


How Does Google Pub/Sub Implement Exponential Backoff in RetryPolicies Compared to github.com/cenkalti/backoff?
Exponential Backoff in RetryPolicies
The exponential backoff feature introduced in Google Pub/Sub's RetryPolicy mirrors the concept described in the ExponentialBackOff defined by github.com/cenkalti/backoff that you mentioned.
Minimum and Maximum Backoff
Yes, you are correct. The MinimumBackoff and MaximumBackoff parameters in pubsub.RetryPolicy correspond to InitialInterval and MaxInterval in github.com/cenkalti/backoff, respectively:
- MinimumBackoff: Initial wait period upon retrying a failed operation.
- MaximumBackoff: Maximum amount of time allowed between retries.
Randomization
Cloud Pub/Sub uses the same formula for randomizing the interval as the github.com/cenkalti/backoff:
randomized interval = RetryInterval * (random value in range [1 - RandomizationFactor, 1 + RandomizationFactor])
The RandomizationFactor is set to 0.15 by default in pubsub.RetryPolicy.
Multiplier and MaxElapsedTime
Unlike github.com/cenkalti/backoff, pubsub.RetryPolicy does not have an equivalent to Multiplier, which doubles the RetryInterval after each failure. Instead, the Pub/Sub retry delay increases exponentially at a fixed rate determined by the RandomizationFactor.
Additionally, there is no explicit MaxElapsedTime in pubsub.RetryPolicy. However, Pub/Sub implements a go-routine-based retry mechanism, where retries are effectively bounded by the lifetime of the go-routine that handles the subscription.
Example
Your experiment demonstrates the exponential backoff behavior accurately. The longer backoff intervals (5s to 60s) result in less frequent retries, while the shorter intervals (1s to 2s) result in more frequent retries. The variance in the intervals is due to the randomization factor.
The above is the detailed content of How Does Google Pub/Sub Implement Exponential Backoff in RetryPolicies Compared to github.com/cenkalti/backoff?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics











Golang is better than Python in terms of performance and scalability. 1) Golang's compilation-type characteristics and efficient concurrency model make it perform well in high concurrency scenarios. 2) Python, as an interpreted language, executes slowly, but can optimize performance through tools such as Cython.

Golang is better than C in concurrency, while C is better than Golang in raw speed. 1) Golang achieves efficient concurrency through goroutine and channel, which is suitable for handling a large number of concurrent tasks. 2)C Through compiler optimization and standard library, it provides high performance close to hardware, suitable for applications that require extreme optimization.

Goisidealforbeginnersandsuitableforcloudandnetworkservicesduetoitssimplicity,efficiency,andconcurrencyfeatures.1)InstallGofromtheofficialwebsiteandverifywith'goversion'.2)Createandrunyourfirstprogramwith'gorunhello.go'.3)Exploreconcurrencyusinggorout

Golang is suitable for rapid development and concurrent scenarios, and C is suitable for scenarios where extreme performance and low-level control are required. 1) Golang improves performance through garbage collection and concurrency mechanisms, and is suitable for high-concurrency Web service development. 2) C achieves the ultimate performance through manual memory management and compiler optimization, and is suitable for embedded system development.

Goimpactsdevelopmentpositivelythroughspeed,efficiency,andsimplicity.1)Speed:Gocompilesquicklyandrunsefficiently,idealforlargeprojects.2)Efficiency:Itscomprehensivestandardlibraryreducesexternaldependencies,enhancingdevelopmentefficiency.3)Simplicity:

Golang and Python each have their own advantages: Golang is suitable for high performance and concurrent programming, while Python is suitable for data science and web development. Golang is known for its concurrency model and efficient performance, while Python is known for its concise syntax and rich library ecosystem.

The performance differences between Golang and C are mainly reflected in memory management, compilation optimization and runtime efficiency. 1) Golang's garbage collection mechanism is convenient but may affect performance, 2) C's manual memory management and compiler optimization are more efficient in recursive computing.

Golang and C each have their own advantages in performance competitions: 1) Golang is suitable for high concurrency and rapid development, and 2) C provides higher performance and fine-grained control. The selection should be based on project requirements and team technology stack.
