Table of Contents
Unexpected Behavior of fmt.Printf with Width and Precision Fields for %g
Understanding the Ambiguous Documentation
The True Behavior of %.9g
The Impact of width and precision
Explanation of the Given Example
Home Backend Development Golang How Does the Precision Field Actually Work with `%g` in `fmt.Printf`?

How Does the Precision Field Actually Work with `%g` in `fmt.Printf`?

Oct 26, 2024 am 01:27 AM

How Does the Precision Field Actually Work with `%g` in `fmt.Printf`?

Unexpected Behavior of fmt.Printf with Width and Precision Fields for %g

Understanding the Ambiguous Documentation

The documentation for fmt.Printf's formatting fields for floating-point values states that:

"For floating-point values, width sets the minimum width of the field
and precision sets the number of places after the decimal, if
appropriate, except that for %g/%G it sets the total number of digits."

The confusing part lies in the usage of "it" in the last sentence. It actually refers to "precision," not "width."

The True Behavior of %.9g

Contrary to the intuition that %.9g should produce a total of 9 significant digits, it actually only considers digits after the decimal point.

For example, 123456.789 will be formatted as 123.4e 03 because %.9g effectively truncates any leading zeros.

Conversely, 0.0000012345 will be formatted as 1.2345e-06 because %.9g considers all significant digits after the decimal point.

The Impact of width and precision

The width field specifies the minimum width of the entire formatted string, including the decimal point and exponent (if any).

The precision field, as described above, sets the number of significant digits after the decimal point.

For %g, the precision field overrides the width field. However, if the formatted string exceeds the specified width, it will extend beyond the specified width.

Explanation of the Given Example

Recall that the example involves formatting the following floating-point values using .9g:

  • 0.0606060606060606
  • 0.3333333333333333
  • 0.05
  • 0.4
  • 0.1818181818181818
  • 0.0606060606060606: The precision of 9 truncates the leading zeros, resulting in 0.0606060606, which fits within the width of 10.
  • 0.3333333333333333: Similar to the first example, the resulting string 0.333333333 fits within the width of 10.
  • 0.05: With only 2 significant digits, 0.05 is padded with spaces to meet the minimum width of 10.
  • 0.4: Similar to 0.05, 0.4 is also padded to meet the minimum width of 10.
  • 0.1818181818181818: The precision of 9 results in 0.181818182 with the trailing 2 being rounded up. This string fits within the width of 10.

The above is the detailed content of How Does the Precision Field Actually Work with `%g` in `fmt.Printf`?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Statement of this Website
The content of this article is voluntarily contributed by netizens, and the copyright belongs to the original author. This site does not assume corresponding legal responsibility. If you find any content suspected of plagiarism or infringement, please contact admin@php.cn

Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress

Undresser.AI Undress

AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover

AI Clothes Remover

Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool

Undress AI Tool

Undress images for free

Clothoff.io

Clothoff.io

AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap

Video Face Swap

Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Roblox: Bubble Gum Simulator Infinity - How To Get And Use Royal Keys
3 weeks ago By 尊渡假赌尊渡假赌尊渡假赌
Mandragora: Whispers Of The Witch Tree - How To Unlock The Grappling Hook
3 weeks ago By 尊渡假赌尊渡假赌尊渡假赌
Nordhold: Fusion System, Explained
3 weeks ago By 尊渡假赌尊渡假赌尊渡假赌

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1

Notepad++7.3.1

Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version

SublimeText3 Chinese version

Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1

Zend Studio 13.0.1

Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6

Dreamweaver CS6

Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version

SublimeText3 Mac version

God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics

Java Tutorial
1668
14
PHP Tutorial
1273
29
C# Tutorial
1256
24
Golang vs. Python: Performance and Scalability Golang vs. Python: Performance and Scalability Apr 19, 2025 am 12:18 AM

Golang is better than Python in terms of performance and scalability. 1) Golang's compilation-type characteristics and efficient concurrency model make it perform well in high concurrency scenarios. 2) Python, as an interpreted language, executes slowly, but can optimize performance through tools such as Cython.

Golang and C  : Concurrency vs. Raw Speed Golang and C : Concurrency vs. Raw Speed Apr 21, 2025 am 12:16 AM

Golang is better than C in concurrency, while C is better than Golang in raw speed. 1) Golang achieves efficient concurrency through goroutine and channel, which is suitable for handling a large number of concurrent tasks. 2)C Through compiler optimization and standard library, it provides high performance close to hardware, suitable for applications that require extreme optimization.

Getting Started with Go: A Beginner's Guide Getting Started with Go: A Beginner's Guide Apr 26, 2025 am 12:21 AM

Goisidealforbeginnersandsuitableforcloudandnetworkservicesduetoitssimplicity,efficiency,andconcurrencyfeatures.1)InstallGofromtheofficialwebsiteandverifywith'goversion'.2)Createandrunyourfirstprogramwith'gorunhello.go'.3)Exploreconcurrencyusinggorout

Golang vs. C  : Performance and Speed Comparison Golang vs. C : Performance and Speed Comparison Apr 21, 2025 am 12:13 AM

Golang is suitable for rapid development and concurrent scenarios, and C is suitable for scenarios where extreme performance and low-level control are required. 1) Golang improves performance through garbage collection and concurrency mechanisms, and is suitable for high-concurrency Web service development. 2) C achieves the ultimate performance through manual memory management and compiler optimization, and is suitable for embedded system development.

Golang's Impact: Speed, Efficiency, and Simplicity Golang's Impact: Speed, Efficiency, and Simplicity Apr 14, 2025 am 12:11 AM

Goimpactsdevelopmentpositivelythroughspeed,efficiency,andsimplicity.1)Speed:Gocompilesquicklyandrunsefficiently,idealforlargeprojects.2)Efficiency:Itscomprehensivestandardlibraryreducesexternaldependencies,enhancingdevelopmentefficiency.3)Simplicity:

C   and Golang: When Performance is Crucial C and Golang: When Performance is Crucial Apr 13, 2025 am 12:11 AM

C is more suitable for scenarios where direct control of hardware resources and high performance optimization is required, while Golang is more suitable for scenarios where rapid development and high concurrency processing are required. 1.C's advantage lies in its close to hardware characteristics and high optimization capabilities, which are suitable for high-performance needs such as game development. 2.Golang's advantage lies in its concise syntax and natural concurrency support, which is suitable for high concurrency service development.

Golang vs. Python: Key Differences and Similarities Golang vs. Python: Key Differences and Similarities Apr 17, 2025 am 12:15 AM

Golang and Python each have their own advantages: Golang is suitable for high performance and concurrent programming, while Python is suitable for data science and web development. Golang is known for its concurrency model and efficient performance, while Python is known for its concise syntax and rich library ecosystem.

Golang and C  : The Trade-offs in Performance Golang and C : The Trade-offs in Performance Apr 17, 2025 am 12:18 AM

The performance differences between Golang and C are mainly reflected in memory management, compilation optimization and runtime efficiency. 1) Golang's garbage collection mechanism is convenient but may affect performance, 2) C's manual memory management and compiler optimization are more efficient in recursive computing.

See all articles