


Why Doesn\'t a Concrete Type Implementation Satisfy an Interface Method Returning an Interface in Go?
Interface Method Returning Interface Mismatch with Concrete Type Implementation
In Go, an interface method that returns an interface only matches an implementation that declares the interface itself, not a concrete type that implements the interface. Consider the following example:
<code class="go">package main import "fmt" type Foo struct { val string } func (f *Foo) String() string { return f.val } type StringerGetter interface { GetStringer() fmt.Stringer } type Bar struct{} func (b *Bar) GetStringer() *Foo { return &Foo{"foo"} } func Printer(s StringerGetter) { fmt.Println(s.GetStringer()) } func main() { f := Bar{} Printer(&f) // compile-time error }</code>
This code gives the following compile-time error:
cannot use &f (type *Bar) as type StringerGetter in argument to Printer: *Bar does not implement StringerGetter (wrong type for GetStringer method)
To resolve this issue, either the GetStringer method in the Bar type should return a fmt.Stringer interface instead of a concrete *Foo type, or the StringerGetter interface should be modified to accept a concrete type instead of an interface.
Alternative Solutions
In cases where modifying the external concrete type or the shared interface is not desirable, there are two alternative solutions:
- Creating a Wrapper Type: You can create a new type that wraps the external concrete type and implements the desired interface. For example:
<code class="go">type MyBar struct { Bar } func (b *MyBar) GetStringer() fmt.Stringer { return b.Bar.GetStringer() }</code>
- Embedding the Concrete Type: Alternatively, you can embed the external concrete type in your own type and implement the interface using the embedded type's methods. For example:
<code class="go">type MyBar struct { embed Bar } func (b *MyBar) GetStringer() fmt.Stringer { return b.GetStringer() }</code>
Both approaches allow you to work with the external concrete type while providing the desired interface implementation without modifying the original type or the shared interface.
The above is the detailed content of Why Doesn\'t a Concrete Type Implementation Satisfy an Interface Method Returning an Interface in Go?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics











Golang is better than Python in terms of performance and scalability. 1) Golang's compilation-type characteristics and efficient concurrency model make it perform well in high concurrency scenarios. 2) Python, as an interpreted language, executes slowly, but can optimize performance through tools such as Cython.

Golang is better than C in concurrency, while C is better than Golang in raw speed. 1) Golang achieves efficient concurrency through goroutine and channel, which is suitable for handling a large number of concurrent tasks. 2)C Through compiler optimization and standard library, it provides high performance close to hardware, suitable for applications that require extreme optimization.

Goisidealforbeginnersandsuitableforcloudandnetworkservicesduetoitssimplicity,efficiency,andconcurrencyfeatures.1)InstallGofromtheofficialwebsiteandverifywith'goversion'.2)Createandrunyourfirstprogramwith'gorunhello.go'.3)Exploreconcurrencyusinggorout

Golang is suitable for rapid development and concurrent scenarios, and C is suitable for scenarios where extreme performance and low-level control are required. 1) Golang improves performance through garbage collection and concurrency mechanisms, and is suitable for high-concurrency Web service development. 2) C achieves the ultimate performance through manual memory management and compiler optimization, and is suitable for embedded system development.

Goimpactsdevelopmentpositivelythroughspeed,efficiency,andsimplicity.1)Speed:Gocompilesquicklyandrunsefficiently,idealforlargeprojects.2)Efficiency:Itscomprehensivestandardlibraryreducesexternaldependencies,enhancingdevelopmentefficiency.3)Simplicity:

C is more suitable for scenarios where direct control of hardware resources and high performance optimization is required, while Golang is more suitable for scenarios where rapid development and high concurrency processing are required. 1.C's advantage lies in its close to hardware characteristics and high optimization capabilities, which are suitable for high-performance needs such as game development. 2.Golang's advantage lies in its concise syntax and natural concurrency support, which is suitable for high concurrency service development.

Golang and Python each have their own advantages: Golang is suitable for high performance and concurrent programming, while Python is suitable for data science and web development. Golang is known for its concurrency model and efficient performance, while Python is known for its concise syntax and rich library ecosystem.

The performance differences between Golang and C are mainly reflected in memory management, compilation optimization and runtime efficiency. 1) Golang's garbage collection mechanism is convenient but may affect performance, 2) C's manual memory management and compiler optimization are more efficient in recursive computing.
