nginx - 关于php模块的动态编译
写法1: --enable-zip
写法2:--enable-zip=shared
写法1是不是指要静态编译?
写法2是不是指要动态编译?会生成.so文件吗? 如果是的话,它与编译完PHP后,使用phpize命令进模块的增加有什么不同?
回复内容:
写法1: --enable-zip
写法2:--enable-zip=shared
写法1是不是指要静态编译?
写法2是不是指要动态编译?会生成.so文件吗? 如果是的话,它与编译完PHP后,使用phpize命令进模块的增加有什么不同?
原理参考:http://www.walu.cc/phpbook/5.2.md
写法1是静态编译,不会生产so文件;写法2是动态编译,会生产so文件。写法2是编译安装PHP时一起做的,实质结果和phpize仍然是一样的,同样要修改ini文件显示的配置扩展so。但是,写法2有几个相关的问题:
- 官方PHP发行源代码中不一定包含你需要的扩展源代码,因此你不能直接enable或with,如果要这样做则需要删除原理的configure文件并拷贝扩展源代码到ext目录,然后
./buildconf --force
重新生成configure文件 - 否则,如果官方PHP发行源代码中没包含你需要的扩展源代码你也没要一定要静态编译的方式安装,则有2个选择:一是如果支持pecl命令安装,则直接用pecl命令安装;如果扩展不支持pecl安装,才自己使用phpize何php-config命令编译安装
关于两种安装方式的区别,前面提到的网站中有相关的说明,主要是静态编译是直接将扩展编译到PHP主程序中了,其扩展调用的步骤不动态编译方式要简单,有利于提高性能。但是,大部分时候,这点性能应该是可以忽略的了

Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics











What’s still popular is the ease of use, flexibility and a strong ecosystem. 1) Ease of use and simple syntax make it the first choice for beginners. 2) Closely integrated with web development, excellent interaction with HTTP requests and database. 3) The huge ecosystem provides a wealth of tools and libraries. 4) Active community and open source nature adapts them to new needs and technology trends.

IIS and PHP are compatible and are implemented through FastCGI. 1.IIS forwards the .php file request to the FastCGI module through the configuration file. 2. The FastCGI module starts the PHP process to process requests to improve performance and stability. 3. In actual applications, you need to pay attention to configuration details, error debugging and performance optimization.

Multiple calls to session_start() will result in warning messages and possible data overwrites. 1) PHP will issue a warning, prompting that the session has been started. 2) It may cause unexpected overwriting of session data. 3) Use session_status() to check the session status to avoid repeated calls.

NGINX and Apache each have their own advantages and disadvantages, and the choice should be based on specific needs. 1.NGINX is suitable for high concurrency scenarios because of its asynchronous non-blocking architecture. 2. Apache is suitable for low-concurrency scenarios that require complex configurations, because of its modular design.

Laravel optimizes the web development process including: 1. Use the routing system to manage the URL structure; 2. Use the Blade template engine to simplify view development; 3. Handle time-consuming tasks through queues; 4. Use EloquentORM to simplify database operations; 5. Follow best practices to improve code quality and maintainability.

AI can help optimize the use of Composer. Specific methods include: 1. Dependency management optimization: AI analyzes dependencies, recommends the best version combination, and reduces conflicts. 2. Automated code generation: AI generates composer.json files that conform to best practices. 3. Improve code quality: AI detects potential problems, provides optimization suggestions, and improves code quality. These methods are implemented through machine learning and natural language processing technologies to help developers improve efficiency and code quality.

Apache remains important in today's technology ecosystem. 1) In the fields of web services and big data processing, ApacheHTTPServer, Kafka and Hadoop are still the first choice. 2) In the future, we need to pay attention to cloud nativeization, performance optimization and ecosystem simplification to maintain competitiveness.

NGINX and Apache are both powerful web servers, each with unique advantages and disadvantages in terms of performance, scalability and efficiency. 1) NGINX performs well when handling static content and reverse proxying, suitable for high concurrency scenarios. 2) Apache performs better when processing dynamic content and is suitable for projects that require rich module support. The selection of a server should be decided based on project requirements and scenarios.
