ost common mistakes when using TypeScript with React
We all learn by studying and doing. As the saying goes, "doing and learning" is key to mastering any skill. After working with React and TypeScript for several years, I've certainly learned a lot. However, developers often make common mistakes when using these technologies together. Here are the five most common mistakes I've encountered:
1. Improper typing of props
- Mistake: Not properly typing props, either by using any or not using interfaces/types at all.
- Solution: Always define prop types using TypeScript's interface or type. This helps catch errors early and provides better documentation.
interface MyComponentProps { title: string; count: number; } export default function MyComponent({ title, count }: MyComponentProps) { ...
2. Using "any" type with every breath
- Mistake: Overusing the "any" type to bypass TypeScript's type-checking, which defeats the purpose of using TypeScript.
- Solution: Use specific types or generics whenever possible. If the type is unknown, consider using unknown or refining the type through type guards.
// Avoid const handleEvent = (event: any) => { // Prefer const handleEvent = (event: MouseEvent<HTMLButtonElement>) => {
3. Ignoring Type safety with libraries
- Mistake: Failing to properly type external libraries or third-party components, which can lead to runtime errors.
- Solution: Utilize DefinitelyTyped (@types/ packages) for type definitions of popular libraries. If a library lacks type definitions, create custom types or use module augmentation.
// Install type definitions npm install @types/lodash
// Import with types import _ from 'lodash';
4. Incorrect handling of state and effects
- Mistake: Incorrectly typing state and effects, leading to issues with state updates and dependency arrays in useEffect.
- Solution: Properly type state with useState, and ensure useEffect dependencies are correctly specified.
// State typing const [count, setCount] = useState<number>(0); // Effect with dependency array useEffect(() => { ... }, [count]);
5. Not leveraging type inference
- Mistake: Manually typing everything even when TypeScript can infer types automatically. This is redundant and verbose code.
- Solution: Easy... allow TypeScript to infer types where appropriate to keep the code clean and concise.
// Overly verbose const add = (a: number, b: number): number => { return a + b; }; // Leveraging type inference const add = (a: number, b: number) => { return a + b; };
These are not the only but perhaps the most common mistakes I stop doing as a React/TypeScript developer.
There is still a lot to learn to continue writing more robust, maintainable, and error-free code (if that exist).
The above is the detailed content of ost common mistakes when using TypeScript with React. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics











Different JavaScript engines have different effects when parsing and executing JavaScript code, because the implementation principles and optimization strategies of each engine differ. 1. Lexical analysis: convert source code into lexical unit. 2. Grammar analysis: Generate an abstract syntax tree. 3. Optimization and compilation: Generate machine code through the JIT compiler. 4. Execute: Run the machine code. V8 engine optimizes through instant compilation and hidden class, SpiderMonkey uses a type inference system, resulting in different performance performance on the same code.

Python is more suitable for beginners, with a smooth learning curve and concise syntax; JavaScript is suitable for front-end development, with a steep learning curve and flexible syntax. 1. Python syntax is intuitive and suitable for data science and back-end development. 2. JavaScript is flexible and widely used in front-end and server-side programming.

The shift from C/C to JavaScript requires adapting to dynamic typing, garbage collection and asynchronous programming. 1) C/C is a statically typed language that requires manual memory management, while JavaScript is dynamically typed and garbage collection is automatically processed. 2) C/C needs to be compiled into machine code, while JavaScript is an interpreted language. 3) JavaScript introduces concepts such as closures, prototype chains and Promise, which enhances flexibility and asynchronous programming capabilities.

The main uses of JavaScript in web development include client interaction, form verification and asynchronous communication. 1) Dynamic content update and user interaction through DOM operations; 2) Client verification is carried out before the user submits data to improve the user experience; 3) Refreshless communication with the server is achieved through AJAX technology.

JavaScript's application in the real world includes front-end and back-end development. 1) Display front-end applications by building a TODO list application, involving DOM operations and event processing. 2) Build RESTfulAPI through Node.js and Express to demonstrate back-end applications.

Understanding how JavaScript engine works internally is important to developers because it helps write more efficient code and understand performance bottlenecks and optimization strategies. 1) The engine's workflow includes three stages: parsing, compiling and execution; 2) During the execution process, the engine will perform dynamic optimization, such as inline cache and hidden classes; 3) Best practices include avoiding global variables, optimizing loops, using const and lets, and avoiding excessive use of closures.

Python and JavaScript have their own advantages and disadvantages in terms of community, libraries and resources. 1) The Python community is friendly and suitable for beginners, but the front-end development resources are not as rich as JavaScript. 2) Python is powerful in data science and machine learning libraries, while JavaScript is better in front-end development libraries and frameworks. 3) Both have rich learning resources, but Python is suitable for starting with official documents, while JavaScript is better with MDNWebDocs. The choice should be based on project needs and personal interests.

Both Python and JavaScript's choices in development environments are important. 1) Python's development environment includes PyCharm, JupyterNotebook and Anaconda, which are suitable for data science and rapid prototyping. 2) The development environment of JavaScript includes Node.js, VSCode and Webpack, which are suitable for front-end and back-end development. Choosing the right tools according to project needs can improve development efficiency and project success rate.
