TypeScript : Utility Utility Types
Introduction to Utility Types
Utility types in TypeScript allow you to transform existing types into new ones by including, excluding, or modifying properties. This can be incredibly useful when you need to create type definitions that are tailored to specific use cases without duplicating code.
Using ReturnType and Awaited in TypeScript
When working with TypeScript, you might often need to determine the return type of a function. TypeScript provides a handy utility type called ReturnType for this purpose. Let’s walk through how to use it, including handling asynchronous functions.
1. Getting the Return Type of a Function
To get the return type of a function, you can use the ReturnType utility type. Here’s an example:
function foo() { const something:string = "" return something; } function async fooWithAsync() { const something:string = "" return something; }
// will return Promise>
In this example:
The foo function returns a string.
ReturnType extracts the return type of foo, which is string.
2. Handling Asynchronous Functions
When dealing with asynchronous functions, the return type is a Promise. Here’s an example:
type MyReturnType = ReturnType
In this example:
The fooWithAsync function returns a Promise that resolves to a string.
ReturnType extracts the return type, which is Promise.
3. Using Awaited for Asynchronous Functions
If you want to get the resolved type of the Promise returned by an asynchronous function, you can use the Awaited utility type. Here’s how:
type MyAsyncReturnType = Awaited<ReturnType<typeof foo>>
In this example:
ReturnType gives Promise.
Awaited> resolves the Promise to its underlying type, which is string.
Summary:
ReturnType: Extracts the return type of a function.
Awaited: Resolves the type of a Promise.
export const getEvents = async (user: User): Promise<ApiResponse> => { const eventsApiUrl: string = `${PROMOS_END_POINTS.EVENTS}`; const apiInstance: AxiosInstance = getAxiosInstance(user, API_SERVICES.PROMOTIONS); const response: AxiosResponse = await apiInstance.get(eventsApiUrl); return response.data; }; type OfferEvent = Awaited<ReturnType<typeof getEvents>>; const initEvent:OfferEvent = {event:[]}
By combining these utility types, you can effectively determine the return types of both synchronous and asynchronous functions in TypeScript.
*Extracting Return Types with Conditional Types in TypeScript
*
In TypeScript, you can use conditional types and type inference to dynamically extract the return type from a function type. This is particularly useful for creating flexible and reusable type utilities. Let’s explore how this works with the MyReturnTypeWithCondition type alias.
type MyReturnTypeWithCondition<T> = T extends (...args: any[]) => infer R ? R : never;
Breaking It Down
Conditional Check: T extends (...args: any[]) => infer R
This part checks if T is a function type.
The ...args: any[] syntax matches any function signature.
The infer R keyword captures the return type of the function into a type variable R.
Result: ? R : never
If T is a function type, the type alias resolves to R, the return type of the function.
If T is not a function type, it resolves to never.
Practical Example
Consider the following example to see this in action:
function foo() { const something:string = "" return something; } function async fooWithAsync() { const something:string = "" return something; }
In above example, ReturnType will be boolean because
Example Function is a function type that returns a boolean. If you use a non-function type, ReturnType will be never.
This approach allows you to create highly adaptable type utilities that can infer and manipulate types based on their structure. It’s a powerful feature of TypeScript that enhances type safety and code maintainability.
Combining and Prettifying Types in TypeScript
When working with TypeScript, you often need to combine multiple types or interfaces to create more complex structures. This can sometimes result in types that are difficult to read and manage. This document will explore how to combine two types, make nested types prettier, and check if merged types are equal.
1. Combining Two Types
Combining two types in TypeScript is a common task. You can achieve this using intersection types (&). Let’s say you have two interfaces, OfferSummaryWithoutConfig and OfferTypeConfiguration, and you want to combine them.
type MyAsyncReturnType = Awaited<ReturnType<typeof foo>>
You can combine these two interfaces using the intersection type (&):
export const getEvents = async (user: User): Promise<ApiResponse> => { const eventsApiUrl: string = `${PROMOS_END_POINTS.EVENTS}`; const apiInstance: AxiosInstance = getAxiosInstance(user, API_SERVICES.PROMOTIONS); const response: AxiosResponse = await apiInstance.get(eventsApiUrl); return response.data; }; type OfferEvent = Awaited<ReturnType<typeof getEvents>>; const initEvent:OfferEvent = {event:[]}
This creates a new type that includes all the properties from both OfferSummaryWithoutConfig and OfferTypeConfiguration.
2. Prettifying Nested Types
When you merge types, the resulting type can sometimes look messy and hard to read. To make these types more readable, you can use a utility type called Prettify.
type MyReturnTypeWithCondition<T> = T extends (...args: any[]) => infer R ? R : never;
This utility type iterates over the keys of the type T and reconstructs it, making the type definition cleaner and easier to read.
After combining the types, you can use the Prettify utility type to clean up the resulting type
Conditional Check: T extends (...args: any[]) => infer R
3. Checking if Merged Types are Equal
To ensure that the merged type is exactly what you expect, you can use utility types to check if two types are identical, exact, or equal.
IsExact: Checks if two types are exactly the same.
type ExampleFunction = (x: number, y: string) => boolean; type ReturnType = MyReturnTypeWithCondition<ExampleFunction>; // ReturnType will be boolean
IsIdentical: Uses conditional types to compare two types.
type IsIdentical
IsEqual: Ensures that both types have the same keys.
export interface OfferSummaryWithoutConfig { id: string; auditInfo: AuditInfo; offerBasicInfo: OfferBasicInfo; metaData: MetaData; conditionGroupsSummary: ConditionGroupsSummary[]; rewardGroupsSummary: RewardGroupsSummary[]; userOperations: ActionPermission; } export interface OfferTypeConfiguration { id: number; name: string; description: string; configuration: Configuration; }
You can use these utility types to check if CombinedType is identical, exact, or equal to another type OfferSummary.
type CombinedType = OfferSummaryWithoutConfig & { offerTypeConfiguration: OfferTypeConfiguration; };
Practical Example
Let’s put it all together with a practical example:
type Prettify<T> = { };
The above is the detailed content of TypeScript : Utility Utility Types. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics











