Jest Recap: Safely Mock Properties and Methods of Global Objects
TL;DR:
- You want to avoid that overridden/mocked properties/methods affect other tests.
- For local objects (created and owned by this test) you can (and should) use
- localObject.theAnswer = 42 and
- localObject.calcTheAnswer = jest.fn(() => 42).
- For global objects you should use
- jest.replaceProperty(globalObject, "theAnswer", 42) and
- jest.spyOn(globalObject, "calcTheAnswer").mockReturnValue(42).
- Make sure jest.restoreAllMocks() is called in an afterEach() hook.
What?
In a perfect world codebase there is no need to manipulate global objects, but the world codebases are messy - and so is testing.
What you want to avoid at all costs, is for one test to affect the other. Tests should be meaningful regardless of their order or if some tests are skipped.
Mocking Properties
A naive approach to mock values is to just set the properties to whatever value you need in your test.
This is fine as long as you change values in local objects owned (created by) this specific test:
describe("override properties of local objects", () => { it("works and is harmless", () => { const myArray = [1]; myArray.length = 0; expect(myArray).toHaveLength(0); }); it("does not affect the next test", () => { const myArray = [1]; expect(myArray).toHaveLength(1); }); });
If you do that for global objects, it gets messy:
describe("don't override properties of global objects", () => { it("works before the property is overridden", () => { expect(window.innerWidth).toBeGreaterThan(0); }); it("works, but is evil", () => { window.innerWidth = 0; expect(window.innerWidth).toBe(0); }); it("fails in the test after the property was overridden", () => { expect(() => { expect(window.innerWidth).toBeGreaterThan(0); // <-- ERROR: expect(received).toBeGreaterThan(expected) }).toThrow(Error); }); });
This is what jest.replaceProperty() was made for:
describe("use jest.replaceProperty() to override properties of global objects", () => { afterEach(() => { jest.restoreAllMocks(); }); it("works before the property is overridden", () => { expect(window.innerWidth).toBeGreaterThan(0); }); it("works and is harmless", () => { jest.replaceProperty(window, "innerWidth", 0); expect(window.innerWidth).toBe(0); }); it("does not affect the next test", () => { expect(window.innerWidth).toBeGreaterThan(0); }); });
Mocking Methods
Methods can be mocked similar to properties.
describe("override methods of local objects using jest.fn()", () => { it("works and is harmless", () => { const mySet = new Set([1]); mySet.has = jest.fn().mockReturnValue(false); expect(mySet.has(1)).toBeFalsy(); }); it("does not affect the next test", () => { const mySet = new Set([1]); expect(mySet.has(1)).toBeTruthy(); }); });
If you use myObject.someFunction = jest.fn() on global objects, your tests may depend on each other and loose their meaning:
describe("don't override methods of global objects using jest.fn()", () => { it("works before the method is overridden", () => { expect(document.getElementById("foo")).toBeNull(); }); it("works, but is evil", () => { const el = document.createElement("div"); document.getElementById = jest.fn().mockReturnValue(el); expect(document.getElementById("foo")).toBe(el); }); it("fails in the test after the property was overridden", () => { expect(() => { expect(document.getElementById("foo")).toBeNull(); // <-- ERROR: expect(received).toBeNull() }).toThrow(Error); }); });
How should we mock methods in global objects? That is what jest.spyOn() is good for:
describe("use jest.spyOn() to override methods of global objects", () => { afterEach(() => { jest.restoreAllMocks(); }); it("works before the method is overridden", () => { expect(document.getElementById("foo")).toBeNull(); }); it("works and is harmless", () => { const el = document.createElement("div"); jest.spyOn(document, "getElementById").mockReturnValue(el); expect(document.getElementById("foo")).toBe(el); }); it("does not affect the next test", () => { expect(document.getElementById("foo")).toBeNull(); }); });
You Must Clean up
If you want to be sure all tests find the system in the same (fresh, clean) state, you need to restore the state of mocks after each test.
The simplest solution is to set the restoreMocks configuration property.
The most straight forward option is to call jest.restoreAllMocks() in the afterEach()
How to Mock Something for all Tests
Sometimes you want to Mock things for all tests in a file. If you use jest.spyOn() and jest.replaceProperty() on the top-level or in a describe() block, all Mocks will be reset after the first test is executed.
On the top-level you can safely override properties and methods, without jest.spyOn() and jest.replaceProperty().
If you want to Mock things only for a describe() block, you need to make these calls in a beforeEach() hook.
The above is the detailed content of Jest Recap: Safely Mock Properties and Methods of Global Objects. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics











JavaScript is the cornerstone of modern web development, and its main functions include event-driven programming, dynamic content generation and asynchronous programming. 1) Event-driven programming allows web pages to change dynamically according to user operations. 2) Dynamic content generation allows page content to be adjusted according to conditions. 3) Asynchronous programming ensures that the user interface is not blocked. JavaScript is widely used in web interaction, single-page application and server-side development, greatly improving the flexibility of user experience and cross-platform development.

The latest trends in JavaScript include the rise of TypeScript, the popularity of modern frameworks and libraries, and the application of WebAssembly. Future prospects cover more powerful type systems, the development of server-side JavaScript, the expansion of artificial intelligence and machine learning, and the potential of IoT and edge computing.

Different JavaScript engines have different effects when parsing and executing JavaScript code, because the implementation principles and optimization strategies of each engine differ. 1. Lexical analysis: convert source code into lexical unit. 2. Grammar analysis: Generate an abstract syntax tree. 3. Optimization and compilation: Generate machine code through the JIT compiler. 4. Execute: Run the machine code. V8 engine optimizes through instant compilation and hidden class, SpiderMonkey uses a type inference system, resulting in different performance performance on the same code.

JavaScript is the core language of modern web development and is widely used for its diversity and flexibility. 1) Front-end development: build dynamic web pages and single-page applications through DOM operations and modern frameworks (such as React, Vue.js, Angular). 2) Server-side development: Node.js uses a non-blocking I/O model to handle high concurrency and real-time applications. 3) Mobile and desktop application development: cross-platform development is realized through ReactNative and Electron to improve development efficiency.

Python is more suitable for beginners, with a smooth learning curve and concise syntax; JavaScript is suitable for front-end development, with a steep learning curve and flexible syntax. 1. Python syntax is intuitive and suitable for data science and back-end development. 2. JavaScript is flexible and widely used in front-end and server-side programming.

This article demonstrates frontend integration with a backend secured by Permit, building a functional EdTech SaaS application using Next.js. The frontend fetches user permissions to control UI visibility and ensures API requests adhere to role-base

The shift from C/C to JavaScript requires adapting to dynamic typing, garbage collection and asynchronous programming. 1) C/C is a statically typed language that requires manual memory management, while JavaScript is dynamically typed and garbage collection is automatically processed. 2) C/C needs to be compiled into machine code, while JavaScript is an interpreted language. 3) JavaScript introduces concepts such as closures, prototype chains and Promise, which enhances flexibility and asynchronous programming capabilities.

I built a functional multi-tenant SaaS application (an EdTech app) with your everyday tech tool and you can do the same. First, what’s a multi-tenant SaaS application? Multi-tenant SaaS applications let you serve multiple customers from a sing
