useCallback VS useMemo
We all know how to use React.useCallback and React.useMemo, but sometimes we will be confused about which one we should choose.
Here I will show you guys some cases to help you understand what hook function we should use in some specific situations.
import React, { useState } from 'react' export default function App() { const [num1, setNum1] = useState(10) const [num2, setNum2] = useState(12) return <div>{num1 + num2}</div> }
In the above simple example case, we can just get the sum by num1 + num2 in the HTML element part, but if we have some more complex calculation logic, we shouldn't do that anymore.
import React, { useState, useMemo } from 'react' export default function App() { const [num1, setNum1] = useState(10) const [num2, setNum2] = useState(12) const sum = useMemo(() => { const _num1 = Number(num1), _num2 = Number(num2) if (Number.isNaN(_num1) || Number.isNaN(_num2)) { return "check your num's type" } return _num1 + _num2 }, [num1, num2]) return <div>{sum}</div> }
In this example code block, we chose useMemo to keep the result value of num1 + num2, but we add some type check logic, because we can't totally trust the num1 or num2's type would be number, so when the type goes wrong, we will show the placeholder text.
In this situation, you can't realize this effect in the HTML part with simple code in one line. Of course, you can write some logic code in the HTML part with conditional operators (JSX allow you to do that), but the cost is sacrificing the readability of the code.
So, useMemo is a good choice to handle this case.
Ok, let's go on one more complex case.
import React, { useState, useMemo } from 'react' export default function App() { const [num1, setNum1] = useState(10) const [num2, setNum2] = useState(12) const [num3, setNum3] = useState(100) const [num4, setNum4] = useState(120) const sum1 = useMemo(() => { const _num1 = Number(num1), _num2 = Number(num2) if (Number.isNaN(_num1) || Number.isNaN(_num2)) { return "check your num's type" } return _num1 + _num2 }, [num1, num2]) return ( <> <div>{sum1}</div> <div>{num3 + num4}</div> </> ) }
As you can see, we have num3 and num4 here to render the sum of them. If we also want to reuse the logic of num1 + num2, what should we do? Of course we can still use useMemo to define one sum2, but it's not a good idea to reuse the logic to validate the num's type. So we need split the validate logic out from the useMemo. Then useCallback shows up!
import React, { useState, useCallback } from 'react' const validteNumAndSum = (number1, number2) => { const _num1 = Number(number1), _num2 = Number(number2) if (Number.isNaN(_num1) || Number.isNaN(_num2)) { return "check your num's type" } return _num1 + _num2 } export default function App() { const [num1, setNum1] = useState(10) const [num2, setNum2] = useState(12) const [num3, setNum3] = useState(100) const [num4, setNum4] = useState(120) const sumFunc = useCallback(validteNumAndSum, []) return ( <> <div>{sumFunc(num1, num2)}</div> <div>{sumFunc(num3, num4)}</div> </> ) }
As you can see, we use useCallback to return a new function with the logic of validating num's type and calculating the sum, and we reuse this validteNumAndSum function in the HTML part easily.
Ok, let's go to the conclusion part:
If you can easily make a calculation (math or more complex situation), you don't need both of them useMemo and useCallback.
If your calculation logic is complex and just needs to be calculated once only, you can pick the useMemo hook to package your calculation process and return one simple result.
But if you would use the same logic more than one time, you can choose useCallback to return a memorized function to reuse it in your component.
I am so sorry about useCallback case. I made a mistake that is to explain when to choose useCallback and created a bad example case.
Here I will try again.
import React, { useState, useCallback } from 'react' export default function App() { const [base, setBase] = useState(0) const [num1, setNum1] = useState(10) const [num2, setNum2] = useState(12) const [num3, setNum3] = useState(100) const [num4, setNum4] = useState(120) const sumFunc = useCallback( (number1, number2) => { const _num1 = Number(number1), _num2 = Number(number2) if (Number.isNaN(_num1) || Number.isNaN(_num2)) { return "check your num's type" } return _num1 + _num2 + base }, [base], ) return ( <> <input type="number" value={base} onChange={e => { setBase(Number(e.target.value)) }} /> <div>{sumFunc(num1, num2)}</div> <div>{sumFunc(num3, num4)}</div> </> ) }
In the code above, we add one base number as another variable data, and every sum should be added with the base value, and we have an input to change the value of base, so every time base is changed and sumFunc would be modified too, and we can use it to calculate the right result.
So I will update my conclusion about useCallback: if we just need to reuse some logic, we can package this logic into a function and even split it out from the component as a util function to reuse it anywhere. And if our logic still relies on some variable of the component, we can use useCallback to package the logic and return a memorized new function.
The above is the detailed content of useCallback VS useMemo. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics











Python is more suitable for beginners, with a smooth learning curve and concise syntax; JavaScript is suitable for front-end development, with a steep learning curve and flexible syntax. 1. Python syntax is intuitive and suitable for data science and back-end development. 2. JavaScript is flexible and widely used in front-end and server-side programming.

The main uses of JavaScript in web development include client interaction, form verification and asynchronous communication. 1) Dynamic content update and user interaction through DOM operations; 2) Client verification is carried out before the user submits data to improve the user experience; 3) Refreshless communication with the server is achieved through AJAX technology.

JavaScript's application in the real world includes front-end and back-end development. 1) Display front-end applications by building a TODO list application, involving DOM operations and event processing. 2) Build RESTfulAPI through Node.js and Express to demonstrate back-end applications.

Understanding how JavaScript engine works internally is important to developers because it helps write more efficient code and understand performance bottlenecks and optimization strategies. 1) The engine's workflow includes three stages: parsing, compiling and execution; 2) During the execution process, the engine will perform dynamic optimization, such as inline cache and hidden classes; 3) Best practices include avoiding global variables, optimizing loops, using const and lets, and avoiding excessive use of closures.

Python and JavaScript have their own advantages and disadvantages in terms of community, libraries and resources. 1) The Python community is friendly and suitable for beginners, but the front-end development resources are not as rich as JavaScript. 2) Python is powerful in data science and machine learning libraries, while JavaScript is better in front-end development libraries and frameworks. 3) Both have rich learning resources, but Python is suitable for starting with official documents, while JavaScript is better with MDNWebDocs. The choice should be based on project needs and personal interests.

Both Python and JavaScript's choices in development environments are important. 1) Python's development environment includes PyCharm, JupyterNotebook and Anaconda, which are suitable for data science and rapid prototyping. 2) The development environment of JavaScript includes Node.js, VSCode and Webpack, which are suitable for front-end and back-end development. Choosing the right tools according to project needs can improve development efficiency and project success rate.

C and C play a vital role in the JavaScript engine, mainly used to implement interpreters and JIT compilers. 1) C is used to parse JavaScript source code and generate an abstract syntax tree. 2) C is responsible for generating and executing bytecode. 3) C implements the JIT compiler, optimizes and compiles hot-spot code at runtime, and significantly improves the execution efficiency of JavaScript.

Python is more suitable for data science and automation, while JavaScript is more suitable for front-end and full-stack development. 1. Python performs well in data science and machine learning, using libraries such as NumPy and Pandas for data processing and modeling. 2. Python is concise and efficient in automation and scripting. 3. JavaScript is indispensable in front-end development and is used to build dynamic web pages and single-page applications. 4. JavaScript plays a role in back-end development through Node.js and supports full-stack development.
