Home Backend Development Golang Technical Deep Dive: How We Built the Pizza CLI Using Go and Cobra

Technical Deep Dive: How We Built the Pizza CLI Using Go and Cobra

Sep 24, 2024 am 06:18 AM

Technical Deep Dive: How We Built the Pizza CLI Using Go and Cobra

Last week, the OpenSauced engineering team released the Pizza CLI, a powerful and composable command-line tool for generating CODEOWNER files and integrating with the OpenSauced platform. Building robust command-line tools may seem straightforward, but without careful planning and thoughtful paradigms, CLIs can quickly become tangled messes of code that are difficult to maintain and riddled with bugs. In this blog post, we'll take a deep dive into how we built this CLI using Go, how we organize our commands using Cobra, and how our lean engineering team iterates quickly to build powerful functionality.

Using Go and Cobra

The Pizza CLI is a Go command-line tool that leverages several standard libraries. Go’s simplicity, speed, and systems programming focus make it an ideal choice for building CLIs. At its core, the Pizza-CLI uses spf13/cobra, a CLI bootstrapping library in Go, to organize and manage the entire tree of commands.

You can think of Cobra as the scaffolding that makes a command-line interface itself work, enables all the flags to function consistently, and handles communicating to users via help messages and automated documentation.

Structuring the Codebase

One of the first (and biggest) challenges when building a Cobra-based Go CLI is how to structure all your code and files. Contrary to popular belief, there is no prescribed way to do this in Go. Neither the go build command nor the gofmt utility will complain about how you name your packages or organize your directories. This is one of the best parts of Go: its simplicity and power make it easy to define structures that work for you and your engineering team!

Ultimately, in my opinion, it's best to think of and structure a Cobra-based Go codebase as a tree of commands:

├── Root command
│   ├── Child command
│   ├── Child command
│   │   └── Grandchild command
Copy after login

At the base of the tree is the root command: this is the anchor for your entire CLI application and will get the name of your CLI. Attached as child commands, you’ll have a tree of branching logic that informs the structure of how your entire CLI flow works.

One of the things that’s incredibly easy to miss when building CLIs is the user experience. I typically recommend people follow a “root verb noun” paradigm when building commands and child-command structures since it flows logically and leads to excellent user experiences.

For example, in Kubectl, you’ll see this paradigm everywhere: “kubectl get pods”, “kubectl apply …“, or “kubectl label pods …” This ensures a sensical flow to how users will interact with your command line application and helps a lot when talking about commands with other people.

In the end, this structure and suggestion can inform how you organize your files and directories, but again, ultimately it’s up to you to determine how you structure your CLI and present the flow to end-users.

In the Pizza CLI, we have a well defined structure where child commands (and subsequent grandchildren of those child commands) live. Under the cmd directory in their own packages, each command gets its own implementation. The root command scaffolding exists in a pkg/utils directory since it's useful to think of the root command as a top level utility used by main.go, rather than a command that might need a lot of maintenance. Typically, in your root command Go implementation, you’ll have a lot of boilerplate setting things up that you won’t touch much so it’s nice to get that stuff out of the way.

Here's a simplified view of our directory structure:

├── main.go
├── pkg/
│   ├── utils/
│   │   └── root.go
├── cmd/
│   ├── Child command dir
│   ├── Child command dir
│   │   └── Grandchild command dir
Copy after login

This structure allows for clear separation of concerns and makes it easier to maintain and extend the CLI as it grows and as we add more commands.

Using go-git

One of the main libraries we use in the Pizza-CLI is the go-git library, a pure git implementation in Go that is highly extensible. During CODEOWNERS generation, this library enables us to iterate the git ref log, look at code diffs, and determine which git authors are associated with the configured attributions defined by a user.

Iterating the git ref log of a local git repo is actually pretty simple:

// 1. Open the local git repository
repo, err := git.PlainOpen("/path/to/your/repo")
if err != nil {
        panic("could not open git repository")
}

// 2. Get the HEAD reference for the local git repo
head, err := repo.Head()
if err != nil {
        panic("could not get repo head")
}

// 3. Create a git ref log iterator based on some options
commitIter, err := repo.Log(&git.LogOptions{
        From:  head.Hash(),
})
if err != nil {
        panic("could not get repo log iterator")
}

defer commitIter.Close()

// 4. Iterate through the commit history
err = commitIter.ForEach(func(commit *object.Commit) error {
        // process each commit as the iterator iterates them
        return nil
})
if err != nil {
        panic("could not process commit iterator")
}
Copy after login

If you’re building a Git based application, I definitely recommend using go-git: it’s fast, integrates well within the Go ecosystem, and can be used to do all sorts of things!

Integrating Posthog telemetry

Our engineering and product team is deeply invested in bringing the best possible command line experience to our end users: this means we’ve taken steps to integrate anonymized telemetry that can report to Posthog on usage and errors out in the wild. This has allowed us to fix the most important bugs first, iterate quickly on popular feature requests, and understand how our users are using the CLI.