Python is more suitable for beginners, with a smooth learning curve and concise syntax; JavaScript is suitable for front-end development, with a steep learning curve and flexible syntax. 1. Python syntax is intuitive and suitable for data science and back-end development. 2. JavaScript is flexible and widely used in front-end and server-side programming.

The shift from C/C to JavaScript requires adapting to dynamic typing, garbage collection and asynchronous programming. 1) C/C is a statically typed language that requires manual memory management, while JavaScript is dynamically typed and garbage collection is automatically processed. 2) C/C needs to be compiled into machine code, while JavaScript is an interpreted language. 3) JavaScript introduces concepts such as closures, prototype chains and Promise, which enhances flexibility and asynchronous programming capabilities.

The main uses of JavaScript in web development include client interaction, form verification and asynchronous communication. 1) Dynamic content update and user interaction through DOM operations; 2) Client verification is carried out before the user submits data to improve the user experience; 3) Refreshless communication with the server is achieved through AJAX technology.

JavaScript's application in the real world includes front-end and back-end development. 1) Display front-end applications by building a TODO list application, involving DOM operations and event processing. 2) Build RESTfulAPI through Node.js and Express to demonstrate back-end applications.

Understanding how JavaScript engine works internally is important to developers because it helps write more efficient code and understand performance bottlenecks and optimization strategies. 1) The engine's workflow includes three stages: parsing, compiling and execution; 2) During the execution process, the engine will perform dynamic optimization, such as inline cache and hidden classes; 3) Best practices include avoiding global variables, optimizing loops, using const and lets, and avoiding excessive use of closures.

Python and JavaScript have their own advantages and disadvantages in terms of community, libraries and resources. 1) The Python community is friendly and suitable for beginners, but the front-end development resources are not as rich as JavaScript. 2) Python is powerful in data science and machine learning libraries, while JavaScript is better in front-end development libraries and frameworks. 3) Both have rich learning resources, but Python is suitable for starting with official documents, while JavaScript is better with MDNWebDocs. The choice should be based on project needs and personal interests.

Both Python and JavaScript's choices in development environments are important. 1) Python's development environment includes PyCharm, JupyterNotebook and Anaconda, which are suitable for data science and rapid prototyping. 2) The development environment of JavaScript includes Node.js, VSCode and Webpack, which are suitable for front-end and back-end development. Choosing the right tools according to project needs can improve development efficiency and project success rate.

C and C play a vital role in the JavaScript engine, mainly used to implement interpreters and JIT compilers. 1) C is used to parse JavaScript source code and generate an abstract syntax tree. 2) C is responsible for generating and executing bytecode. 3) C implements the JIT compiler, optimizes and compiles hot-spot code at runtime, and significantly improves the execution efficiency of JavaScript.
