


How does precision work with width in fmt.Printf\'s %g format specifier?
How Does fmt.Printf Work with Width and Precision Fields in %g?
fmt.Printf's behavior with width and precision fields in %g can be confusing. To understand it, we need to clarify the documentation.
The following statement in the documentation is particularly important:
precision sets the number of places after the decimal, if appropriate, except that for %g/%G it sets the total number of digits.
In this statement, "it" refers to precision, not width. This means that while width specifies the minimum field width, precision specifies the total number of digits displayed, excluding leading zeros.
For example, when we format 123.45 using fmt.Printf("%.4g"), the result is 123.5. This is because precision is set to 4, and 123.5 has 4 digits (excluding the decimal point).
However, when there are leading zeros, the behavior becomes more complex. Leading zeros are not counted as digits, and they are not removed when there are less than 4 of them. For example, when we format 0.00012345 using fmt.Printf("%.4g"), the result is 0.0001234. This is because the precision is set to 4, and 0.0001234 has 4 digits (excluding the decimal point and leading zeros).
Now that we understand how precision behaves, we can examine the width field. Width specifies the minimum width of the field, including the decimal place and any exponents. If the formatted value has more digits than the width specified, it will extend beyond the width. However, precision takes priority, so the value must first satisfy the precision requirement.
In your example, you specify .9g, which means a total of 9 digits (excluding leading zeros) and a minimum width of 10, including the decimal point and any exponents. Let's examine each value individually:
- 0.0606060606060606: 9 digits without leading zeros is 0.0606060606, which is already 12 characters wide, exceeding the minimum width of 10.
- 0.3333333333333333: Similar to the previous value, 9 digits without leading zeros is 0.333333333, which is 11 characters wide, exceeding the minimum width of 10.
- 0.05: 9 digits without leading zeros is 0.05, which is less than the minimum width of 10. It will be padded with 6 spaces to meet the minimum width.
- 0.4: Similar to the previous value, 9 digits without leading zeros is 0.4, which is less than the minimum width of 10. It will be padded with 6 spaces to meet the minimum width.
- 0.1818181818181818: 9 digits without leading zeros is 0.181818182, which is due to rounding. It exceeds the minimum width of 10 with 11 characters.
This explains the unexpected widths you observed.
The above is the detailed content of How does precision work with width in fmt.Printf\'s %g format specifier?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics











Go language performs well in building efficient and scalable systems. Its advantages include: 1. High performance: compiled into machine code, fast running speed; 2. Concurrent programming: simplify multitasking through goroutines and channels; 3. Simplicity: concise syntax, reducing learning and maintenance costs; 4. Cross-platform: supports cross-platform compilation, easy deployment.

Golang is better than C in concurrency, while C is better than Golang in raw speed. 1) Golang achieves efficient concurrency through goroutine and channel, which is suitable for handling a large number of concurrent tasks. 2)C Through compiler optimization and standard library, it provides high performance close to hardware, suitable for applications that require extreme optimization.

Golang and Python each have their own advantages: Golang is suitable for high performance and concurrent programming, while Python is suitable for data science and web development. Golang is known for its concurrency model and efficient performance, while Python is known for its concise syntax and rich library ecosystem.

Golang is better than Python in terms of performance and scalability. 1) Golang's compilation-type characteristics and efficient concurrency model make it perform well in high concurrency scenarios. 2) Python, as an interpreted language, executes slowly, but can optimize performance through tools such as Cython.

Goimpactsdevelopmentpositivelythroughspeed,efficiency,andsimplicity.1)Speed:Gocompilesquicklyandrunsefficiently,idealforlargeprojects.2)Efficiency:Itscomprehensivestandardlibraryreducesexternaldependencies,enhancingdevelopmentefficiency.3)Simplicity:

C is more suitable for scenarios where direct control of hardware resources and high performance optimization is required, while Golang is more suitable for scenarios where rapid development and high concurrency processing are required. 1.C's advantage lies in its close to hardware characteristics and high optimization capabilities, which are suitable for high-performance needs such as game development. 2.Golang's advantage lies in its concise syntax and natural concurrency support, which is suitable for high concurrency service development.

Golang and C each have their own advantages in performance competitions: 1) Golang is suitable for high concurrency and rapid development, and 2) C provides higher performance and fine-grained control. The selection should be based on project requirements and team technology stack.

The performance differences between Golang and C are mainly reflected in memory management, compilation optimization and runtime efficiency. 1) Golang's garbage collection mechanism is convenient but may affect performance, 2) C's manual memory management and compiler optimization are more efficient in recursive computing.
