## Why Can I Call a Pointer Method on a Value in Go?
Go Receiver Methods Calling Syntax Confusion
In the "Pointers vs. Values" section of Effective Go, it states that "value methods can be invoked on pointers and values, but pointer methods can only be invoked on pointers." This is due to the fact that pointer methods can modify the receiver, and invoking them on a copy of the value would cause these modifications to be discarded.
However, some developers have encountered a situation where they were able to invoke a pointer method on a value, which seemingly contradicts the documented syntax rules. To clarify this confusion, we will explore this behavior in more detail.
Consider the following Go code:
<code class="go">package main import ( "fmt" "reflect" ) type age int func (a age) String() string { return fmt.Sprintf("%d yeasr(s) old", int(a)) } func (a *age) Set(newAge int) { if newAge >= 0 { *a = age(newAge) } } func main() { var vAge age = 5 pAge := new(age) fmt.Printf("TypeOf =>\n\tvAge: %v\n\tpAge: %v\n", reflect.TypeOf(vAge), reflect.TypeOf(pAge)) fmt.Printf("vAge.String(): %v\n", vAge.String()) fmt.Printf("vAge.Set(10)\n") vAge.Set(10) fmt.Printf("vAge.String(): %v\n", vAge.String()) fmt.Printf("pAge.String(): %v\n", pAge.String()) fmt.Printf("pAge.Set(10)\n") pAge.Set(10) fmt.Printf("pAge.String(): %v\n", pAge.String()) }</code>
In this example, we define a age type with two methods: String() (value method) and Set() (pointer method). The code creates two variables: vAge, a value of type age, and pAge, a pointer to an age value.
Despite the documentation indicating that vAge.Set() should not be valid syntax, the code compiles without errors. This is because vAge is addressable, meaning it has a memory address that can be referenced. As per the language specification, a method call x.m() on an addressable variable x is valid if x's method set contains m.
In this case, vAge is addressable, and since the method set of *age contains Set(), the call vAge.Set() is shorthand notation for (&vAge).Set(). Essentially, the & operator is being used implicitly to obtain the pointer to vAge.
Therefore, the code demonstrates that value methods can indeed be invoked on pointers because invoking them on an addressable value is equivalent to calling the method on a pointer to that value. The pointer method Set() is still only invocable on pointers, but in the case where the value is addressable, the implicit dereferencing allows for the syntax vAge.Set() to be valid.
The above is the detailed content of ## Why Can I Call a Pointer Method on a Value in Go?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics











Go language performs well in building efficient and scalable systems. Its advantages include: 1. High performance: compiled into machine code, fast running speed; 2. Concurrent programming: simplify multitasking through goroutines and channels; 3. Simplicity: concise syntax, reducing learning and maintenance costs; 4. Cross-platform: supports cross-platform compilation, easy deployment.

Golang is better than C in concurrency, while C is better than Golang in raw speed. 1) Golang achieves efficient concurrency through goroutine and channel, which is suitable for handling a large number of concurrent tasks. 2)C Through compiler optimization and standard library, it provides high performance close to hardware, suitable for applications that require extreme optimization.

Golang and Python each have their own advantages: Golang is suitable for high performance and concurrent programming, while Python is suitable for data science and web development. Golang is known for its concurrency model and efficient performance, while Python is known for its concise syntax and rich library ecosystem.

Golang is better than Python in terms of performance and scalability. 1) Golang's compilation-type characteristics and efficient concurrency model make it perform well in high concurrency scenarios. 2) Python, as an interpreted language, executes slowly, but can optimize performance through tools such as Cython.

Golang and C each have their own advantages in performance competitions: 1) Golang is suitable for high concurrency and rapid development, and 2) C provides higher performance and fine-grained control. The selection should be based on project requirements and team technology stack.

C is more suitable for scenarios where direct control of hardware resources and high performance optimization is required, while Golang is more suitable for scenarios where rapid development and high concurrency processing are required. 1.C's advantage lies in its close to hardware characteristics and high optimization capabilities, which are suitable for high-performance needs such as game development. 2.Golang's advantage lies in its concise syntax and natural concurrency support, which is suitable for high concurrency service development.

Goimpactsdevelopmentpositivelythroughspeed,efficiency,andsimplicity.1)Speed:Gocompilesquicklyandrunsefficiently,idealforlargeprojects.2)Efficiency:Itscomprehensivestandardlibraryreducesexternaldependencies,enhancingdevelopmentefficiency.3)Simplicity:

The performance differences between Golang and C are mainly reflected in memory management, compilation optimization and runtime efficiency. 1) Golang's garbage collection mechanism is convenient but may affect performance, 2) C's manual memory management and compiler optimization are more efficient in recursive computing.
