How To Count Strings With Emojis In JavaScript
I love emojis. Who doesn’t?
I was polishing off a highly intellectual X post a few days ago when I realized something.
Emojis aren’t counted the same as regular characters
When typing out emojis in the new post section of X, you can see how regular characters count less than emojis.
After a quick search, I found out it has something to do with how they are encoded in the Unicode system.
Essentially, emojis are made of multiple code points, and length only counts code points, not characters.
Regardless of why it happens, I thought about all the text counters I’ve created and how many exist in SaaS land.
Emojis are not getting their fair shake ?.
Simply taking the length of the string isn’t an accurate count. Take, for example, something like this:
import { useState } from "react"; export default function App() { const [text, setText] = useState(""); function countString() { return text.length; } function handleChange(e) { setText(e.target.value); } return ( <div className="App"> <h1>Make the emojis count ?</h1> <textarea value={text} onChange={handleChange} /> <small>Characters: {countString()}</small> </div> ); }
This is a simple React component that tracks the characters typed into a text field. It is the most common implementation of this feature.
But the output gives us the same problem as my X post:
Modern web development makes it easy to count characters accurately
You can use a built-in object called Intl.Segmenter.
There is a much broader use case for the object, but it essentially breaks down strings into more meaningful items like words and sentences based on a locale you provide. It offers more granularity than simply using code points.
To fix our example above, all we have to do is update our countString function like this:
import { useState } from "react"; export default function App() { const [text, setText] = useState(""); function countString() { return Array.from(new Intl.Segmenter().segment(text)).length; } function handleChange(e) { setText(e.target.value); } return ( <div className="App"> <h1>Make the emojis count ?</h1> <textarea value={text} onChange={handleChange} /> <small>Characters: {countString()}</small> </div> ); }
We create a new instance of the Intl.Segmenter object and pass our text to it. We put that output into an array and then finally take the length, which will be far more accurate than simply taking the length of the original string.
Here is the result:
So why doesn’t X count an emoji correctly?
Short answer: I have no idea.
I’ve been programming far too long to delude myself into thinking there is a simple answer.
But Intl.Segmenter has good browser support, and any performance or memory constraints would be negligible.
My best guess is that the codebase is so large and so old that it isn’t worth the side effects of a refactor.
I’d be happy to learn more if anyone has better insight into this.
I hope this helps ?.
Happy coding ?.
The above is the detailed content of How To Count Strings With Emojis In JavaScript. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics











Different JavaScript engines have different effects when parsing and executing JavaScript code, because the implementation principles and optimization strategies of each engine differ. 1. Lexical analysis: convert source code into lexical unit. 2. Grammar analysis: Generate an abstract syntax tree. 3. Optimization and compilation: Generate machine code through the JIT compiler. 4. Execute: Run the machine code. V8 engine optimizes through instant compilation and hidden class, SpiderMonkey uses a type inference system, resulting in different performance performance on the same code.

Python is more suitable for beginners, with a smooth learning curve and concise syntax; JavaScript is suitable for front-end development, with a steep learning curve and flexible syntax. 1. Python syntax is intuitive and suitable for data science and back-end development. 2. JavaScript is flexible and widely used in front-end and server-side programming.

The shift from C/C to JavaScript requires adapting to dynamic typing, garbage collection and asynchronous programming. 1) C/C is a statically typed language that requires manual memory management, while JavaScript is dynamically typed and garbage collection is automatically processed. 2) C/C needs to be compiled into machine code, while JavaScript is an interpreted language. 3) JavaScript introduces concepts such as closures, prototype chains and Promise, which enhances flexibility and asynchronous programming capabilities.

The main uses of JavaScript in web development include client interaction, form verification and asynchronous communication. 1) Dynamic content update and user interaction through DOM operations; 2) Client verification is carried out before the user submits data to improve the user experience; 3) Refreshless communication with the server is achieved through AJAX technology.

JavaScript's application in the real world includes front-end and back-end development. 1) Display front-end applications by building a TODO list application, involving DOM operations and event processing. 2) Build RESTfulAPI through Node.js and Express to demonstrate back-end applications.

Understanding how JavaScript engine works internally is important to developers because it helps write more efficient code and understand performance bottlenecks and optimization strategies. 1) The engine's workflow includes three stages: parsing, compiling and execution; 2) During the execution process, the engine will perform dynamic optimization, such as inline cache and hidden classes; 3) Best practices include avoiding global variables, optimizing loops, using const and lets, and avoiding excessive use of closures.

Python and JavaScript have their own advantages and disadvantages in terms of community, libraries and resources. 1) The Python community is friendly and suitable for beginners, but the front-end development resources are not as rich as JavaScript. 2) Python is powerful in data science and machine learning libraries, while JavaScript is better in front-end development libraries and frameworks. 3) Both have rich learning resources, but Python is suitable for starting with official documents, while JavaScript is better with MDNWebDocs. The choice should be based on project needs and personal interests.

Both Python and JavaScript's choices in development environments are important. 1) Python's development environment includes PyCharm, JupyterNotebook and Anaconda, which are suitable for data science and rapid prototyping. 2) The development environment of JavaScript includes Node.js, VSCode and Webpack, which are suitable for front-end and back-end development. Choosing the right tools according to project needs can improve development efficiency and project success rate.