Posthog has a first party library in Go that supports this exact functionality. First, we define a Posthog client:

import "github.com/posthog/posthog-go"

// PosthogCliClient is a wrapper around the posthog-go client and is used as a
// API entrypoint for sending OpenSauced telemetry data for CLI commands
type PosthogCliClient struct {
    // client is the Posthog Go client
    client posthog.Client

    // activated denotes if the user has enabled or disabled telemetry
    activated bool

    // uniqueID is the user's unique, anonymous identifier
    uniqueID string
}
Copy after login

Then, after initializing a new client, we can use it through the various struct methods we’ve defined. For example, when logging into the OpenSauced platform, we capture specific information on a successful login:

// CaptureLogin gathers telemetry on users who log into OpenSauced via the CLI
func (p *PosthogCliClient) CaptureLogin(username string) error {
    if p.activated {
        return p.client.Enqueue(posthog.Capture{
            DistinctId: username,
            Event:      "pizza_cli_user_logged_in",
        })
    }

    return nil
}
Copy after login

During command execution, the various “capture” functions get called to capture error paths, happy paths, etc.

For the anonymized IDs, we use Google’s excellent UUID Go library:

newUUID := uuid.New().String()
Copy after login

These UUIDs get stored locally on end users machines as JSON under their home directory: ~/.pizza-cli/telemtry.json. This gives the end user complete authority and autonomy to delete this telemetry data if they want (or disable telemetry altogether through configuration options!) to ensure they’re staying anonymous when using the CLI.

Iterative Development and Testing

Our lean engineering team follows an iterative development process, focusing on delivering small, testable features rapidly. Typically, we do this through GitHub issues, pull requests, milestones, and projects. We use Go's built-in testing framework extensively, writing unit tests for individual functions and integration tests for entire commands.

Unfortunately, Go’s standard testing library doesn’t have great assertion functionality out of the box. It’s easy enough to use “==” or other operands, but most of the time, when going back and reading through tests, it’s nice to be able to eyeball what’s going on with assertions like “assert.Equal” or “assert.Nil”.

We’ve integrated the excellent testify library with its “assert” functionality to allow for smoother test implementation:

config, _, err := LoadConfig(nonExistentPath)
require.Error(t, err)
assert.Nil(t, config)
Copy after login

Using Just

We heavily use Just at OpenSauced, a command runner utility, much like GNU’s “make”, for easily executing small scripts. This has enabled us to quickly onramp new team members or community members to our Go ecosystem since building and testing is as simple as “just build” or “just test”!

For example, to create a simple build utility in Just, within a justfile, we can have:

build:
  go build main.go -o build/pizza
Copy after login

Which will build a Go binary into the build/ directory. Now, building locally is as simple as executing a “just” command.

But we’ve been able to integrate more functionality into using Just and have made it a cornerstone of how our entire build, test, and development framework is executed. For example, to build a binary for the local architecture with injected build time variables (like the sha the binary was built against, the version, the date time, etc.), we can use the local environment and run extra steps in the script before executing the “go build”:

build:
    #!/usr/bin/env sh
  echo "Building for local arch"

  export VERSION="${RELEASE_TAG_VERSION:-dev}"
  export DATETIME=$(date -u +"%Y-%m-%d-%H:%M:%S")
  export SHA=$(git rev-parse HEAD)

  go build \
    -ldflags="-s -w \
    -X 'github.com/open-sauced/pizza-cli/pkg/utils.Version=${VERSION}' \
    -X 'github.com/open-sauced/pizza-cli/pkg/utils.Sha=${SHA}' \
    -X 'github.com/open-sauced/pizza-cli/pkg/utils.Datetime=${DATETIME}' \
    -X 'github.com/open-sauced/pizza-cli/pkg/utils.writeOnlyPublicPosthogKey=${POSTHOG_PUBLIC_API_KEY}'" \
    -o build/pizza
Copy after login

We’ve even extended this to enable cross architecture and OS build: Go uses the GOARCH and GOOS env vars to know which CPU architecture and operating system to build against. To build other variants, we can create specific Just commands for that:

# Builds for Darwin linux (i.e., MacOS) on arm64 architecture (i.e. Apple silicon)
build-darwin-arm64:
  #!/usr/bin/env sh

  echo "Building darwin arm64"

  export VERSION="${RELEASE_TAG_VERSION:-dev}"
  export DATETIME=$(date -u +"%Y-%m-%d-%H:%M:%S")
  export SHA=$(git rev-parse HEAD)
  export CGO_ENABLED=0
  export GOOS="darwin"
  export GOARCH="arm64"

  go build \
    -ldflags="-s -w \
    -X 'github.com/open-sauced/pizza-cli/pkg/utils.Version=${VERSION}' \
    -X 'github.com/open-sauced/pizza-cli/pkg/utils.Sha=${SHA}' \
    -X 'github.com/open-sauced/pizza-cli/pkg/utils.Datetime=${DATETIME}' \
    -X 'github.com/open-sauced/pizza-cli/pkg/utils.writeOnlyPublicPosthogKey=${POSTHOG_PUBLIC_API_KEY}'" \
    -o build/pizza-${GOOS}-${GOARCH}
Copy after login

Conclusion

Building the Pizza CLI using Go and Cobra has been an exciting journey and we’re thrilled to share it with you. The combination of Go's performance and simplicity with Cobra's powerful command structuring has allowed us to create a tool that's not only robust and powerful, but also user-friendly and maintainable.

