Golang bytes and strings
php editor Youzi will take you to explore in-depth bytes and strings in Golang. In Golang, bytes and string are common data types, but there are some subtle differences and conversion methods between them. Understanding these differences and conversion methods will help you better process your data and optimize program performance. This article will introduce the concepts of bytes and strings, methods of mutual conversion, and their usage scenarios in practical applications, helping you better understand and apply bytes and strings in Golang. Let’s explore together!
Question content
I am trying to find the common elements between two strings of equal length in golang.
The element is found, but the string representation appears to contain byte values as well. How can I get rid of it?
func main() { println(fmt.printf("common element = %s", findcommonelement("abcdefghi", "ijklmnopq"))) } func findcommonelement(firstelements, secondelements string) string { elementsinfirstgroup := make(map[string]bool) for _, charvalue := range firstelements { elementsinfirstgroup[string(charvalue)] = true } for index := range firstelements { if _, ok := elementsinfirstgroup[string(secondelements[index])]; ok { matchingelem := secondelements[index] println(string(matchingelem)) return string(matchingelem) } } panicmessage := fmt.sprintf("could not find a common item between %s and %s", firstelements, secondelements) panic(panicmessage) }
The output I get is
i common element = i18 (0x0,0x0)
Code provided here
Workaround
You should use fmt.sprintf
instead of fmt.printf
.
And avoid using the built-in println
, instead use fmt.println
.
https://pkg.go.dev/[email protected]#printf
func printf(format string, a ...any) (n int, err error)
printf formats according to the format specifier and writes to standard output. It returns the number of bytes written and any write errors encountered.
Therefore 18 (0x0,0x0)
...
18
is the number of characters in the string"common element = i"
.(0x0,0x0)
is thenil
error value printed byprintln
.
More importantly, however, your algorithm is flawed because it mixes bytes with runes. When you range
a string, the iteration variable charvalue
will be assigned a rune
, which may be multibyte. However, when you index a string (e.g. secondelements[index]
), the result is always a single byte
. Therefore, panics or gibberish (invalid bytes) will inevitably be the result of your function. See Examples.
You may get better results by doing the following:
func findCommonElement(firstElements, secondElements string) string { second := map[rune]bool{} for _, r := range secondElements { second[r] = true } for _, r := range firstElements { if second[r] { fmt.Println(string(r)) return string(r) } } panic("...") }
https://www.php.cn/link/dbdc69ea6ccbdea0ca2d796e1af24ebf
The above is the detailed content of Golang bytes and strings. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics











Golang is better than Python in terms of performance and scalability. 1) Golang's compilation-type characteristics and efficient concurrency model make it perform well in high concurrency scenarios. 2) Python, as an interpreted language, executes slowly, but can optimize performance through tools such as Cython.

Golang is better than C in concurrency, while C is better than Golang in raw speed. 1) Golang achieves efficient concurrency through goroutine and channel, which is suitable for handling a large number of concurrent tasks. 2)C Through compiler optimization and standard library, it provides high performance close to hardware, suitable for applications that require extreme optimization.

Goisidealforbeginnersandsuitableforcloudandnetworkservicesduetoitssimplicity,efficiency,andconcurrencyfeatures.1)InstallGofromtheofficialwebsiteandverifywith'goversion'.2)Createandrunyourfirstprogramwith'gorunhello.go'.3)Exploreconcurrencyusinggorout

Golang is suitable for rapid development and concurrent scenarios, and C is suitable for scenarios where extreme performance and low-level control are required. 1) Golang improves performance through garbage collection and concurrency mechanisms, and is suitable for high-concurrency Web service development. 2) C achieves the ultimate performance through manual memory management and compiler optimization, and is suitable for embedded system development.

Goimpactsdevelopmentpositivelythroughspeed,efficiency,andsimplicity.1)Speed:Gocompilesquicklyandrunsefficiently,idealforlargeprojects.2)Efficiency:Itscomprehensivestandardlibraryreducesexternaldependencies,enhancingdevelopmentefficiency.3)Simplicity:

Golang and Python each have their own advantages: Golang is suitable for high performance and concurrent programming, while Python is suitable for data science and web development. Golang is known for its concurrency model and efficient performance, while Python is known for its concise syntax and rich library ecosystem.

The performance differences between Golang and C are mainly reflected in memory management, compilation optimization and runtime efficiency. 1) Golang's garbage collection mechanism is convenient but may affect performance, 2) C's manual memory management and compiler optimization are more efficient in recursive computing.

Golang and C each have their own advantages in performance competitions: 1) Golang is suitable for high concurrency and rapid development, and 2) C provides higher performance and fine-grained control. The selection should be based on project requirements and team technology stack.
