Table of Contents
Question content
Solution
Home Backend Development Golang Is there a way to constrain (generic) type parameters?

Is there a way to constrain (generic) type parameters?

Feb 09, 2024 pm 01:18 PM

Is there a way to constrain (generic) type parameters?

php editor Youzi discussed a common question: Is there a way to constrain (general) type parameters? In PHP, we often need to impose type constraints on the parameters of functions or methods to ensure that the parameters passed in meet specific type requirements. However, there is currently no direct way to constrain generic type parameters, such as arrays or objects. However, we can implement constraints on common type parameters by writing more strict type checking logic to ensure the correctness and consistency of the parameters. In this article, we'll explore several ways to implement generic type parameter constraints, as well as their pros and cons.

Question content

I just started learning generics. So I'm trying to generalize a driver for a custom database that runs on some protobuf messages.

I would like to find a way to further constrain my generic type, but as a pointer, i.e. make sure (tell the compiler) that the constraint e implements another method.

First, I limited the entities that the database can handle.

type entity interface {
   pb.msga | pb.msgb | pb.msgc
}
Copy after login

Then, a common interface describing the functionality of the database was written so that it could be used by different services handling their own raw messages:

type db[e entity] interface {
   get(...) (e, error)
   list(...) ([]e, error)
   ...
}
Copy after login

So far so good. However, I also want to (de)serialize these entities when communicating with the database so that they can be sent over the network, cloned and merged. Something like this:

func encode[e entity](v *e) ([]byte, error) {
   return proto.marshal(v)
}
Copy after login

However, the above code gives the following error:

cannot use val (variable of type *e) as type protoreflect.protomessage in argument to proto.marshal: *e does not implement protoreflect.protomessage (type *e is pointer to type parameter, not type parameter)
Copy after login

The problem is that proto.marshal requires entities (*e) to implement the proto.message interface, i.e. the protoreflect() method, for all my entity types Both implement the method, but it is unconstrained and cannot be inferred by the compiler.

I also tried defining the entity as:

type Entity interface {
   *pb.MsgA | *pb.MsgB | *pb.MsgC
   proto.Message
}
Copy after login

However, this doesn't feel right, besides the fact that I need to do some extra protreflect operations to instantiate the proto.messages referenced by the entity pointer.

Solution

You can do this:

func encode[m interface { *e; proto.message }, e entity](v m) ([]byte, error) {
    return proto.marshal(v)
}
Copy after login

If you want a more concise syntax than the above, you can cancel the message constraint:

type Message[E Entity] interface {
    *E
    proto.Message
}

func Encode[M Message[E], E Entity](v M) ([]byte, error) {
    return proto.Marshal(v)
}
Copy after login

https://www.php.cn/link/20ba66f905957b34253d9d7abde919f3

The above is the detailed content of Is there a way to constrain (generic) type parameters?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Statement of this Website
The content of this article is voluntarily contributed by netizens, and the copyright belongs to the original author. This site does not assume corresponding legal responsibility. If you find any content suspected of plagiarism or infringement, please contact admin@php.cn

Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress

Undresser.AI Undress

AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover

AI Clothes Remover

Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool

Undress AI Tool

Undress images for free

Clothoff.io

Clothoff.io

AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap

Video Face Swap

Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Roblox: Bubble Gum Simulator Infinity - How To Get And Use Royal Keys
3 weeks ago By 尊渡假赌尊渡假赌尊渡假赌
Nordhold: Fusion System, Explained
4 weeks ago By 尊渡假赌尊渡假赌尊渡假赌
Mandragora: Whispers Of The Witch Tree - How To Unlock The Grappling Hook
3 weeks ago By 尊渡假赌尊渡假赌尊渡假赌

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1

Notepad++7.3.1

Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version

SublimeText3 Chinese version

Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1

Zend Studio 13.0.1

Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6

Dreamweaver CS6

Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version

SublimeText3 Mac version

God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics

Java Tutorial
1670
14
PHP Tutorial
1274
29
C# Tutorial
1256
24
Golang vs. Python: Performance and Scalability Golang vs. Python: Performance and Scalability Apr 19, 2025 am 12:18 AM

Golang is better than Python in terms of performance and scalability. 1) Golang's compilation-type characteristics and efficient concurrency model make it perform well in high concurrency scenarios. 2) Python, as an interpreted language, executes slowly, but can optimize performance through tools such as Cython.

Golang and C  : Concurrency vs. Raw Speed Golang and C : Concurrency vs. Raw Speed Apr 21, 2025 am 12:16 AM

Golang is better than C in concurrency, while C is better than Golang in raw speed. 1) Golang achieves efficient concurrency through goroutine and channel, which is suitable for handling a large number of concurrent tasks. 2)C Through compiler optimization and standard library, it provides high performance close to hardware, suitable for applications that require extreme optimization.

Getting Started with Go: A Beginner's Guide Getting Started with Go: A Beginner's Guide Apr 26, 2025 am 12:21 AM

Goisidealforbeginnersandsuitableforcloudandnetworkservicesduetoitssimplicity,efficiency,andconcurrencyfeatures.1)InstallGofromtheofficialwebsiteandverifywith'goversion'.2)Createandrunyourfirstprogramwith'gorunhello.go'.3)Exploreconcurrencyusinggorout

Golang vs. C  : Performance and Speed Comparison Golang vs. C : Performance and Speed Comparison Apr 21, 2025 am 12:13 AM

Golang is suitable for rapid development and concurrent scenarios, and C is suitable for scenarios where extreme performance and low-level control are required. 1) Golang improves performance through garbage collection and concurrency mechanisms, and is suitable for high-concurrency Web service development. 2) C achieves the ultimate performance through manual memory management and compiler optimization, and is suitable for embedded system development.

Golang's Impact: Speed, Efficiency, and Simplicity Golang's Impact: Speed, Efficiency, and Simplicity Apr 14, 2025 am 12:11 AM

Goimpactsdevelopmentpositivelythroughspeed,efficiency,andsimplicity.1)Speed:Gocompilesquicklyandrunsefficiently,idealforlargeprojects.2)Efficiency:Itscomprehensivestandardlibraryreducesexternaldependencies,enhancingdevelopmentefficiency.3)Simplicity:

Golang vs. Python: Key Differences and Similarities Golang vs. Python: Key Differences and Similarities Apr 17, 2025 am 12:15 AM

Golang and Python each have their own advantages: Golang is suitable for high performance and concurrent programming, while Python is suitable for data science and web development. Golang is known for its concurrency model and efficient performance, while Python is known for its concise syntax and rich library ecosystem.

Golang and C  : The Trade-offs in Performance Golang and C : The Trade-offs in Performance Apr 17, 2025 am 12:18 AM

The performance differences between Golang and C are mainly reflected in memory management, compilation optimization and runtime efficiency. 1) Golang's garbage collection mechanism is convenient but may affect performance, 2) C's manual memory management and compiler optimization are more efficient in recursive computing.

The Performance Race: Golang vs. C The Performance Race: Golang vs. C Apr 16, 2025 am 12:07 AM

Golang and C each have their own advantages in performance competitions: 1) Golang is suitable for high concurrency and rapid development, and 2) C provides higher performance and fine-grained control. The selection should be based on project requirements and team technology stack.

See all articles