We invite you to explore the Pizza CLI GitHub repository, try out the tool, and let us know your thoughts. Your feedback and contributions are invaluable as we work to make code ownership management easier for development teams everywhere!

The above is the detailed content of Technical Deep Dive: How We Built the Pizza CLI Using Go and Cobra. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Statement of this Website
The content of this article is voluntarily contributed by netizens, and the copyright belongs to the original author. This site does not assume corresponding legal responsibility. If you find any content suspected of plagiarism or infringement, please contact admin@php.cn

Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress

Undresser.AI Undress

AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover

AI Clothes Remover

Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool

Undress AI Tool

Undress images for free

Clothoff.io

Clothoff.io

AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap

Video Face Swap

Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Roblox: Bubble Gum Simulator Infinity - How To Get And Use Royal Keys
4 weeks ago By 尊渡假赌尊渡假赌尊渡假赌
Nordhold: Fusion System, Explained
4 weeks ago By 尊渡假赌尊渡假赌尊渡假赌
Mandragora: Whispers Of The Witch Tree - How To Unlock The Grappling Hook
3 weeks ago By 尊渡假赌尊渡假赌尊渡假赌

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1

Notepad++7.3.1

Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version

SublimeText3 Chinese version

Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1

Zend Studio 13.0.1

Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6

Dreamweaver CS6

Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version

SublimeText3 Mac version

God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics

Java Tutorial
1673
14
PHP Tutorial
1277
29
C# Tutorial
1257
24
Golang vs. Python: Performance and Scalability Golang vs. Python: Performance and Scalability Apr 19, 2025 am 12:18 AM

Golang is better than Python in terms of performance and scalability. 1) Golang's compilation-type characteristics and efficient concurrency model make it perform well in high concurrency scenarios. 2) Python, as an interpreted language, executes slowly, but can optimize performance through tools such as Cython.

Golang and C  : Concurrency vs. Raw Speed Golang and C : Concurrency vs. Raw Speed Apr 21, 2025 am 12:16 AM

Golang is better than C in concurrency, while C is better than Golang in raw speed. 1) Golang achieves efficient concurrency through goroutine and channel, which is suitable for handling a large number of concurrent tasks. 2)C Through compiler optimization and standard library, it provides high performance close to hardware, suitable for applications that require extreme optimization.

Getting Started with Go: A Beginner's Guide Getting Started with Go: A Beginner's Guide Apr 26, 2025 am 12:21 AM

Goisidealforbeginnersandsuitableforcloudandnetworkservicesduetoitssimplicity,efficiency,andconcurrencyfeatures.1)InstallGofromtheofficialwebsiteandverifywith'goversion'.2)Createandrunyourfirstprogramwith'gorunhello.go'.3)Exploreconcurrencyusinggorout

Golang vs. C  : Performance and Speed Comparison Golang vs. C : Performance and Speed Comparison Apr 21, 2025 am 12:13 AM

Golang is suitable for rapid development and concurrent scenarios, and C is suitable for scenarios where extreme performance and low-level control are required. 1) Golang improves performance through garbage collection and concurrency mechanisms, and is suitable for high-concurrency Web service development. 2) C achieves the ultimate performance through manual memory management and compiler optimization, and is suitable for embedded system development.

Golang vs. Python: Key Differences and Similarities Golang vs. Python: Key Differences and Similarities Apr 17, 2025 am 12:15 AM

Golang and Python each have their own advantages: Golang is suitable for high performance and concurrent programming, while Python is suitable for data science and web development. Golang is known for its concurrency model and efficient performance, while Python is known for its concise syntax and rich library ecosystem.

Golang and C  : The Trade-offs in Performance Golang and C : The Trade-offs in Performance Apr 17, 2025 am 12:18 AM

The performance differences between Golang and C are mainly reflected in memory management, compilation optimization and runtime efficiency. 1) Golang's garbage collection mechanism is convenient but may affect performance, 2) C's manual memory management and compiler optimization are more efficient in recursive computing.

The Performance Race: Golang vs. C The Performance Race: Golang vs. C Apr 16, 2025 am 12:07 AM

Golang and C each have their own advantages in performance competitions: 1) Golang is suitable for high concurrency and rapid development, and 2) C provides higher performance and fine-grained control. The selection should be based on project requirements and team technology stack.

Golang vs. Python: The Pros and Cons Golang vs. Python: The Pros and Cons Apr 21, 2025 am 12:17 AM

Golangisidealforbuildingscalablesystemsduetoitsefficiencyandconcurrency,whilePythonexcelsinquickscriptinganddataanalysisduetoitssimplicityandvastecosystem.Golang'sdesignencouragesclean,readablecodeanditsgoroutinesenableefficientconcurrentoperations,t

See all articles