Event-driven design with Log Events and RabbitMQ in Golang
The adoption of event-driven architecture is on the rise as teams pursue more adaptable, scalable, and agile solutions to meet the requirements of contemporary applications. Event-driven architectures support real-time updates and streamline integration across different systems by enabling communication through standardized and structured events.
In a previous blog post, I discussed how webhooks in Auth0 can transmit events, thereby leveraging these events to initiate logic execution. In this article, I will delve into the technical aspects of this architecture and demonstrate how Go (Golang) can be utilized to construct such a system.
Main components:
Let's first have a look at the main components that drive this system.
Log Events:
Auth0 has log events associated with every activity at a tenant level. These events can be used for monitoring or audit purposes. The codes for each event can be checked out here
Webhooks:
We use auth0 webhooks to deliver filtered events to our producer. We filter these events since we are interested in only a handful.
RabbitMQ
RabbitMQ supports multiple messaging protocols, and the one we use to route messages is the Advanced Messaging Queueing Protocol (AMQP). AMQP has three main entities – Queues, Exchanges and Bindings.
Behind the scenes
When an event is triggered in Auth0, it's immediately sent via webhook to our publisher, which then publishes it based on the event type. Once published, the event goes to an exchange. The exchange directs the message to connected queues, where consumers receive it. To enable this process, we establish a channel. This channel allows us to publish messages to exchange and declare queues for subscription.
To create a new queue, we utilize the QueueDeclare function provided by the package on the channel, specifying our desired queue properties. With the queue created, we can use the channel's Publish function to send a message.
Next, we create a consumer that connects to our RabbitMQ and establishes a channel for communication. Using this channel, we can consume messages using the Consume method defined for it.
Groundwork
We use golang-auth0 management package to work on the log events and for the queue actions we use github.com/rabbitmq/amqp091-go.
Given below are the snippets:
Publishing:
A detailed structure of the log can be found here
for _, auth0log := range payload.Logs { switch auth0log.Data.Type { case "slo": _, err = c.Publish(ctx, PublishRequest{ ---your logic--- }) case "ss": _, err = c.Publish(ctx,PublishRequest{ -- your logic ----- }) } }
Exchange:
if consumeOptions.BindingExchange != "" { for _, routingKey := range routingKeys { err = consumer.chManager.channel.QueueBind( queue, routingKey, consumeOptions.BindingExchange, consumeOptions.BindingNoWait, tableToAMQPTable(consumeOptions.BindingArgs), ) if err != nil { return err } } }
Consuming:
func (c *Client) Consume() { err := c.consumer.StartConsuming( func(ctx context.Context, d queue.Delivery) bool { err := c.processMessages(ctx, d.Body, d.Exchange) if err != nil { c.log.Error().Ctx(ctx).Err(err).Str("exchange", d.Exchange).Msg("failed publishing") return nack // send to dlx } return ack // message acknowledged }, c.queueName, []string{c.queueRoutingKey}, func(opts *queue.ConsumeOptions) { opts.BindingExchange = c.queueBidingExchange opts.QueueDurable = true opts.QueueArgs = map[string]interface{}{ "x-dead-letter-exchange": c.queueBidingExchangeDlx, } }, ) if err != nil { c.log.Fatal().Err(err).Msg("consumer: Failed to StartConsuming") } // block main thread so consumers run forever forever := make(chan struct{}) <-forever }
Thus, by leveraging webhooks in Auth0 to trigger events and employing RabbitMQ for reliable message queuing and delivery, we can build scalable and responsive applications. This approach not only enhances flexibility but also supports seamless event processing, enabling efficient handling of asynchronous operations.
I hope this article was helpful and can prove to be beneficial in your event-driven journey.
Happy coding :)
The above is the detailed content of Event-driven design with Log Events and RabbitMQ in Golang. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics











Golang is better than Python in terms of performance and scalability. 1) Golang's compilation-type characteristics and efficient concurrency model make it perform well in high concurrency scenarios. 2) Python, as an interpreted language, executes slowly, but can optimize performance through tools such as Cython.

Golang is better than C in concurrency, while C is better than Golang in raw speed. 1) Golang achieves efficient concurrency through goroutine and channel, which is suitable for handling a large number of concurrent tasks. 2)C Through compiler optimization and standard library, it provides high performance close to hardware, suitable for applications that require extreme optimization.

Goimpactsdevelopmentpositivelythroughspeed,efficiency,andsimplicity.1)Speed:Gocompilesquicklyandrunsefficiently,idealforlargeprojects.2)Efficiency:Itscomprehensivestandardlibraryreducesexternaldependencies,enhancingdevelopmentefficiency.3)Simplicity:

Golang and Python each have their own advantages: Golang is suitable for high performance and concurrent programming, while Python is suitable for data science and web development. Golang is known for its concurrency model and efficient performance, while Python is known for its concise syntax and rich library ecosystem.

Goisidealforbeginnersandsuitableforcloudandnetworkservicesduetoitssimplicity,efficiency,andconcurrencyfeatures.1)InstallGofromtheofficialwebsiteandverifywith'goversion'.2)Createandrunyourfirstprogramwith'gorunhello.go'.3)Exploreconcurrencyusinggorout

Golang is suitable for rapid development and concurrent scenarios, and C is suitable for scenarios where extreme performance and low-level control are required. 1) Golang improves performance through garbage collection and concurrency mechanisms, and is suitable for high-concurrency Web service development. 2) C achieves the ultimate performance through manual memory management and compiler optimization, and is suitable for embedded system development.

The performance differences between Golang and C are mainly reflected in memory management, compilation optimization and runtime efficiency. 1) Golang's garbage collection mechanism is convenient but may affect performance, 2) C's manual memory management and compiler optimization are more efficient in recursive computing.

C is more suitable for scenarios where direct control of hardware resources and high performance optimization is required, while Golang is more suitable for scenarios where rapid development and high concurrency processing are required. 1.C's advantage lies in its close to hardware characteristics and high optimization capabilities, which are suitable for high-performance needs such as game development. 2.Golang's advantage lies in its concise syntax and natural concurrency support, which is suitable for high concurrency service development.
