Python's development environment includes PyCharm, JupyterNotebook and Anaconda, which are suitable for data science and rapid prototyping. 2) The development environment of JavaScript includes Node.js, VSCode and Webpack, which are suitable for front-end and back-end development. Choosing the right tools according to project needs can improve development efficiency and project success rate.

C and C play a vital role in the JavaScript engine, mainly used to implement interpreters and JIT compilers. 1) C is used to parse JavaScript source code and generate an abstract syntax tree. 2) C is responsible for generating and executing bytecode. 3) C implements the JIT compiler, optimizes and compiles hot-spot code at runtime, and significantly improves the execution efficiency of JavaScript.
