CSS Modules vs. Styled Components for Styling in Next.js
Styling is a big part of creating a Next.js application.
Among the popular options are CSS modules and styled components. Both come with their different strengths and use cases.
We shall delve into these two approaches, compare their pros, and help decide which might be the best fit for the project.
What Are CSS Modules?
1. Create a CSS Module File: Create a file with the extension .module.css.
/* styles.module.css */ .container { background-color: lightblue; padding: 20px; border-radius: 8px; }
2. Importing and Using the Styles: Import the CSS module in your component, then apply those styles with the className prop.
// components/StyledComponent.js Meaning that one can import styles from './styles.module.css'; export default function StyledComponent() { return <div className={styles.container}>Hello, CSS Modules!</div>; }
What Are Styled Components?
It's a library to both React and Next.js to be able to write actual CSS within your JavaScript.
Again, the approach uses tagged template literals to style your components.
Styled Components are dynamic, meaning you can pass props in them and change styles based on those props.
How To Use Styled Components In Next.Js ?
1. Install Styled Components:
First, install the library.
npm install styled-components
2. Creating and Using a Styled Component:
Import the styled function and define your styled component in it.
// components/StyledComponent.js import styled from 'styled-components'; const Container = styled.div` background-color: lightblue; padding: 20px; border-radius: 8px; `; `` export default function StyledComponent() { return <Container>Hello, Styled Components!</Container>; }
Comparing CSS Modules And Styled Components
1. Scoping and Isolation:
CSS Modules: By preventing pollution of the global namespace, it gives scoped styling by default.
Styled Components: Since they are a part of the component definition, styles are scoped to components naturally.
2. Dynamic Styling:
CSS Modules: Static, and some extra logic is needed to dynamicize the styles.
Styled Components: Native props-based dynamic styling.
3. Curve of Learning:
CSS Modules: Easy for everyone who knows traditional CSS
Styled Components: Requires knowledge of styled-components library and JavaScript template literals.
4. Performance:
CSS Modules: Near zero runtime overhead; it evaluates the styles into standard CSS.
Styled Components: Slightly higher runtime overhead for generating styles on the fly; however, usually negligible.
5. Developer Experience:
CSS Modules: Easy for people who like separating style from logic.
Styled Components: Better dev experience by co-locating styles with their components.
Which One Should You Choose?
The choice of CSS Modules/Stylable vs. Styled Components is predominantly dependent on the needs specific to the projects and preference from the team.
Choose CSS Modules If:
You like traditional CSS.
You want simplicity and low runtime overhead.
You have a huge project with many developers who are familiar with CSS but not with JavaScript-based styling.
Choose Styled Components If:
You like co-locating styles with components.
You would like to have dynamic styling possibilities.
You would like an advanced theming system with the latest CSS features like nesting.
Conclusion
We have looked at two excellent ways to style Next.js applications, each having different advantages. Whether you go for simplicity and ease of use with CSS Modules or dynamism with Styled Components, you will be able to create beautiful and maintainable styles for your projects.
The above is the detailed content of CSS Modules vs. Styled Components for Styling in Next.js. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics











Python is more suitable for beginners, with a smooth learning curve and concise syntax; JavaScript is suitable for front-end development, with a steep learning curve and flexible syntax. 1. Python syntax is intuitive and suitable for data science and back-end development. 2. JavaScript is flexible and widely used in front-end and server-side programming.

The main uses of JavaScript in web development include client interaction, form verification and asynchronous communication. 1) Dynamic content update and user interaction through DOM operations; 2) Client verification is carried out before the user submits data to improve the user experience; 3) Refreshless communication with the server is achieved through AJAX technology.

JavaScript's application in the real world includes front-end and back-end development. 1) Display front-end applications by building a TODO list application, involving DOM operations and event processing. 2) Build RESTfulAPI through Node.js and Express to demonstrate back-end applications.

Understanding how JavaScript engine works internally is important to developers because it helps write more efficient code and understand performance bottlenecks and optimization strategies. 1) The engine's workflow includes three stages: parsing, compiling and execution; 2) During the execution process, the engine will perform dynamic optimization, such as inline cache and hidden classes; 3) Best practices include avoiding global variables, optimizing loops, using const and lets, and avoiding excessive use of closures.

Python and JavaScript have their own advantages and disadvantages in terms of community, libraries and resources. 1) The Python community is friendly and suitable for beginners, but the front-end development resources are not as rich as JavaScript. 2) Python is powerful in data science and machine learning libraries, while JavaScript is better in front-end development libraries and frameworks. 3) Both have rich learning resources, but Python is suitable for starting with official documents, while JavaScript is better with MDNWebDocs. The choice should be based on project needs and personal interests.

Both Python and JavaScript's choices in development environments are important. 1) Python's development environment includes PyCharm, JupyterNotebook and Anaconda, which are suitable for data science and rapid prototyping. 2) The development environment of JavaScript includes Node.js, VSCode and Webpack, which are suitable for front-end and back-end development. Choosing the right tools according to project needs can improve development efficiency and project success rate.

C and C play a vital role in the JavaScript engine, mainly used to implement interpreters and JIT compilers. 1) C is used to parse JavaScript source code and generate an abstract syntax tree. 2) C is responsible for generating and executing bytecode. 3) C implements the JIT compiler, optimizes and compiles hot-spot code at runtime, and significantly improves the execution efficiency of JavaScript.

Python is more suitable for data science and automation, while JavaScript is more suitable for front-end and full-stack development. 1. Python performs well in data science and machine learning, using libraries such as NumPy and Pandas for data processing and modeling. 2. Python is concise and efficient in automation and scripting. 3. JavaScript is indispensable in front-end development and is used to build dynamic web pages and single-page applications. 4. JavaScript plays a role in back-end development through Node.js and supports full-stack development.
